OBama's response to the Zimmerman verdict. WTF?!

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
So much for the extremist insistence to talk of background ,
here a real thug , you know , thoses people who dont
recognize policemen as being legitimate...

hey stupid.. i see u quoted and repeated what u said above.
but ignored my question about providing a direct link to Zimmerman's CONVICTION, which should be public record
 

leper84

Senior member
Dec 29, 2011
989
29
86
The issue is that mental disease is not being detected at all times. For example, George Zimmerman is obviously suffering from mental sickness due to his de-assimilation from American society and culture.

Here we have a crazy fat de-assimilated wannabe cop with a gun. He never should have been allowed to have that weapon in the first place because he is mentally sick.

FPogzVw.jpg
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
The issue is that mental disease is not being detected at all times. For example, George Zimmerman is obviously suffering from mental sickness due to his de-assimilation from American society and culture.

Here we have a crazy fat de-assimilated wannabe cop with a gun. He never should have been allowed to have that weapon in the first place because he is mentally sick.

You still have not defined what de-assimilated is; how it is detected and why is it applicable to Zimmerman.

You claim he has a mental sickness; what is it and why.
When was he determined to be crazy.
He was not fat at the time of the incident.

I have a belly; consider myself fat;
Many years ago; I wanted to be a National Parks LEO.
Should I surrender the weapons that I may have?
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
You still have not defined what de-assimilated is; how it is detected and why is it applicable to Zimmerman.

You claim he has a mental sickness; what is it and why.
When was he determined to be crazy.
He was not fat at the time of the incident.

I have a belly; consider myself fat;
Many years ago; I wanted to be a National Parks LEO.
Should I surrender the weapons that I may have?

De-assimilated is someone who has removed himself from American society and culture. A sign of it is racial issues.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,897
4,882
136
hey stupid.. i see u quoted and repeated what u said above.
but ignored my question about providing a direct link to Zimmerman's CONVICTION, which should be public record

Stupid whom doesnt understand that he had to agree
to a deal in exchange of not being convicted since
he was proved guilty.

Had he refused the deal that he would had been indeed
convicted , dear simple mind...
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
You would need to be Bill Gates to afford playing at the rate he's going.

Not even Bill Gates could afford to play a drinking game that required any drinking when someone puts up a racist post on this forum. If he could afford it somehow, he would be dead within 5 minutes.

de-assimilated
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
34,937
2,089
126
I wouldn't personally be disarmed anyone. It would be the FBI or someone else disarming others.

And it's not to disarm everyone. Just the de-assimilated mentally unstable people. Interesting that you seem to identify as that...so I guess you would be disarmed, but it would be to protect the rest of us.

Define "de-assimilated mentally unstable people" with enough precision so that law enforcement officers could disarm all of them, but not one person who doesn't fit the definition.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Define "de-assimilated mentally unstable people" with enough precision so that law enforcement officers could disarm all of them, but not one person who doesn't fit the definition.

A mental health professional would need to evaluate them and/or their past history can be evaluated for any de-assimilated characteristics, such as racist issues.

And if someone was deemed de-assimilated and thus disarmed, they could still appeal or go under further mental rehabilitation and regain their right to own a gun.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
34,937
2,089
126
A mental health professional would need to evaluate them and/or their past history can be evaluated for any de-assimilated characteristics, such as racist issues.

And if someone was deemed de-assimilated and thus disarmed, they could still appeal or go under further mental rehabilitation and regain their right to own a gun.

Your answer strikes me as incredibly imprecise, and I take issue with that as we're talking about denying rights which are specified in the Constitution.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
A mental health professional would need to evaluate them and/or their past history can be evaluated for any de-assimilated characteristics, such as racist issues.

And if someone was deemed de-assimilated and thus disarmed, they could still appeal or go under further mental rehabilitation and regain their right to own a gun.

LMAO!!!! You need to seek professional help.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Your answer strikes me as incredibly imprecise, and I take issue with that as we're talking about denying rights which are specified in the Constitution.

How would it be imprecise? A mental health professional would evaluate the person and the person's history can be reviewed as well. And there would be avenues for appeal or rehabilitation.

This sounds incredibly precise to me.
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
Your answer strikes me as incredibly imprecise, and I take issue with that as we're talking about denying rights which are specified in the Constitution.
Nothing imprecise about de-assimilastatic issues at all. My suspicion is that you have become de-assimilated. There is a morning firing squad each day and we put all the de-assimilates in front of it that we have found.
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
34,937
2,089
126
How would it be imprecise? A mental health professional would evaluate the person and the person's history can be reviewed as well. And there would be avenues for appeal or rehabilitation.

This sounds incredibly precise to me.

Yes, but what are they looking for? The system would have to be something more specific than "Make sure bad people don't have guns". Without a viable plan of action, the first step of which is the determination of the bounds of the problem, this is all just a feel-good, throwaway idea with no potential for realization.

You're the one advocating it; what are your suggestions for the selection criteria?
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Yes, but what are they looking for? The system would have to be something more specific than "Make sure bad people don't have guns". Without a viable plan of action, the first step of which is the determination of the bounds of the problem, this is all just a feel-good, throwaway idea with no potential for realization.

You're the one advocating it; what are your suggestions for the selection criteria?

They would be looking for mental defects.
 

railer

Golden Member
Apr 15, 2000
1,552
69
91
The butt-hurt is strong in this thread, at least among two posters.
Or do I just think that because I'm de-assimilated?
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Zimmerman was completely de-assimilated from American society as a whole. Zimmerman was a fat wannabe cop who attacked other cops probably out of obese jealousy and had domestic violence issues, obviously had severe racial issues that strongly contribute to his de-assimilation, etc.

De-assimilated American men should never be allowed near a gun.

"...at the age of 21..."

"...shoved a cop..."

last I heard, shoving isn't particularly violent, and cops will claim aggressive behavior if you simply bump into them. Nope, Not willing to use that against him to form an opinion.

besides, that happened when he was 21, he's how old now? you're claiming his behavior then is indicative of his behavior now?

0_o
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
"...at the age of 21..."

"...shoved a cop..."

last I heard, shoving isn't particularly violent, and cops will claim aggressive behavior if you simply bump into them. Nope, Not willing to use that against him to form an opinion.

besides, that happened when he was 21, he's how old now? you're claiming his behavior then is indicative of his behavior now?

0_o

21 is an adult. 17 is a child and people are saying all sorts of things about a child, but somehow a 21 year old adult is off limits. That is very suspicious.