OBama's response to the Zimmerman verdict. WTF?!

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
No what I expect is for him to behave and speak accordingly for the office he holds. Maybe he could even utilize some objectivity and not make every single situation political to meet his overall political agendas. That's a concept called leadership. If he practiced effective leadership he would understand the implications of his words before he blathered them out for the world to hear.

That is impossible for a person who has never been in charge of anything (his wife runs the household) and appoints people into every imaginable position you can create in order to avoid any culpability when something goes south.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,650
17,233
136
No what I expect is for him to behave and speak accordingly for the office he holds. Maybe he could even utilize some objectivity and not make every single situation political to meet his overall political agendas. That's a concept called leadership. If he practiced effective leadership he would understand the implications of his words before he blathered them out for the world to hear.


Lol, so he should shut up like a good nig***. God forbid the president use his position to push an agenda! The agenda, btw, being to make our communities safer and better. Only a paranoid delusional idiot would come to any other conclusion.
 

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126
I just hope and pray this takes care of GZ's violent streak. I just can't imagine how horrible these jurists would feel if GZ flipped out again and killed another innocent person.

George Zimmerman was fired from his job as an under-the-table security guard for “being too aggressive,” a former co-worker told the Daily News.
Zimmerman, at the center of a firestorm for shooting an unarmed black teenager a month ago, worked for two different agencies providing security to illegal house parties between 2001 and 2005, the former co-worker said.

“Usually he was just a cool guy. He liked to drink and hang with the women like the rest of us,” he said. “But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped.”
The source said Zimmerman, who made between $50 and $100 a night, was let go in 2005.

“He had a temper and he became a liability,” the man said. “One time this woman was acting a little out of control. She was drunk. George lost his cool and totally overreacted,” he said. “It was weird, because he was such a cool guy, but he got all nuts. He picked her up and threw her. It was pure rage. She twisted her ankle. Everyone was flipping out.”

The year 2005 was a bad one for Zimmerman: he was arrested for fighting with a cop trying to arrest his friend for underage drinking, and he and his ex-fiancée took out protective orders against each other.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Lol, so he should shut up like a good nig***. God forbid the president use his position to push an agenda! The agenda, btw, being to make our communities safer and better. Only a paranoid delusional idiot would come to any other conclusion.

Safer and better? Disarming upstanding and law abiding citizens and handing out free phones and food stamps, as well as race baiting does not lead to this outcome.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Zimmerman wouldn't have followed a white kid. It didn't fit the profile person he was targeting. If Martin had been carrying and stood his ground against Zimmerman and killed him after Zimmerman kept pursuing him, you'd be reading about how an African-American male killed the head of a neighborhood watch in the rising tide of crime in the neighborhood.

You cant kill someone for pursuing you. It's perfectly legal to follow someone. Read the law. So yeah Martin would be in prison for murder if he shot GZ for following him.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
I just hope and pray this takes care of GZ's violent streak. I just can't imagine how horrible these jurists would feel if GZ flipped out again and killed another innocent person.

Yeah cause these guys were totally telling the truth and not sensationalizing anything to get their face on TV. And "overreacting" does not include violent behavior. No place in that whole quote did it say anything about being violent by nature. I don't buy the story about picking up a woman and throwing her. It doesn't match up to the stories other people close to him came forward with.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Safer and better? Disarming upstanding and law abiding citizens and handing out free phones and food stamps, as well as race baiting does not lead to this outcome.

Yea, really sad that Obama started stuff like the bolded above. Really sad indeed. He should have not pushed it through Congress and signed it when it finally passed.

:hmm:
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,650
17,233
136
Safer and better? Disarming upstanding and law abiding citizens and handing out free phones and food stamps, as well as race baiting does not lead to this outcome.

Do yourself a favor and look up who and when those programs came out or increased. Do it before you post any more, I wouldn't want you to look like a bigger idiot than you already are.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Zimmerman wouldn't have followed a white kid. It didn't fit the profile person he was targeting. If Martin had been carrying and stood his ground against Zimmerman and killed him after Zimmerman kept pursuing him, you'd be reading about how an African-American male killed the head of a neighborhood watch in the rising tide of crime in the neighborhood.

If the recent crimes in the area were committed by a white kid, I bet he would have followed a white kid. Zimmerman followed him because he fit the description of the person committing crimes in the area.

If Zimmerman chased down Martin and began beating him up with his fists, Martin then pulls out a gun and shoots Zimmerman, I would be of the opinion Martin acted in legal self-defense and should walk free. If Zimmerman does not physically fight Martin, does not pull his gun on Martin, and Martin shoots Zimmerman dead, then Martin should be convicted of murder.

