Jen-Hsun Huang
Yields of 28 are probably the best of any new node that TSMC has ever done. They've done a great job with 28, and I think that it also explains the demand on their 28. It's yielding wonderfully at this point in its ramp.
Why do I get the feeling that you'd need thick skins to participate in Danish forums?
[redacted]
And I still find that sontin writes a load of BS, because he draws conclutions from his own opinions and links to a quarterly result that is worse than the one before, and he calims that is great news.
you fail to see where they will get the income.
boo-hooo cry me a river
in an extremely difficult and supply constrained transitional quarter they earned $60M net income
look at the 670 and you will see that margins will be higher then Fermi, once supply issue is dealt with
The gross margins is perhaps better for kepler than fermi, even regardless of wafer pricing model, but the kepler line, is tied to a very little segment of the market. And besides 28nm demand will continue to be strong. And the 40nm tegra 3 is comming into competion over its head.
The revenue will probably be 4+ and so what? The net income is going down. I fail to see where they will get the income. ?? i dont care about guidance, but there must be something in it or what?
Income is what its about, and what NV have been good at. Earning money (hell they used to be a money cannon). Now they are just getting into the same highly compettive mess as AMD.
Where is the transistion leading?
They are selling every 28nm GPU. The Kepler market is big enough that they expect a lack of supply until end of the year.
Lol? They made $60 Millions last quarter. So what is the problem? nVidia has nearly $3 Billions in Cash and no debt.
nVidia is increasing their revenue and their gross margin. AMD did not archived this over the last few years. Now they have more money to spend. That's the reason why the opex increased.
Anandtech:
"For the first quarter of FY2013 NVIDIA booked $924M in revenue, with a net income of $60M. This is compared to $962M in revenue with $135M in net income for Q1 of FY2012, meaing for a year-over-year basis NVIDIAs revenue is slightly down while their net income has taken a larger hit."
That was better than analyst expected. But is that nessesary a good sign? If its because more than expected of income is from lower end, where is the progress to come from? IB and Trinity is comming big time?, and pitcarn is very effective mm2/perf.
I have trouble seeing how both NV and AMD can earn any serious margins in this compettitive market. They are both hard pressed now.
Earning is just down the drain now, the good times is over. For most that just means the prices will stay high for the new gfx![]()
I have trouble seeing how both NV and AMD can earn any serious margins in this compettitive market. They are both hard pressed now. Earning is just down the drain now, the good times is over. For most that just means the prices will stay high for the new gfx![]()
Regarding margins, 294mm^2 chip for $400-500 is a lot cheaper to produce than 520 mm^2 chip at $500 even if wafer prices rose 20%