• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Obama had Trumps phone tapped?

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
So now the FBI is coming out and asking to disavow this bullshit. So now we have the federal bureaucracy trying to debunk right wing conspiracy theories being propagated by the president over social media.

This guy's mental illness is doing severe damage to our basic system of governance. Again, at what point do conservatives recognize they fucked up?

They knew what they were getting when they voted for him. The GOP in congress knows what he is and won't do anything so they can push their policy agenda.
 
So now the FBI is coming out and asking to disavow this bullshit. So now we have the federal bureaucracy trying to debunk right wing conspiracy theories being propagated by the president over social media.

This guy's mental illness is doing severe damage to our basic system of governance. Again, at what point do conservatives recognize they fucked up?

I'm sure he, his inner circle, and his supporters will just say it's 'fake news' from the libtard deep state/administrative state/swamp/whatever.
 
The unbelievable continues-Devin Nunes, chair of the House Intelligence Committee announces that they are going to investigate Trump's wiretap allegations starting Monday. If you remember, Nunes is the clown who has been stonewalling the Trump-Russia allegations for months, conducting a do-nothing whitewash investigation with no witnesses called or hearings scheduled. He's also the same clown who recently denounced the Russian allegations as nothing-at the request of Reince Priebus, the Chief of Staff for Trump's White House. Going way beyond just a routine coverup now, Nunes is actively using his committee as a Trump proxy. Just another reason we need an independent special prosecutor, and need one now.

http://nypost.com/2017/03/05/house-panel-to-probe-trumps-wiretapping-allegations/
 
The unbelievable continues-Devin Nunes, chair of the House Intelligence Committee announces that they are going to investigate Trump's wiretap allegations starting Monday. If you remember, Nunes is the clown who has been stonewalling the Trump-Russia allegations for months, conducting a do-nothing whitewash investigation with no witnesses called or hearings scheduled. He's also the same clown who recently denounced the Russian allegations as nothing-at the request of Reince Priebus, the Chief of Staff for Trump's White House. Going way beyond just a routine coverup now, Nunes is actively using his committee as a Trump proxy. Just another reason we need an independent special prosecutor, and need one now.

http://nypost.com/2017/03/05/house-panel-to-probe-trumps-wiretapping-allegations/
This claim did its job by muddying the investigation waters. Problem is Trump supporters are too stupid to realize Trump has the power to release any "wiretapping" evidence if it exists. No investigation required.

Why are Trump supporters such morons?
 
Obama should sue for libel. Get discovery going and get Trump under oath.

The Internet has failed me: I wanted to post that video from Futurama of this, but text will have to do:

Morbo: Morbo demands an answer to the following question: If you saw delicious candy in the hands of a small child would you seize and consume it?

Johnson: Unthinkable.

Jackson: I wouldn't think of it.

Morbo: What about you, Mr. Nixon? I remind you, you are under a truth-o-scope.

[The truth-o-scope hovers over Nixon's head and he starts to sweat.]
Nixon: Uh, well, I, uh ... the question is-is vague. You don't say what kind of candy, whether anyone is watching or, uh... [He clears his throat.] At any rate, I certainly wouldn't harm the child.

[The truth-o-scope beeps.]
 
This reminds me of something; How easily Trump trashes everyone but Putin. Why is that he has never had 1 bad word to say about Putin?
 
The Internet has failed me: I wanted to post that video from Futurama of this, but text will have to do:

Morbo: Morbo demands an answer to the following question: If you saw delicious candy in the hands of a small child would you seize and consume it?

Johnson: Unthinkable.

Jackson: I wouldn't think of it.

Morbo: What about you, Mr. Nixon? I remind you, you are under a truth-o-scope.

[The truth-o-scope hovers over Nixon's head and he starts to sweat.]
Nixon: Uh, well, I, uh ... the question is-is vague. You don't say what kind of candy, whether anyone is watching or, uh... [He clears his throat.] At any rate, I certainly wouldn't harm the child.

[The truth-o-scope beeps.]


Aroooo!
 
This is the same president that said Obama was a secret Kenyan and 3 million illegal votes were cast for Hillary. Unhinged wouldn't even begin to describe Donald.
 
I wonder how many times Trump has fallen for the Nigerian Prince email scam.
Can somebody make me a meme of that? I have a dozen or so Conservative friends that just LOVE their memes on Facebook.
 
I wonder how many times Trump has fallen for the Nigerian Prince email scam.
Can somebody make me a meme of that? I have a dozen or so Conservative friends that just LOVE their memes on Facebook.
trump-nigerian-email-scam.gif
 
This is the same president that said Obama was a secret Kenyan and 3 million illegal votes were cast for Hillary. Unhinged wouldn't even begin to describe Donald.

Two issues, one is the credibility of the government concerning wiretaps. Comey "forgot" critical things in testimony and Obama lied when he said no US citizen had been harmed by domestic surveillance. Look up "parallel construction" for the latter.

There is no credibility, no "well if they asked for a warrant the party must have done something". Yeah and when you are arrested you must be guilty. No

With that said-

If Trump "knows" then he has evidence. If he has that then he can make it public as he can control classification of documents. He could say "I have been targeted and here is the proof". Nope. Just like "well if they took action there must be some truth", that is not acceptable. The burden of proof is on the accuser and in this case he has the power to reveal any facts he sees fit. Nothing.

Credibility? BWHAHAHA.
 
Back
Top