lupi
Lifer
- Apr 8, 2001
- 32,539
- 260
- 126
Best line ever. We've already decided to file suit, now we're reading the law to find out why we're filing suit.
they vote on legislation that way, why stop with other legal matters.
Best line ever. We've already decided to file suit, now we're reading the law to find out why we're filing suit.
It probably makes sense legally but I agree with you wingnuts, this makes no sense politically. I don't think this is a popular move with Hispanics at all, only the far left.
A non-citizen shouldn't be issued a dl in the first place
Sounds vaguely familiar. I seem to remember something about passing the bill so we can find out what's in it?Best line ever. We've already decided to file suit, now we're reading the law to find out why we're filing suit.
At least this is Administration is trying to hold up justice and equality unlike the previous one.
I can't wait until this is law repealed. Freedom!
At least this is Administration is trying to hold up justice and equality unlike the previous one.
I can't wait until this is law repealed. Freedom!
I'm late to the Obama hate circlejerk it seems.
There are a few issues with the law, that most of the right leaning posters here love to ignore.
1. The law allows the officer on the scene's discretion to make the call on who to ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency. This leaves the whole thing a gaping hole for abuse. Personally, I don't give a flying fuck. I want people who broke our laws that are here illegally dealt with in the harshest method possible. Under the constraints desired by progressives, no individual would ever be arrested unless they turned themselves in and even then it would be unlikely.
2. Drivers Licenses from a good number of states are NOT proof of citizenship. A US citizen from another state could be held until they are able to produce that proof. This talking point is too ignorant to warrant comment.
3. As stated before immigration enforcement is left up to the feds. For the five thousandth time, they're not doing it. They're not because until recently, the minority in this country felt they could run roughshod over the desires of the majority. That's changing and for the better. If the feds had done their job, we wouldn't be talking about this.
troll more.
justice is what this law is doing.
equality? Why should I be supporting illegals with my hard earned money, while they cant go through LEGAL processes to become citizens.
I cant wait till obama gets his shit shoveled in his face with this. There is NO way in HELL the Supreme Court will side with obama on this. If they do, then it will be safe to assume the Supreme Court is NOT doing its sole job.
My comments in bold.
Disclaimer: I'm a right leaning poster.
The law is inheritely racist, and will be struck down by the courts despite and somewhat conservative leaning court even.
Congrats on being a stupid liberal wise and beautiful woman.Congratulations being a fascist douche monger.
Congratulations being a fascist douche monger.
I've been called far worse. I have to have at least a smidgen of respect for someone for it to even begin to have any influence on me. Comprende?Congratulations being a fascist douche monger.
The law is inheritely racist, and will be struck down by the courts despite and somewhat conservative leaning court even.
they vote on legislation that way, why stop with other legal matters.
Excellent points. I guess this is business as usual.Sounds vaguely familiar. I seem to remember something about passing the bill so we can find out what's in it?
Zounds! A cop being empowered to ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency? A gaping hole for abuse! We must ensure that only people who aren't there and will never ask proof of citizenship or legal residency are empowered to ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency! Only then can we reach the Holy Grail of society, having laws and making sure they aren't enforced.I'm late to the Obama hate circlejerk it seems.
There are a few issues with the law, that most of the right leaning posters here love to ignore.
1. The law allows the officer on the scene's discretion to make the call on who to ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency. This leaves the whole thing a gaping hole for abuse.
2. Drivers Licenses from a good number of states are NOT proof of citizenship. A US citizen from another state could be held until they are able to produce that proof.
3. As stated before immigration enforcement is left up to the feds.
Typical for this administration... thumb it's nose at the people and insult them by asserting that it's only racists that can support the rule of law.
It's only inherently racist if you're racist enough to assume that all illegals are of a different race. It's not inherently racist if you realize that while Mexicans and Central Americans make up a majority of our illegals they are far from the only ones. I've met illegal Brits, Canadians, Irish, Russians, etc on top of the illegals I've met from Mexico and various parts of Central America. So if you're racist to assume that all illegals are Mexican, then sure this is inherently racist.
boomerang said:Personally, I don't give a flying fuck. I want people who broke our laws that are here illegally dealt with in the harshest method possible. Under the constraints desired by progressives, no individual would ever be arrested unless they turned themselves in and even then it would be unlikely.
werepossum said:Zounds! A cop being empowered to ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency? A gaping hole for abuse! We must ensure that only people who aren't there and will never ask proof of citizenship or legal residency are empowered to ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency! Only then can we reach the Holy Grail of society, having laws and making sure they aren't enforced.
Excellent points. I guess this is business as usual.
Zounds! A cop being empowered to ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency? A gaping hole for abuse! We must ensure that only people who aren't there and will never ask proof of citizenship or legal residency are empowered to ask for proof of citizenship or legal residency! Only then can we reach the Holy Grail of society, having laws and making sure they aren't enforced.
During Prohibition the Democrat Party's platform on prohibition was (paraphrased) "The Democrat Party is in favor of laws prohibiting the manufacture and sale of alcohol, but we are against their enforcement." It's good to see that the Dems have such respect for that tradition that they are spreading its doctrine to other areas of law.