- Jul 10, 2007
- 12,041
- 3
- 0
I work with a ton of these "people", and they all average about 15-20 sick days a year. makes me sick
pun intended?
I work with a ton of these "people", and they all average about 15-20 sick days a year. makes me sick
I call BS on this. I'm loosing weight now - but I've been at or around the 300lb mark for over 10 years. I can count on my hands the number of times I've seen a doctor.
LOL at all the disgusting fat cunts in this thread getting offended.
If you don't like it then loose some weight you fat pigs.
LOL fail. Calorie for calorie you can buy a 50lb bag of sugar for $35. Probably has a million calories. Beat that.I'd love it if the "healthy food is cheaper" lie were true, but it is not. So far I've seen something about eating a ton of beans because Mexico is known for its health food and a suggestion that I must be an idiot eating low fat ice cream all day. Produce was barely mentioned, because we all know most Americans eat to many expensive veggies anyway.
It is not cheaper. And of course, nothing is easier than opening a bag of chips...even if that isn't relevant to the point.
Calorie for calorie, shit calories from junk will always win. In fact, they are 10 times cheaper:
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/a-high-price-for-healthy-food/
lol yea ok try feeding 3 teenagers and two adults and get back to me on how inexpensive cooking/eating healthy is.
we have beans and rice and cornbread about once a week for dinner. and yes it cheap, but if we had that every night i would face a revolt.
I won't, because i'm not fat, but a fat person could just as easily skip the sour cream, bacon, cheese, salt, and butter. But they won't, because they are lazy, have no self control, and like to think that it's not their fault.
I agree that it's partly intelligence and effort to eat healthier. However, it is not cheaper. However, at least here in America, we subsidize certain agricultural commodities like corn and wheat.
In the US you can get a pretty decent size burger from the dollar menu. You can barely buy an apple (which is nutritonally very weak) for the same dollar.
When you factor in the time, cooking energy and waste of purchasing and cooking healthy food, which consists of perishables, its cheaper to eat high cal, high fat, high sugar and highly processed foods, it clearly costs more to eat healthy.
I call BS on this. I'm loosing weight now - but I've been at or around the 300lb mark for over 10 years. I can count on my hands the number of times I've seen a doctor.
This is true for the health care system in general, but not necessarily for employers.
Think about it: healthy people who eat well, exercise and live to 95 but suffer debilitating, costly cancer in their final years were very healthy and productive all throughout their careers. They probably took very few sick days.
Their health doesn't decline until well into retirement, at which point they're not impacting their employer any longer.
Obese people, OTOH, get sick more often and miss work. The actual cost though, is debatable, and can't be determined just from this study.
Once again fatties prove to be a burden on society. Not only do their co-workers have to see them, they also cost the company money. Do you keep piles of stinking garbage around your house? No. You put it in a bag, throw the bag in a garbage can and keep it outside, out of sight and smell. That's how fatties should be handled in the workplace. Out of sight, out of smell. Everyone knows this.
Indeed there are economic and medical studies from respected journals which shows we should be encouraging fatness and smoking. Primarily because the fat and smokers do not cost the social security system for 30 + years. The medical costs cost MORE for a health nut too. hip surguries, and they still get cancer, heart desease or whatnot eventually which we have to pay for, just like fatty. Difference is fatty is offed at 60-65 not sucking social welfare till 95.
