Obama's Campaign is Doomed

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zephyrprime

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,512
2
81
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Craig, after this thread started I headed over to Google and wikipedia to see what I could find on Bush and cocaine. And what I found? Not much. Just a bunch of allegations with very little proof behind them. Bush was arrested in 1974 and daddy had his record cleared etc etc. Stuff like that, with out any named sources or evidence.
Reminds me of the whole Rather memo before the 2004 election, you remember, the fake memo and all that.
Just because you want to believe something, does not mean that something is true.

The truth is we do not know what types of drugs Bush used, although pot seems to be a certainty. Beyond that we have NO clue at all. And Donvito, do you have ANY evidence at all that Bush sold coke?
All you found were allegations? Buch denied using cocaine after 1992, then extended the cocaine-free period back to 1974. A denial like this is an admission that he used cocaine BEFORE 1974.

 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Bush is smart because he never admitted to anything.

And it's never been proven either. But, hey, if a few bloggers posted it then it must be true, right?

Of course Bush could go on record and deny it all, but for some strange reason he won't clear himself with a simple denial, he just gives his usual song and dance act on the subject.

I'd think a CPA could add 2 + 2??
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Genx87
Ask Marion barry how that worked out.

Doing drugs as a young man, then going on to a stellar academic and professional career isn't the same thing as smoking crack while in office.

The point wasnt that he did it, the point was it didnt affect him being re-elected to office.
 

Gigantopithecus

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2004
7,664
0
71
Originally posted by: DonVito
President Bush, on the other hand, allegedly used drugs into his 40s, and has never been willing to even discuss it. He's very much what 12-steppers call a "dry drunk," in that he has apparently stopped using drugs and alcohol without confronting his underlying problems. Moreover, he, unlike Obama, belongs to the party that purportedly stands for law and order, making it curious indeed that he is the first convicted criminal to serve as President, and that he and his VP have three DUIs between them.

Let's not forget the cover up of the fact that Deadeye Dick shot a man in the face while drunk.

A DUI to me is far, far more serious than a dude snorting a line. The dude snorting line presents much less of a threat to me than does a drunk driver.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Genx87
Ask Marion barry how that worked out.

Doing drugs as a young man, then going on to a stellar academic and professional career isn't the same thing as smoking crack while in office.

The point wasnt that he did it, the point was it didnt affect him being re-elected to office.


Ah - I missed your point.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Genx87
Ask Marion barry how that worked out.

Doing drugs as a young man, then going on to a stellar academic and professional career isn't the same thing as smoking crack while in office.

The point wasnt that he did it, the point was it didnt affect him being re-elected to office.


Ah - I missed your point.

I suppose my point wasnt made very well either hehe.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: palehorse74
I see nothing wrong with Obama's early mistakes; just as long as drugs didnt play a role in his later years. Now, if it comes to the surface that he was still doing it 5 years ago, then it will be an issue. If not, then it's no big deal.

Kids are entitled to make small mistakes. I know that I made a few myself, and I'd hate to be judged for them 30 years later. That would be ridiculous. I don't care what small mistakes someone made when they were really young, not even the President. (This goes for Clinton, Bush, Obama, or anyone else who made small mistakes in HS or college).

bottom line: it wont stop him from winning any elections.

 

thraashman

Lifer
Apr 10, 2000
11,112
1,587
126
The reason here people aren't up in arms over Obama doing cocaine isn't liberal hypocrisy, it's because the reason most people get mad about a political figure doing this stuff is the secresy. Clinton said he didn't inhale, Bush dances words around and heavily insinuates use but never admits, Obama comes straight forward, without anyone asking him and no new story breaking about it, and he admits his use freely. This goes a long way towards making people forgive him. It was something done 20 years ago, he admitted to it, he acknowledged it was stupid. Why continue to persecute a man for something he did so long ago and has not tried to hide.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
The claim (which is admittedly the product of unnamed sources) is that Bush was selling cocaine at a fairly high level (ounce quantities) in New Haven. I don't honestly know whether it's true. He is also reputed to have used cocaine on many occasions at Camp David when his father was President, when he was in his early 40s (the latter accusation has in fact been verified by Doubleday, who published Kitty Kelley's book about the Bush family).
Donvito, you are now using Kitty Kelly as a source of information? Are you going to start quoting the National Enquire next?

