Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Craig, after this thread started I headed over to Google and wikipedia to see what I could find on Bush and cocaine. And what I found? Not much. Just a bunch of allegations with very little proof behind them. Bush was arrested in 1974 and daddy had his record cleared etc etc. Stuff like that, with out any named sources or evidence.
Reminds me of the whole Rather memo before the 2004 election, you remember, the fake memo and all that.
Just because you want to believe something, does not mean that something is true.
John, you're not in a position to lecture about wanting to believe something not making it true. I've done nothing to indicate that; it's more useful for you.
Further evidence that he used drugs illegally is that he refused the physical the first year it added drug testing, despite that being a serious offense; and the date of his time he refuses to discuss lies shortly after that period with the drug test. The picture becomes pretty clear about some drug.
You mention the Rather story - the story where there was plenty of solid evidence for the main points outside the memo, and the memo's content was called accurate by the officer's secretary, whether or not the copy of the memo was the original or a later recreation. The huge investigation done by CBS with a republican and the former head of AP was unable to determine whether it was an authentic original. There's still a mystery about who 'leaked' the memo, if it was a campaign ploy by the Bush side.
The truth is we do not know what types of drugs Bush used, although pot seems to be a certainty. Beyond that we have NO clue at all.
Yo have no reason as far as I know to say that marijuana is 'in' but not cocaine; what we know is that he almost certainly used illegal drugs which could either or both.
Bush specifially refused to deny cocaine.