Imouto
Golden Member
- Jul 6, 2011
- 1,241
- 2
- 81
So there's no link to what you read?
Is that you, Demo?....lol.I dont know where I read it tbh, I frequent a lot of forums and read a lot of articles and at the time I didnt think much of it.. You need to relax your rabid fanboy fangs and realise I am just reporting what I read, along with stating I dont know if theres any truth to it.. relax buddy.
Now that is funny.I dont know where I read it tbh, I frequent a lot of forums and read a lot of articles and at the time I didnt think much of it.. You need to relax your rabid fanboy fangs and realise I am just reporting what I read, along with stating I dont know if theres any truth to it.. relax buddy.
I didnt make any predictions. I said I read that yeilds were a few % below expected and that I dont know if theres any truth to that.
Okay, so I really don't care about half the crap you guys argue about - since I'm just a consumer who plays games.
What I care about is - because so many opinions are stated as "facts" and I personally lost track of which rumor is the most recent, I just want to know - will mid-range Kepler be out sometime in March or is that also pushed back to April? By Mid-Range, I mean $200-350 price bracket, ie GTX 660.
I had to swap out a failing HDD in the GF's PC and saw her little GTX 460 SC trucking along. We're both in desperate need of upgrades haha. I might just cave and buy Sandy Bridge so both our systems get a long over due upgrade.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT: I'd like to say I'm also sadden by the lack of price cuts. GTX 570/HD 6970 prices don't seem to be budging.![]()
Sadly NOBODY HERE KNOWS.When can I actually buy this gem?
Okay, so I really don't care about half the crap you guys argue about - since I'm just a consumer who plays games.
What I care about is - because so many opinions are stated as "facts" and I personally lost track of which rumor is the most recent, I just want to know - will mid-range Kepler be out sometime in March or is that also pushed back to April? By Mid-Range, I mean $200-350 price bracket, ie GTX 660.
As soon as AMD fills the big hole still left in their gpu lineup, then Nvidia will be late in that area to.Q1 will certainly not be a great start to the year, but once yields improve and more wafer starts become available for 28 nm then the company will start to see a good rise in margins and a lowering of costs. NVIDIA is obviously quite bullish on Kepler and what it will represent to the market. From all the hints running around, NVIDIA will be taking a slightly different road with the design and actual introduction of this part. NVIDIA did share that yields for Kepler on 28 nm is much better than the first Fermi parts coming off of 40 nm.
We can certainly look forward to another very interesting year in desktop, notebook and mobile graphics. Competition will be tough, but some very interesting products will be delivered. NVIDIA looks to remain healthy with a wide variety of products they are offering to the respective markets.
Sadly NOBODY HERE KNOWS.
Any estimate you read about is at present, wishful thinking.
'omeds' being correct will be purely accidental with the available public knowledge.
If you don't get what's wrong with that statement lemme say this:
I read somewhere yields are terrible and Nvidia is going bankrupt but I don't know if there's any truth about this.
Sadly NOBODY HERE KNOWS.
Any estimate you read about is at present, wishful thinking.
'omeds' being correct will be purely accidental with the available public knowledge.
Sadly NOBODY HERE KNOWS.
Any estimate you read about is at present, wishful thinking.
'omeds' being correct will be purely accidental with the available public knowledge.
So there's no link to what you read?
What was let out at the conference call is now being cushioned (Damage Control).
Hey, you said it brother! Nvidia doesn't have a damn thing!
Minor off topic rant for a second, and something that bugged me while using 580s. Nvidia still doesn't allow you to select SSAA within the driver, you have to use an external application. Before some NV guy attacks me, its pretty stupid that it is NOT IN the driver - and you have to use an external app like nvidia inspector. Before anyone starts getting all apologetic, this is something that should really be in the CP and i've posted on the nvidia forums in the past stating such. I don't understand the omission.
In my ideal world AMD would improve their profile program slightly within CCC, while NV would include SSAA and FXAA injection in their driver. (and not require a separate d/l to enable it)
Yes. AMD was very conservative with clocks and power draw for SI. A re-spin combined with a more mature process has a lot of potential to say the least. People are getting excellent overclocks on an immature, poor yielding process, consider what will happen when things get sorted out at TSMC and AMD has had a chance to get to know the process better.
SI also scales very well with clock speed, something in the past was a weakness for AMD.
~210W, they have a good 90W left.![]()
There are lots of ways to measure power usage, but in OCCT Anand has it at 94W less than the 580.
This is what Guru3D posted loaded while gaming. They have room to grow.
![]()
Ryan Smith said:All things considered, outside of warranty restrictions there seems to be very little reason not to overclock the 7970 on its default voltage. Even a conservative overclock of 1050MHz would add 13% to the core clocks (and as a result performance in virtually all GPU-limited scenarios), which is a big enough leap in performance to justify spending the time setting up and testing the overclock. By not raising the core voltage there’s effectively no power/noise tradeoff and this seems to be achievable by virtually every 7970, making this a freebie overclock the likes of which we’re more accustomed to seeing on high-end CPUs than we are flagship GPUs.
Anandtech Article
Nvidia where r u stellarzzz driverzz suproortz ?I've found it's better to see if anyone has found solutions on other forums or in PC gaming forums here, because if you ask about these broke ass nvidia drivers in VC&G - the nvidia fanboys start frothing at the mouth and going ape****.
Excellent :thumbsup:
So this would certainly make for more evidence that TSMC's parametric yields are fine (enough) and that if anything is holding AMD (and thus Nvidia) back it would be the functional yields (again, as expected for a new node which itself is not "broken", merely needs reduction in defect-density).
That also shows how likely it is that AMD's 7970 release was strategic sand-bagging to wait until Kepler showed up before AMD shows their full hand. They can easily release a higher performing single-GPU SKU that goes above 7970 on the basis of a clockspeed bump alone.
It takes two to tango, for every "frothing a the mouth" nvidia fanboy here we also have someone who busies themselves posting inflammatory antagonistic hyperbole to ensure they make their own prophecies come true...
If you take a crap in your toilet, don't get mad at your toilet when your toilet smells like your own crap. :hmm: