• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Obama admin committed an act of war against Iran

B

bfdd

Lifer
and there aren't protests in the street about it.

How come everyone seems "a-ok" with our Government involvement with Stuxnet and the attack on Iran?
 
Not sure, but I think it might have something to do with most of us realizing that a nuclear armed Iran would be a Very Bad Thing (TM).
 
Iran committed an act of war against us first, by arming insurgents in Iraq.

That, and it was a more humane way for us to slow the progress their nuclear ambitions than using cruise missiles.
 
it's become standard operating procedure in the Presidency that you can do whatever you want to brown people and the American public won't care, whether you're talking about torturing them, assassinating American citizens without due process, or re-classifying civilians as enemy combatants after killing them.
 
loki8481 said:
it's become standard operating procedure in the Presidency that you can do whatever you want to brown people and the American public won't care, whether you're talking about torturing them, assassinating American citizens without due process, or re-classifying civilians as enemy combatants after killing them.
Click to expand...

Obama looks rather brown to me.
 
bfdd said:
and there aren't protests in the street about it.

How come everyone seems "a-ok" with our Government involvement with Stuxnet and the attack on Iran?
Click to expand...

Anti-war protesters stopped marching once Dubya was out of office. Obama can commit acts of war, perform assassination by Predator drone, and carry on Guantanamo with impunity since he's a Democrat. Don't worry, the peaceniks will come back out to play once a Republican occupies the White House again.
 
bfdd said:
and there aren't protests in the street about it.

How come everyone seems "a-ok" with our Government involvement with Stuxnet and the attack on Iran?
Click to expand...

Because we as a nation have agreed that Iran is a bad country, full of bad guys, so we can do whatever we want to them. It's really just a countdown to war.
 
because obama is a democrat. That simple. Bush to this day is called out for a totureing a few. Obama just kills a target and everyone in the area with a drone and it a-ok.
 
Jeesh, if we call Obama out on it, we'll be labeled as raaaaacists. Plus, in the future we can refer to him as a war mongering killer of innocent civilians that was our former traitor in chief. We can call for his imprisonment for war crimes, etc., etc.

What's good for the goose...
 
I love the smell of butt-hurt in the morning. Poor little impotent children, still seething with rage that the public rejected their hero but accept their arch-enemy, President Democrat. Never mind that Bush used false allegations to launch a unilateral, unprovoked, full-scale invasion that triggered the deaths of thousands of Americans, hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children, and cost Americans somewhere north of a trillion dollars, while President Democrat has instead used precision and moderation. No, such nuance, though blatantly obvious to anyone with more than three working neurons, somehow is beyond the grasp of the brain dead partisan drones who have been programmed for one simple task: HATE PRESIDENT DEMOCRAT. HATE PRESIDENT DEMOCRAT.

But wait, there's more. Those who actually pay attention to what's going on instead of kneeling before the RNC slime machine, eagerly guzzling whatever they're pushing today, know that Stuxnet was launched under the Bush administration, NOT Obama. Obama approved continuing the program after it leaked into the wild, but he didn't start it. Oops. More outrage fail.

You know you guys are a total joke, right?
 
Obama cannot do warlike things - he has a Nobel Peace Prize...one he received while he was increasing the number of people actively involved in waging war.
 
Butt hurt...lol. Seems you have an s&m fetish for other men's butts.

You DO know Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize while he was increasing the number of US troops engages in warfare, right?
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
Stuxnet was a neat trick, but act of war?

How about this?
China declares WWIII - "Operation Shady RAT"

When do the nukes fly?
Click to expand...

Yes, cyber attacks can be considered acts of war just like physical attacks. It is actually a significant grounds for concern since it gives Iran a basis for claiming the U.S. and Israel struck first. It's a shame the OP chose to launch this thread with such a turd of a troll, because it could be a quite interesting discussion.
 
cybrsage said:
Obama cannot do warlike things - he has a Nobel Peace Prize...one he received while he was increasing the number of people actively involved in waging war.
Click to expand...

pff.... he does the same things bush was doing which is why the presidency really doesn't matter. I didn't vote for a black democrat president to have him drone striking and starting more wars.
 
cybrsage said:
Butt hurt...lol. Seems you have an s&m fetish for other men's butts.
Click to expand...
No, but you seem to have a childish compulsion to pervert anything you can into sexual innuendo. Typical for teenage boys, not so much for adults. Perhaps you will grow out of it.


You DO know Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize while he was increasing the number of US troops engages in warfare, right?
Click to expand...
Yes, and I'm fully committed to not re-electing the Nobel committee. No, wait, i actually don't care about that or your mindless hate. Your desperate attempt to derail the thread is noted, however.
 
Bowfinger said:
Yes, cyber attacks can be considered acts of war just like physical attacks. It is actually a significant grounds for concern since it gives Iran a basis for claiming the U.S. and Israel struck first. It's a shame the OP chose to launch this thread with such a turd of a troll, because it could be a quite interesting discussion.
Click to expand...

Iran has no basis for such a claim. There is plenty of physical evidence of Iran's involvement against U.S. troops in Iraq since 2003-2004.
 
airdata said:
pff.... he does the same things bush was doing which is why the presidency really doesn't matter. I didn't vote for a black democrat president to have him drone striking and starting more wars.
Click to expand...

Stop believing your RNC talking points you butt hurt partisan! I have been told on this forum because drone strikes are cheap it is ok to kill brown people and US citizens in foreign nations.
 
Bowfinger said:
No, but you seem to have a childish compulsion to pervert anything you can into sexual innuendo. Typical for teenage boys, not so much for adults. Perhaps you will grow out of it.
Click to expand...

Not my fault you are the one who keeps talking about men and hurt butts. I heard there is a genetic predisposition for such a fetish.


Yes, and I'm fully committed to not re-electing the Nobel committee. No, wait, i actually don't care about that or your mindless hate. Your desperate attempt to derail the thread is noted, however.
Click to expand...

Your messiah accepted it - which means he agreed with them.

And YOU are the one who brought up the butt hurting of other men...and then claim I am derailing the thread. Is it a double standard (you can do it and it is ok, but others doing it is wrong), or is it standard hypocrisy (no one can do it, but you do it anyway)?

Obama also claims that blowing up tanks and killing soldiers is not military agression and therefor does not need to follow the War Powers Act. You knew this, right? If killing enemy soldiers is not military aggression, then stuxnet is not either.
 
Missing the whole point.
In todays world the average US citizen is pretty much immune to war.
We don't see it. We don't sacrifice for it. We don't see the dead (on either side).
You might catch it on the nightly news if you look closely, right between the fish with two heads story and the latest celibately sex/drug scandal.
War has been reduced to nothing more than a video game.
You can take it or leave it. It won't involve you.
The only time American citizens get involved with war is when we see the night fire, all gun-ho, give em hell CNN kickoff coverage.
Then it looks pretty damn neat. Pretty colors. USA! USA!
Other than that, we really don't care.
It doesn't have any intrusion on our daily life.

And, by the way, this ho hum attitude will just get more ho hum as war technology advances. We won't care. Why should we? Wars fought using technology will cut most of the cost out of waging war. That might be the one advantage America has over all other countries in the world.
At least for now...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top