Counter examples for what? Why?
Poster 1: AMD showed they're catching up in RT.
Poster 2: I have no idea where you see AMD is better than Nvidia at all, they just come up with cloned tech years later.
Poster 3: I see you're very susceptible to marketing.
The response to Poster 1 is just a way to deflect their message, by putting words in their mouth and then attempting to change the narrative towards a favorable and sterile exchange. Worse than this, here's the what Poster 1 really had to say:
That's assuming that the existing customers with their massive AI deployments get enough ROI to consider moving to the nextgen as soon as it is released. I have my doubts on that. No one has unlimited money to burn and at some point, the market will be overflowing with used AI hardware which may become affordable for newer startups and cause more disruption for the bigger players, just like Deepseek did.
Jensen seems to be betting on AI demand going on forever but how long before everyone hits some roadblock where almost everyone has the same thing to offer to their paying customers and then the weaker companies start dying off one by one? RDNA4 has shown that Nvidia isn't the end all and be all of RT and if RDNA5 is able to do path tracing as well as or better than RTX 6000 series, Nvidia may face the Geforce FX situation all over again.
Notice how the part about AMD possibly catching up in RT is just a bit of context at the end? Most of what he wrote was about Nvidia focus on AI, it was a
completely different discussion that what
@reb0rn tried to ignite.
@maddie likely noticed the disconnect here and decided to opt for a sarcastic reply instead of the wall of text I'm forced to write in order to prevent an absurd derail of the discussion towards a toxic exchange about how Nvidia innovates and AMD copies.
Most of us are tempted to react to one fo the last replies in the thread without checking the context. It should not be this way, but we do it anyway. I'm guilty of this a lot. This is why I write this knowing very well how the process works:
if you're about to reply to a potentially hot topic, check the context and previous replies. Don't help others derail productive and interesting discussions just because they're annoyed their favorite brand is criticized.
Everybody knows Nvidia pushes tech like crazy. Nobody here deines that. The subject was Nvidia's absolute focus on AI which is clearly hurting their consumer lineup. Stay with the subject, ignore the trolls.
Facebook
Twitter