nVidia Fermi recomended for Crysis 2 Engine game

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
Last edited:

Dorkenstein

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2004
3,554
0
0
Seems like Nvidia nabs damn near all of these kind of games. It's going to make people buy their cards, though, which is what they're aiming for.
 

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
Seems like Nvidia nabs damn near all of these kind of games. It's going to make people buy their cards, though, which is what they're aiming for.

Well these are the types of games I play,and if they play better on Nvidia hardware I'm in.

I loved Crysis (Warhead especially). I can't wait for this game.
I just hope it isn't so short like MW2 and Bad company 2. I finished them in 2 days.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Well these are the types of games I play,and if they play better on Nvidia hardware I'm in.

I loved Crysis (Warhead especially). I can't wait for this game.
I just hope it isn't so short like MW2 and Bad company 2. I finished them in 2 days.

Well those 2 games are multiplayer games with singleplay thrown in after.
 

Udgnim

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2008
3,681
124
106
so standard practice to recommend Fermi now for all future TWIWMTBP titles?
 

Dorkenstein

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2004
3,554
0
0
I'm dying for an excuse to get back to an Nvidia product. But either A or B will happen. A) The new cards won't be as good as a 58XX whatever or B) They'll be totally awesome and I won't be able to find one in stock for a year.
 

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
I'm dying for an excuse to get back to an Nvidia product. But either A or B will happen. A) The new cards won't be as good as a 58XX whatever or B) They'll be totally awesome and I won't be able to find one in stock for a year.

I'd go with C) Will I be able to afford it?:D
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
So, please explain how this game was optomized to run on Fermi since no working Fermi cards were available to the game developers during the game's creation?
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
Nvidia has great marketing, you have to give them that much. But it seems almost that they're doing more to market their currently non-existent product than get it out the door.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Nvidia has great marketing, you have to give them that much. But it seems almost that they're doing more to market their currently non-existent product than get it out the door.

You forget about renaming again. But hey at least they're consistent and keep doing it.
 

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
So, please explain how this game was optomized to run on Fermi since no working Fermi cards were available to the game developers during the game's creation?

Well if the Crytec 3 engine is optimized for Stereoscopic 3D , it should be Nvidia's baby.

http://www.nvidia.com/object/3D_Vision_Main.html

They are the ones pushing 3d gaming right?
Games like this is what puts new technology on the map.

If the Crytec 3 engine is optimized for Stereoscopic 3D ,Physx, and Tessalation, it could be a big win for Nvidia.

I'm just guessing.
 
Last edited:

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Tessalation isn't an nvidia exclusive. In fact, you could say nvidia is late to that.
 

ZimZum

Golden Member
Aug 2, 2001
1,281
0
76
But the latest news (rumors) says Fermi does it better.

In synthetic benchmarks maybe. In a real game setting where nV cant devote the bulk of its resources to tesselation, not so much.

The tesselation in the DX11 spec is based on ATI's Truform. Which their cards have been capable of since like 2001.
 

Lonbjerg

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2009
4,419
0
0
Seems like Nvidia nabs damn near all of these kind of games. It's going to make people buy their cards, though, which is what they're aiming for.

Yup, TWIMTBP is a success for NVIDIA.

The tight relationships with developers is also why NVIDIA needs less "hotfixes" than AMD.
 

Lonbjerg

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2009
4,419
0
0
In synthetic benchmarks maybe. In a real game setting where nV cant devote the bulk of its resources to tesselation, not so much.

The tesselation in the DX11 spec is based on ATI's Truform. Which their cards have been capable of since like 2001.

NVIDIA tessalation happens in the PolyMorph engine, not it's shaders cores...whats is your point?
Especially since the lastest video show Fermi beating the Evergreens in tessalation?
 

nitromullet

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2004
9,031
36
91
In synthetic benchmarks maybe. In a real game setting where nV cant devote the bulk of its resources to tesselation, not so much.

The tesselation in the DX11 spec is based on ATI's Truform. Which their cards have been capable of since like 2001.

Didn't Unigine work with ATI on the development of Heaven, yet (according to NVIDIA) the GTX 480 tops the 5870?

Also, it's not exactly as if tesselation is the only thing going on in Heaven. I'm not sure if you've run the bench yourself, but it's still pretty resource intensive with tesselation disabled.

Here are the screen caps from the runs I did when I had a 5870. The FPS are shown top-right.

DX11/tesselation (1024x768):

stairs_tess_1.png


DX11/no tesselation (1024x768):

stairs_no_tess_1.png


You can see the fps are certainly higher without tesselation, but they aren't exactly through the roof considering the low res of the bench (which I did for better quality/smaller sized screen shots).
 
Last edited:

happy medium

Lifer
Jun 8, 2003
14,387
480
126
In synthetic benchmarks maybe. In a real game setting where nV cant devote the bulk of its resources to tesselation, not so much.

The tesselation in the DX11 spec is based on ATI's Truform. Which their cards have been capable of since like 2001.

Quote:

"Its certainly not software and there certainly is dedicated tessellation hardware beyond just the HULL/Shader routines."

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=143679

Fermi will have dedicated hardware for Tessalation....

http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=149550