Are we done with the "what if" games? Do you actually want to state what your true opinion is? Are you trying to justify your belief that anyone who thinks this incident was self-defense is a racist? That's pretty much the only argument I've ever seen for those who believe Zimmerman is guilty of murder.
 
Last edited:

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
None of that matters - Zimmerman could have been a violent criminal rasict asshole it does not change his lawful rights to use deadly force when Trayvon Martin was beating the hell out of George Zimmerman. Can't you guys get that? Lawful rights do not change based on who you are we are all equal.

Only thing that would have got Zimmerman coped for murder is if State proved he was not defending his life and was agreesor.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Do yourself a favor and look up who and when those programs came out or increased. Do it before you post any more, I wouldn't want you to look like a bigger idiot than you already are.

I'm looking at what programs he is pushing and trying to keep going and the rights he has tried to remove. I don't care when they started that isn't the point.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
None of that matters - Zimmerman could have been a violent rasict asshole it does not change his lawful rights to use deadly force when Trayvon Martin was beating the hell out of George Zimmerman. Can't you guys get that? Lawful rights do not change based on who you are we are all equal.

Only thing that would have got Zimmerman coped for murder is if State proved he was not defending his life and was agreesor.

The laws need to be different. And, especially, a psycho de-assimilated racist like Zimmerman should NEVER be allowed to have a gun.

This is what Obama is referring to...the gun laws must be changed and the de-assimilated must be disarmed.

At least Zimmerman has now been exposed to be one of the de-assimilated men and his life will now be awful. He'll probably weigh at least 1000 pounds within a year, given the rate at which he was gaining weight. Fat as fuck.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,650
17,233
136
I'm looking at what programs he is pushing and trying to keep going and the rights he has tried to remove. I don't care when they started that isn't the point.

The point is that you are an idiot and apparently you have no idea how government works.

Lol! Stupidity has no shame!
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,920
4,491
136
The laws need to be different. And, especially, a psycho de-assimilated racist like Zimmerman should NEVER be allowed to have a gun.

This is what Obama is referring to...the gun laws must be changed and the de-assimilated must be disarmed.

At least Zimmerman has now been exposed to be one of the de-assimilated men and his life will now be awful. He'll probably weigh at least 1000 pounds within a year, given the rate at which he was gaining weight. Fat as fuck.

You should be de-assimilated from the world. You sound like a god damned broken record.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
The problem with America is that society, government, and laws were established in an era when those who are now largely de-assimilated were in power. Everything needs to be rewritten. The Constitution needs to be shredded and rewritten, the judiciary needs to be replaced, etc.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
The problem with America is that society, government, and laws were established in an era when those who are now largely de-assimilated were in power. Everything needs to be rewritten. The Constitution needs to be shredded and rewritten, the judiciary needs to be replaced, etc.

I'm not sure if I would go that far, but a lot of what you say is correct. The laws need to be rewritten for everyone and not just the de-assimilated men in this country.

The only problem is that the de-assimilated men have been so used to their privileges and advantages at the exclusion of everyone else that it will be quite difficult to accomplish, especially if the de-assimilated are armed and mentally unstable.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
You want to disarm people. To leave us defenseless. We will resist with force.

Care to restate your position?

I wouldn't personally be disarmed anyone. It would be the FBI or someone else disarming others.

And it's not to disarm everyone. Just the de-assimilated mentally unstable people. Interesting that you seem to identify as that...so I guess you would be disarmed, but it would be to protect the rest of us.
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Sounds like Obama wants to disarm people so they cannot defend themselves.

obama made this case political from the start. He has no respect for the 2nd Amendment and would prefer everyone has no guns.

Poor butthurt liberal RabidMongoose. No one is going to change laws to satisfy you. Diversion programs are only available to nonviolent offenders. I don't see any state changing the criteria of only disallowing convicted felons from owning weapons/attaining concealed weapons permit/license.

Agree. He is getting owned so hard. Zimmerman was no racist and the evidence clearly showed this.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Lol, so he should shut up like a good nig***. God forbid the president use his position to push an agenda! The agenda, btw, being to make our communities safer and better. Only a paranoid delusional idiot would come to any other conclusion.

Do we need to agree with your opinions out of fear of you labeling someone a racist?

I personally try to view every person as an individual. While you have proven yourself time and time again in this forum to project characteristics onto individuals based on the group you believe they belong to.

You trying to call someone racist does not carry any weight.

Thank you and have a pleasant tomorrow.