I just wanted to preserve this graph for the thread backfire I expect is coming.![]()
There you have it.
In every post WW 2 recession but two unemployment was back to pre-recession rate within a year of peak unemployment.
Every other president since WW 2 faced with a recession figured out how to create jobs, except Obama...
	The late-2000s financial crisis (often called the Credit Crunch or Global Financial Crisis) is considered by many economists to be the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s.
![]()
There you have it.
In every post WW 2 recession but two unemployment was back to pre-recession rate within a year of peak unemployment.
Every other president since WW 2 faced with a recession figured out how to create jobs, except Obama...
Look at the shape of the recovery from the great depression...![]()
Now, explain to us why you're comparing the recoveries from much more minor financial downturns with the recovery from the Great Recession of 2007-2010? Explain why any rational person would expect that the U.S. economy would recover from worst financial crisis in 80 years as rapidly as after far more minor downturns.
Look at the shape of the recovery from the great depression...
It went up and then it came back down. Slowly, but it did drop.
So ... just like the graph you posted. Unemployment went up, and is now coming back down. Slowly, but it is coming back down.Look at the shape of the recovery from the great depression...
It went up and then it came back down. Slowly, but it did drop.
	Look at the shape of the recovery from the great depression...
It went up and then it came back down. Slowly, but it did drop.
Looks like census helped temporarily, but if you ask small government crowd, that was a bad thing.
Looks like census helped temporarily, but if you ask small government crowd, that was a bad thing.
The census is a bunch of make-work jobs. There's no difference between that and paying people to dig a hole then fill it then dig it again. It doesn't improve the roads, it doesn't upgrade the water pipes, it doesn't produce a product. It sucks money out of the system and accomplishes nothing.
O RLY?In every post WW 2 recession but two unemployment was back to pre-recession rate within a year of peak unemployment.
	There you have it.
In every post WW 2 recession but two unemployment was back to pre-recession rate within a year of peak unemployment.
Every other president since WW 2 faced with a recession figured out how to create jobs, except Obama...
I don't blame Obama for the job losses.All you've show is how bad the job losses were this recession compared to other recessions. Note how long the red line is going down until it bottoms out (26 months after peak employment). Also, Obama took office 14 months after peak employment, in other words, jobs were being lost over a year prior to Obama taking office and the RATE OF LOSS (dy/dx) was at or near its peak. 12 months after Obama taking office, the jobs are on the gain side.
You're blaming Obama for not being able to dig the US out of the biggest hole of job losses fast enough? Wow. W had it easy compared to Obama. If the holes were measured in feet, Bush had to dig out of a 2 ft hole and Obama has to dig out of a 6.4 ft hole. So far Obama has gotten 1.4 ft dug out in 16 months. In the same time frame, Bush dug us out in less than that (slightly less than 1.4 ft) or at the very best equal.I don't blame Obama for the job losses.
I blame him for the lack of recovery. Our charts are the same. Mine is just adjusted so peak unemployment is at the center. When that is done you notice how every other recession has a near perfect bell curve, except for this one.
So either this recession is unique compared to every other recession since WW2. Or our post recessions policies aren't working or might even be hurting us. Probably a little bit of both.
What happened to trickle down economics?
Oh yeah, rich people just kept everything - except NOW you decide to place the lack of job creation on Obama.