From Wikipedia: ""The Family" provoked another firestorm of publicity due to its allegations, allegedly supplied by Sharon Bush (although Mrs. Bush denied making the allegation,), that George W. Bush snorted cocaine with his brothers at Camp David during his father's presidency. The book also claimed that First Lady Laura Bush dealt drugs in college. Kelley was widely attacked in the media for the book, with charges of partisanship and challenges to her credibility. "

Yes, she has never lost a libel case, but you of all people should know how hard it is to win libel cases in America.
Her book on the British Royalty was never published in the UK because of libel fears.

Question for you: If the allegation that Bush did coke at Camp David pushed by a tabloid type writer lowers your opinion of him, then what is your opinion of Clinton after he was accused of Rape? At least in the Clinton case the accuser is not some unnamed source hiding their identity.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: DonVito
The claim (which is admittedly the product of unnamed sources) is that Bush was selling cocaine at a fairly high level (ounce quantities) in New Haven. I don't honestly know whether it's true. He is also reputed to have used cocaine on many occasions at Camp David when his father was President, when he was in his early 40s (the latter accusation has in fact been verified by Doubleday, who published Kitty Kelley's book about the Bush family).
Donvito, you are now using Kitty Kelly as a source of information? Are you going to start quoting the National Enquire next?

From Wikipedia: ""The Family" provoked another firestorm of publicity due to its allegations, allegedly supplied by Sharon Bush (although Mrs. Bush denied making the allegation,), that George W. Bush snorted cocaine with his brothers at Camp David during his father's presidency. The book also claimed that First Lady Laura Bush dealt drugs in college. Kelley was widely attacked in the media for the book, with charges of partisanship and challenges to her credibility. "

Yes, she has never lost a libel case, but you of all people should know how hard it is to win libel cases in America.
Her book on the British Royalty was never published in the UK because of libel fears.

Question for you: If the allegation that Bush did coke at Camp David pushed by a tabloid type writer lowers your opinion of him, then what is your opinion of Clinton after he was accused of Rape? At least in the Clinton case the accuser is not some unnamed source hiding their identity.

Clinton defended himself head-on against these charges, and in spite of the fact that there was a known accuser he was never criminally charged, much less convicted.

Bush has been interviewed repeatedly about cocaine use and has never denied it (though he has, as zephyrprime points out, changed the date after which he claims not to have used it). I frankly believe the allegations in the Kelley book, and again, it would surprise me if Doubleday knowingly published defamatory material about the President.

In response to your question, Bush's cocaine use (which is adequately well documented that I believe it occurred) doesn't really affect my opinion of him - I regard him as a marginal human being (indeed, probably less bright and certainly less intellectually curious than the average college graduate) and one of our worst-ever Presidents, and I'd say the same thing if he were a teetotaler.

I think your professed disappointment with Obama, combined with your unwillingness to concede President Bush's own misdeeds, is essentially the same thing as your feigned horror at gay groups exposing allegedly gay Congressional staffers, while you yourself do the same thing. I'm not convinced even you know what you believe in.

In what sense are you a "professor"?
 

Stoneburner

Diamond Member
May 29, 2003
3,491
0
76
Everybody knows bush did coke. It was written about in several books, there are his fellow college students who witnessed it, and bush's lack of a denial is pretty much a confirmation. Why argue a nonpoint? OJ never ADMITTED killing anybody but everybody assumes he did it...

THe only question is at what date he stopped sniffing. The unofficial official line is sometime in the 70's though some have said he kept up until the late 80's.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Sadly, I agree with Donvito. This is unlikely to have much effect. This is not so much a swipe at Obama, but a swipe at America as a country that we now find it acceptable.
Show me your opposition to Bush in 2000 and 2004 over his drug use before you are permitted to use the word "sadly" there. If you're against it, you need to be against it.
Show me where Bush wrote about using cocaine in a book. Or show me proof of this 'Bush sold coke' accusation.

