- Jul 3, 2008
- 8,444
- 1
- 0
In a case freighted with major constitutional implications, a federal appeals court on Friday overturned President Obamas controversial recess appointments from last year, ruling he abused his powers and acted when the Senate was not actually in a recess.
The three-judge panels ruling is a major blow to Mr. Obama. The judges ruled that the appointments Mr. Obama made to the National Labor Relations Board are illegal, and the board no longer has a quorum to operate.
But the ruling has even broader constitutional significance, with the judges arguing that the presidents recess appointment powers dont apply to intrasession appointments those made when Congress has left town for a few days or weeks.
The judges signaled the power only applies after Congress has adjourned sine die, which is a legislative term of art that signals the end to a long work period. In modern times, it means the president could only use his powers when Congress quits business at the end of a year.
The dearth of intrasession appointments in the years and decades following the ratification of the Constitution speaks far more impressively than the history of recent presidential exercise of a supposed power to make such appointments, the judges wrote.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-broke-law-recess-appointments/#ixzz2J0aV0RxJ
I'm glad to see the reins pulled in on one of his most egregious abuses of the Constitution. Hopefully if/when this gets to the SC we'll get the same ruling.