Originally posted by: jpeyton
If he picks a strong VP, we'll have 16 years of Democratic rule in the White House, guaranteed. Certify it.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Democrats are in love with raising taxes. That is what they do, and it always comes back to bite them in the ass.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: jpeyton
If he picks a strong VP, we'll have 16 years of Democratic rule in the White House, guaranteed. Certify it.
Yeah, because the Democrats are so damned good at winning re-election. Get back to me when you figure out how many presidents that were democrats got re-elected since Roosevelt? Not counting Clinton. The only reason Clinton did was because of the Republicans holding Congress. There never would have been a balanced budget with Democrats controlling the Executive and Legislative branches of the government.
Democrats are in love with raising taxes. That is what they do, and it always comes back to bite them in the ass. People get tired of being gored and then we get at least two terms of Republicans as a result. People have short memories and usually vote their wallet.
It is unlikely Obama can even get elected anyway.
Originally posted by: RichardE
Are you in the top 5% of earners? If not you will see your taxes fall under Obama...
but since you must be an informed voter you already knew that and are probably in the top 5% which than I understand your bitterness :roll:
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: RichardE
Are you in the top 5% of earners? If not you will see your taxes fall under Obama...
but since you must be an informed voter you already knew that and are probably in the top 5% which than I understand your bitterness :roll:
How will taxes fall when gov't spending will go up?
If Obama wins, he'll appoint Deval Patrick onto his staff, who will implement universal health care for all(like he's done in MA). Expect your taxes to go way up.
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
How will taxes fall when gov't spending will go up?
If Obama wins, he'll appoint Deval Patrick onto his staff, who will implement universal health care for all(like he's done in MA). Expect your taxes to go way up.
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: RichardE
Are you in the top 5% of earners? If not you will see your taxes fall under Obama...
but since you must be an informed voter you already knew that and are probably in the top 5% which than I understand your bitterness :roll:
How will taxes fall when gov't spending will go up?
If Obama wins, he'll appoint Deval Patrick onto his staff, who will implement universal health care for all(like he's done in MA). Expect your taxes to go way up.
Except he has already stated where he will get the money from. Questions which I and others have answered numerous times on this forum and are answered at his website. Jesus, do most voters get all there information from 5 minute FW:fW:FW;FW;FW:FWObamamuslimterrorist will raise your traxes!!"? The information to questions or statements people have can be confirmed or denied with literally 5 minutes of searching but people are too lazy to bother. (Well, my email would never lie to me!)
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
And you do know that those are just assumptions. Put down the Kool-Aid and come back to reality.
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Capt Caveman
Originally posted by: RichardE
Are you in the top 5% of earners? If not you will see your taxes fall under Obama...
but since you must be an informed voter you already knew that and are probably in the top 5% which than I understand your bitterness :roll:
How will taxes fall when gov't spending will go up?
If Obama wins, he'll appoint Deval Patrick onto his staff, who will implement universal health care for all(like he's done in MA). Expect your taxes to go way up.
Except he has already stated where he will get the money from. Questions which I and others have answered numerous times on this forum and are answered at his website. Jesus, do most voters get all there information from 5 minute FW:fW:FW;FW;FW:FWObamamuslimterrorist will raise your traxes!!"? The information to questions or statements people have can be confirmed or denied with literally 5 minutes of searching but people are too lazy to bother. (Well, my email would never lie to me!)
And you do know that those are just assumptions. Put down the Kool-Aid and come back to reality.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: jpeyton
If he picks a strong VP, we'll have 16 years of Democratic rule in the White House, guaranteed. Certify it.
Yeah, because the Democrats are so damned good at winning re-election. Get back to me when you figure out how many presidents that were democrats got re-elected since Roosevelt? Not counting Clinton. The only reason Clinton did was because of the Republicans holding Congress. There never would have been a balanced budget with Democrats controlling the Executive and Legislative branches of the government.
Democrats are in love with raising taxes. That is what they do, and it always comes back to bite them in the ass. People get tired of being gored and then we get at least two terms of Republicans as a result. People have short memories and usually vote their wallet.
It is unlikely Obama can even get elected anyway.
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: jpeyton
If he picks a strong VP, we'll have 16 years of Democratic rule in the White House, guaranteed. Certify it.
Yeah, because the Democrats are so damned good at winning re-election. Get back to me when you figure out how many presidents that were democrats got re-elected since Roosevelt? Not counting Clinton. The only reason Clinton did was because of the Republicans holding Congress. There never would have been a balanced budget with Democrats controlling the Executive and Legislative branches of the government.
Democrats are in love with raising taxes. That is what they do, and it always comes back to bite them in the ass. People get tired of being gored and then we get at least two terms of Republicans as a result. People have short memories and usually vote their wallet.
It is unlikely Obama can even get elected anyway.
Originally posted by: loki8481
jesus, he hasn't served a day and you already want him in the oval office for 12 years?
GWB is probably the best argument for term limits there is.
Originally posted by: SlingXShot
Franklin D. Roosevelt ran for what 4 terms... he made so many changes..
