^ Agreed. I am on my low res work laptop, but does that say 64c MAX on the vrm when overclocked? If so, that's an achievement on it's own.
^ Agreed. I am on my low res work laptop, but does that say 64c MAX on the vrm when overclocked? If so, that's an achievement on it's own.
That is very impressive, just like the 780 Lightning. Built like a tank.
I also noticed in the Guru3D article they put the power phases at 15+3+2 instead of 12+3+2 from their original news piece. They need to pump some volts into that thing and see if the more robust power circuitry helps or not.
Yes sir. Not sure what to say on the phases, I counted 12 GPU phases, but the MSI slides say 10. Also, from the slides.. :thumbsup:
1400Mhz @ 1.4v This R9 290X would be a monster.
You buying one Elfear?
That would be one fast card especially with the Hynix ram MSI is using. Hopefully someone can get us some Lightning vs Lightning benches as wand3r3r suggested.
Yes, this please. My money on the 290x when both opened up to the MAX.
Damnit, now i'm itching to go overboard with 290x xfire and new CPU,... but I won't.
Yet.
Seriously, once that itch takes root, you're screwed. New friggen spectacular cards always stoke it.
That would be one fast card especially with the Hynix ram MSI is using. Hopefully someone can get us some Lightning vs Lightning benches as wand3r3r suggested.
I'd love to mess around with one but I'll probably stick to my 290s for now. Although that would be worth almost 1Mh/s...
Also the first SINGLE GPU card I have achieved 1000 hash with:-
Very nice :thumbsup:
This is the GEM of the Hawaii cards without a doubt.... Gotta pay to play... :$
It's actually BF4 stable with 1.4v @ 1500MHz and the temps are pretty dang good for the setup. Vrm temps stay below 70c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmK3ChEctaQ
Looks like you missed the locked voltage part.
Apparently they are trying to get us +200 mv over stock.
Keyword here is 'Trying'.
That card is a beast! I was never brave enough to take it to 1.4V on air but it looks like it responded very well to better cooling.
Samsung GDDR5 is speced to tighter timings.
The reason MSI is seeing less OC with Samsung GDDR5 compared to Hynix GDDR5 is obviously because they loosened the timings to try to hit high memory clocks.
This is because the absolutely atrocious IMC on Hawaii has no where near the capability to run errorlessly with Samsung's actual suggested timings.
Don't believe me? Ask TheStilt.
If the memory is even running errorlessly at or over 1500 mhz then they loosened the timings period.
The IMC on Hawaii fails miserably over about 1425 mhz at actual Samsung timings which is what TheStilt sets with his bios mod.
Just a head's up, TheStilt is the persona for the AMD/ATi engineers assigned to memory latency and/or BIOS management.
This thread details the entire reasoning, etc.
It gets pretty technical, so watch out.
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=12830.0
