• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

NVIDIA Pascal Thread

Page 119 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
From the chart they showed it looked like ~15-20% to me. Power was at 180 W.

Titan X ~ 3.6 relative performance
1080 ~ 4.2 relative performance.
 
Wow Jen just went on a spiel about how he loves PC gaming because its open standards... Jesus lol. So.. Gameworks doesn't exist?
 
16nm FinFET GPU
Uses Micron's G5X Memory
Efficiency between 75% and 85%
Faster than 980 SLI! (that means around 75-80% faster than the 980)
180W Power Envelope, ~25-30% Faster than Titan X

Pretty impressive stuff. Better than I expected. Probably means it will come in at $650 rather than $500 like previous x80-series cards.
 
16nm FinFET GPU
Uses Micron's G5X Memory
Efficiency between 75% and 85%
Faster than 980 SLI! (that means around 75-80% faster than the 980)
180W Power Envelope, ~25-30% Faster than Titan X

Pretty impressive stuff. Better than I expected. Probably means it will come in at $650 rather than $500 like previous x80-series cards.

on which test,game benchmark?
 
So basically, we're looking at a GTX 980 launch all over again. Minimal absolute performance gains with a big emphasis on power efficiency.

As for it being faster than GTX 980 SLI, that's not too surprising considering SLI's less than optimal scaling. Side-grade for GTX 980 TI guys. Based on the performance, I'm expecting a $549 price tag.
 
I don't think we'll see it given how he only showed a graph of how powerful 1080 is supposed to be instead of saying much about it. This presentation seems really light on details.

I think you hope they don't give out the release date and pricing info so you can complain, and if they do give it out you'll complain all the same.
 
I just did a bit of pixel counting and got 4.41-4.42 for 1080 and 3.61-3.62 for the Titan X.

So ~22.1% faster than Titan X and 24.7% faster than 980 Ti.

Overall, but if you pick games that use a lot of compute, like Quantum Break, you could see a major blow out. 390 is 50 to 90% faster (90% during combat) than a 970 for example, faster than 980Ti. Pascal will behave very much like GCN in compute heavy games and it will spank Maxwell.
 
Back
Top