In my opinion presidents should run more than 2 terms, and no limit. Because what happens if people want a great president to run 3rd term and they can't choose?
I am against that presidents can run only 2 terms..
Originally posted by: BansheeX
Originally posted by: SlingXShot
Franklin D. Roosevelt ran for what 4 terms... he made so many changes..
In my opinion presidents should run more than 2 terms, and no limit. Because what happens if people want a great president to run 3rd term and they can't choose?
I am against that presidents can run only 2 terms..
Oh, hurray, the benevolent dictator argument. You're a smart one.
By the way, FDR is tied with Bush for being the most destructive and immoral president in the last 100 years. Complete disregard for the constitution, perpetuated an already unnecessary depression by trying to get the government to run the economy, confiscated Americans' gold, absolved banks of having to pay back depositors after going insolvent, arguably allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor to happen, and started the "New Deal" programs which are essentially a bunch of unsustainable ponzi schemes which not only make no sense but are well on their way to bankrupting this country.
Yes, I will be pissing on this man's grave before I die.
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: BansheeX
Originally posted by: SlingXShot
Franklin D. Roosevelt ran for what 4 terms... he made so many changes..
In my opinion presidents should run more than 2 terms, and no limit. Because what happens if people want a great president to run 3rd term and they can't choose?
I am against that presidents can run only 2 terms..
Oh, hurray, the benevolent dictator argument. You're a smart one.
By the way, FDR is tied with Bush for being the most destructive and immoral president in the last 100 years. Complete disregard for the constitution, perpetuated an already unnecessary depression by trying to get the government to run the economy, confiscated Americans' gold, absolved banks of having to pay back depositors after going insolvent, arguably allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor to happen, and started the "New Deal" programs which are essentially a bunch of unsustainable ponzi schemes which not only make no sense but are well on their way to bankrupting this country.
Yes, I will be pissing on this man's grave before I die.
The new deal programs are arguably what enabled this country to achieve the level of productivity and modernity that pushed it to be a super power..
Originally posted by: BansheeX
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: BansheeX
Originally posted by: SlingXShot
Franklin D. Roosevelt ran for what 4 terms... he made so many changes..
In my opinion presidents should run more than 2 terms, and no limit. Because what happens if people want a great president to run 3rd term and they can't choose?
I am against that presidents can run only 2 terms..
Oh, hurray, the benevolent dictator argument. You're a smart one.
By the way, FDR is tied with Bush for being the most destructive and immoral president in the last 100 years. Complete disregard for the constitution, perpetuated an already unnecessary depression by trying to get the government to run the economy, confiscated Americans' gold, absolved banks of having to pay back depositors after going insolvent, arguably allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor to happen, and started the "New Deal" programs which are essentially a bunch of unsustainable ponzi schemes which not only make no sense but are well on their way to bankrupting this country.
Yes, I will be pissing on this man's grave before I die.
The new deal programs are arguably what enabled this country to achieve the level of productivity and modernity that pushed it to be a super power..
Attributing post-war economic growth and prosperity to a man who for eight years helped bring this country and its economy to its knees is nothing short of ridiculous. If it weren't for the war bringing his government-run economy under a singular manageable goal overriding the diverse demands of millions of people, the last two terms of his presidency would have been exactly like the first - complete misery. America's sustained growth before and after those periods are simply a result of greater economic freedom relative to the rest of the world at the time, private property rights, and a system of courts for recourse. It's true, ponzi schemes like SS always appear to be working at first, that's the whole point. Now comes the harsh reality for the people further and further down the chain: http://youtube.com/watch?v=OS2fI2p9iVs
Originally posted by: SlingXShot
The issue is that, lets say Obama gets elected and after Obama another freak republican gets elected and does same damage as GWB?
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: SlingXShot
The issue is that, lets say Obama gets elected and after Obama another freak republican gets elected and does same damage as GWB?
Yes because all Republicans are bad presidents. Well fuck, why don't we just elect the minority democrat every 4 years to appease everyone's guilty conscience.
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: Ronstang
Originally posted by: jpeyton
If he picks a strong VP, we'll have 16 years of Democratic rule in the White House, guaranteed. Certify it.
Yeah, because the Democrats are so damned good at winning re-election. Get back to me when you figure out how many presidents that were democrats got re-elected since Roosevelt? Not counting Clinton. The only reason Clinton did was because of the Republicans holding Congress. There never would have been a balanced budget with Democrats controlling the Executive and Legislative branches of the government.
Democrats are in love with raising taxes. That is what they do, and it always comes back to bite them in the ass. People get tired of being gored and then we get at least two terms of Republicans as a result. People have short memories and usually vote their wallet.
It is unlikely Obama can even get elected anyway.
Are you in the top 5% of earners? If not you will see your taxes fall under Obama...
but since you must be an informed voter you already knew that and are probably in the top 5% which than I understand your bitterness :roll:
Originally posted by: loki8481
jesus, he hasn't served a day and you already want him in the oval office for 12 years?
GWB is probably the best argument for term limits there is.