MongGrel
Lifer
- Dec 3, 2013
- 38,466
- 3,067
- 121
It's not important though, well not enough to do something about. How about a tin foil hat?
Of course not.
It's not important though, well not enough to do something about. How about a tin foil hat?
Get a large enough solar flare and Western civilization is utterly fucked. They generally happen once a century and the last one occurred over a century ago so the risk is real and gains in probability as each year passes.
Well it seems the liberal idiot squad on here
The OP is cowering in fear as we speak about this thanks to the muslim traitor in chief.
You ever wonder why you're such a loser in real life?
Well it seems the liberal idiot squad on here know more about EMP threats than the Congressional EMP Commission who is warning us that we're about to get screwed, so we have nothing to worry about.![]()
So much projection. Keep on keeping on!You ever wonder why you're such a loser in real life?
You ever wonder why you're such a loser in real life?
Seriouly ?
It sounds a though you know very little on the subject, personally I've worked on satellite components in the past so know a little about radiation shielding
It would be nice of once in awhile someone would look at the article and think beyond politics and at the natural implications of possible, indeed certain, events and about mitigating their effects.
Needs to be dealt with, nevermind bombs, and I know you know that. People. OY!
Someone please provide a clear, rational, scientific explanation for why EMP risk (both naturally occurring and man-made) poses a greater economic and security risk to the US at this moment vs. Climate change and global warming. Since I am lay public and no expert on this matter (and I doubt most Presidents are experts) I would be reliant on actual quantifiable risk data to make an informed decision before I comment on the Internets. Thank you in advance.
Yes but the article specifically said that the solar flare protections would not be impacted by the change, only the nuclear attack protections. Would you agree that the solar flare protection is vastly more important than the nuclear attack protection?
Someone please provide a clear, rational, scientific explanation for why EMP risk (both naturally occurring and man-made) poses a greater economic and security risk to the US at this moment vs. Climate change and global warming. Since I am lay public and no expert on this matter (and I doubt most Presidents are experts) I would be reliant on actual quantifiable risk data to make an informed decision before I comment on the Internets. Thank you in advance.
Someone please provide a clear, rational, scientific explanation for why EMP risk (both naturally occurring and man-made) poses a greater economic and security risk to the US at this moment vs. Climate change and global warming. Since I am lay public and no expert on this matter (and I doubt most Presidents are experts) I would be reliant on actual quantifiable risk data to make an informed decision before I comment on the Internets. Thank you in advance.
What matters is what is done and left undone. Considering the very real threats it should have been a high priority. It wasn't. If the incoming President doesn't do anything he'll be just as much at fault and neither names or respective party has any mitigation of foolishness.
I'm really pissed that Obama did not use an executive order to build a faraday cage around the earth.This sounds like the arsenic standard where mandating we protect against some given risk level provides a diminishing return. Sometimes you just accept a given level of risk because the cost to mitigate doesn't make business sense.
To be very brief we live in a world that is so overpopulated and complex that we need electronics. Computers, communications, in short everything to do with logistics and most of production. With a sufficiently strong EMP we are knocked backed a hundred years with no recourse and that means famine, disease and death on a scale never seen. The time to recover is estimated at up to 10 years and as many trillion dollars. No time to prepare, no mitigation.
Best to pick between this ^ and pretending to be not conservative so people can't trivially make posts like this one to mock your sort.
So the Obama admin sends 100+ tons of raw uranium to Iran and you boot licking democrats make jokes? wtf is wrong with you?
You may have noticed that not one person really cares. Now have you any insight on the matter being discussed or do I awe you so much that you cannot. In that case, I guess I should be honored that I matter at all to you, but I'm not feeling much either way on the matter.