I actually do not remember any stories about Bush and cocaine. I think he decision to not talk about anything worked in his favor.

I think we all read into his refusal to talk about his past what we wanted. The left, as seen in this thread, assumes he meant coke etc, the right figured he meant pot. Did Gore not also admit to smoking pot while in Vietnam? I am not sure, but I thought that was the story.

It would be nice if we could find someone who did neither.

Morning friend!!
You forget one thing....
Craig234 will tell you that circusmtantial or whimsicle evidence even without proof is good enough to nail Bush......in other words there are no rules to what Craig234 postulates other than everyone else is held to a higher standard of proof than he himself is!!
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Do people really think that the fact that he tried coke once 11 years ago will impact his ability to effectively govern?
Or is it just about the fact that he made a mistake?
Do we only elect men who have never done anything wrong in their lives?
Seriously.

I think his campaign is doomed because people will realize that he is way too inexperienced to be president, he's pretty much out of his league already.

:thumbsup:
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
It will interesting to see how this plays out. It is common knowledge that Bush WAS a heavy duty coke head, but he has never publically expressly admitted it (to the best of my knowledge). Obama, OTOH, publically admits to a single experiment.

From my personal viewpoint, and in a rational world, this should be insignificant. But you can never tell in politics.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,760
6,767
126
Perhaps we will get a President who will push to decriminalize drugs. God would that be fantastic. We could stop the moronic hypocrisy that is filling our jails with non criminal people and do away with another factor destroying our nation.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Moonie: I don't buy it. I always hear this "filling our jails" line - but if you look at the statistics, yes the Federal jails are being filled with drug offenders (2002 numbers say about 50%), but Federal numbers are very small (140K) compared to state numbers (1.2M). In state, drug offenses are only 20% of total sentencings (again 2002 numbers) which is actually down from 1995. Jail numbers are growing primarily because of increases in violent crime.

Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/p02.pdf
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Drug use "Dooming" Obama's campaign?

Firstly, this interest in drug use of people years ago when they were young really annoys me.

Secondly, any long ago drug use is not his problem, 800K people (that's how many of his books have sold) are already familiar with this. It's old and IMHO a non-story.

Inexperience is his #1 campaign problem.

BTW: People always refer to him a "black". He's mixed race like Tiger Woods. Why don't they say "mixed race"?

Fern
 

Gigantopithecus

Diamond Member
Dec 14, 2004
7,664
0
71
Originally posted by: alchemize
Moonie: I don't buy it. I always hear this "filling our jails" line - but if you look at the statistics, yes the Federal jails are being filled with drug offenders (2002 numbers say about 50%), but Federal numbers are very small (140K) compared to state numbers (1.2M). In state, drug offenses are only 20% of total sentencings (again 2002 numbers) which is actually down from 1995. Jail numbers are growing primarily because of increases in violent crime.

Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/p02.pdf

50% of Federal prisoners & 20% of state prisoners sounds a lot like 'filling' to me. I don't even want to know how much $$$ is wasted keeping dope smokers behind bars; how often are murderers, rapists, armed robbers, etc. let out of prison early to keep those horrifying three strikes potheads off the streets?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,989
55,398
136
Inexperience is not a problem. Not a problem at all. The funny thing is that if they are experienced... then they are "washington insiders that have been corrupted by the system". Nearly everyone on here has already made up their mind about the people running for president based largely on party affiliation, and now they are just seeking for reasons to justify their decision.
 

Jadow

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2003
5,962
2
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Sadly, I agree with Donvito. This is unlikely to have much effect. This is not so much a swipe at Obama, but a swipe at America as a country that we now find it acceptable.


Do you find it acceptable that President Bush took and apparently sold drugs, including cocaine?

please name an objective source for this
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Jadow
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Sadly, I agree with Donvito. This is unlikely to have much effect. This is not so much a swipe at Obama, but a swipe at America as a country that we now find it acceptable.


Do you find it acceptable that President Bush took and apparently sold drugs, including cocaine?

please name an objective source for this

Nobody who has made this allegation allows themselves to be named. Perhaps that means it's not true. I don't think it's really in controversy that President Bush was a cocaine user, but his drug dealing is not as demonstrably true.