BallaTheFeared
Diamond Member
- Nov 15, 2010
- 8,115
- 0
- 71
Doesn't this happen with every thread?
I have owned 3x 7950s and 4 GTX 670s. They both perform well, no doubt. Its the price I mainly have an issue with.
I was under the impression it was 6-9% at the same clocks.
If not than I made a huge mistake buying the 7950![]()
Why do people still bring up the clock for clock argument. I was under the impression that 1000mhz on nvidia != 1000mhz on AMD because of the way they process information.
I am confused here because I thought the 7970 was faster at the same clocks not slower.
I am confused here because I thought the 7970 was faster at the same clocks not slower.
Doesn't this happen with every thread?
You know what Nvidia should do.
$60 in steam credit.
That could go a long way. Especially in steam sales.
You know what Nvidia should do.
$60 in steam credit.
That could go a long way. Especially in steam sales.
You know what Nvidia should do.
$60 in steam credit.
That could go a long way. Especially in steam sales.
Yes, in those 3 games [H] has the 670 faster. I prefer something with more benches though.
There's no perfect review. More data though gives a clearer picture. By more data I mean taking [H]'s review and TPU and additional reputable sites, discounting the outliers.
Will just baited and humped the leg of a fellow member all in the same post. Awesome.
Only took 2 replies for Arkadrel to go off topic and turn it into a pissing match. Shocking.
So, what should you take from this post? The VC&G forum is both awesome and shocking, sarcasm aside of course.
I'm not in the market for a new card, but if I was, I'd much prefer rebates to game bundles. Hope to see more deals like the Asus 660 that was $170AR a couple days ago...
FFS, the 7950 boast is just an overclocked 7950, the 670 can also overclock!
If you're gonna go down that path...I say the 7950 overclocks more than a 670...so it's faster. We're back to that "OCed cards in reviews" argument.
Regardless if the 7950 Boost is just an OCed 7950, the OC is guaranteed from the vendor, just like OCed 670s are. Wouldn't you rather have a guaranteed OC?
During the F2P bundle, you could get a PNY 670 for $280 and sell the bundle for $50.
???
The ftp bundle sells 40 -50 as well (I don't understand why people continually fail to note that). I you take the cheapest 670 at $300 (the crappy pny) then you are at $250-$260. a TF3 costs $310. I bought a 670gtx OC for $340 $30 diff there for what I consider equal quality.
Point being gap is not as big as people keep making it out. It definitely isn't $100+ dollars.
I've read all the posts here and I can't say whether the 7950 OC or the 670 is faster, but I'd wager it's within 10% either way.
The issue is that the 7950 cost me $270 and after selling bioshock/crysis and the associated fees, its a net $220.
Even the cheapest 670 out there is $130 more. I think this is the OP's point: how can nvidia make the 670 more attractive to people like me? If there was a gaming bundle that was equally valuable and made the difference between the cards closer to $60, it would have been a competitive choice, given nvidia's superior drivers, physx and my own preference/history.
But a $220 7950 vs a $350 gtx 670....the choice was made for me.
So you reduce the money from selling AMD bundle but dont do the same for nv? ..........
nVidia's bundle was a piece of crap lol. The last good bundle they had was the one with AC3.
