Nuclear Multi-Core CPU benchmark

Page 8 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Just built this, got parts at MicroCenter, can't believe how good the performance is for so cheap.

Asus P5KPL-CM Mobo ($55.99)
Intel E5200 Retail SLAY7 ($69.99)
4GB OCZ 4-4-4-12 PC6400 DDR2 ($59.99)

Clocked at 3442Mhz (275FSB) Ram at 459.1Mhz (918.2 Effective) @ 5-5-5-14

Stock voltage.

Score : 12199, Checksum ABAIIAEAGECDDB.IGJ
 

alkalinetaupehat

Senior member
Mar 3, 2008
839
0
0
Tried 3.6Ghz and got to 20098 now...mine seems to be a little lackluster compared to other Q9450's at the same clocks.
 

Idontcare

Elite Member
Oct 10, 1999
21,110
59
91
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
My bad. I got the wrong idea when you put the doubled in bold.

It's cool, was just trying to emphasize the numbers. I'm sure the delta would have been even higher if my chip had less cache and was thus even more dependent on FSB speed for this bench.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Just built this, got parts at MicroCenter, can't believe how good the performance is for so cheap.

Asus P5KPL-CM Mobo ($55.99)
Intel E5200 Retail SLAY7 ($69.99)
4GB OCZ 4-4-4-12 PC6400 DDR2 ($59.99)

Clocked at 3442Mhz (275FSB) Ram at 459.1Mhz (918.2 Effective) @ 5-5-5-14

Stock voltage.

Score : 12199, Checksum ABAIIAEAGECDDB.IGJ

Wow, does this program just really hate AMD's? I just 'upgraded' to a Phenom II 805 (mildly overclocked to 3Ghz), same memory, on a Gigabyte 790XUD4P mobo, and this was the result :

10026, Checksum AJJBFABACICJHH.HFH
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Just built this, got parts at MicroCenter, can't believe how good the performance is for so cheap.

Asus P5KPL-CM Mobo ($55.99)
Intel E5200 Retail SLAY7 ($69.99)
4GB OCZ 4-4-4-12 PC6400 DDR2 ($59.99)

Clocked at 3442Mhz (275FSB) Ram at 459.1Mhz (918.2 Effective) @ 5-5-5-14

Stock voltage.

Score : 12199, Checksum ABAIIAEAGECDDB.IGJ

Wow, does this program just really hate AMD's? I just 'upgraded' to a Phenom II 805 (mildly overclocked to 3Ghz), same memory, on a Gigabyte 790XUD4P mobo, and this was the result :

10026, Checksum AJJBFABACICJHH.HFH

My Phenom score wasn't too good in comparrison either. Intel just does better with this one it looks like.

Score: 15418 Checksum: AEDAHBJCDJCFHF.ICJ
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
Bone Stock i7 920 @ 2.67GHz

ALU score 5333
FPU score 7516
MT score 8T 23561

17373
 

jandlecack

Senior member
Apr 25, 2009
244
0
0
i7 920 D0 @ 3.8GHZ (sig system except now at 3.8GHZ instead of 4GHZ due to summer)

Score: 24383

With FW/AV enabled & HT.
 
Dec 30, 2004
12,553
2
76
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Just built this, got parts at MicroCenter, can't believe how good the performance is for so cheap.

Asus P5KPL-CM Mobo ($55.99)
Intel E5200 Retail SLAY7 ($69.99)
4GB OCZ 4-4-4-12 PC6400 DDR2 ($59.99)

Clocked at 3442Mhz (275FSB) Ram at 459.1Mhz (918.2 Effective) @ 5-5-5-14

Stock voltage.

Score : 12199, Checksum ABAIIAEAGECDDB.IGJ

Wow, does this program just really hate AMD's? I just 'upgraded' to a Phenom II 805 (mildly overclocked to 3Ghz), same memory, on a Gigabyte 790XUD4P mobo, and this was the result :

10026, Checksum AJJBFABACICJHH.HFH

My Phenom score wasn't too good in comparrison either. Intel just does better with this one it looks like.

Score: 15418 Checksum: AEDAHBJCDJCFHF.ICJ

Uncore freq doesn't seem to make a diff (rig in sig), I scored 15171, checksum AABBCCDDEEFFGGHH.IJKLOL.
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
8,150
3,087
146
i7 19x190 HT off = 20941
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Originally posted by: soccerballtux


Uncore freq doesn't seem to make a diff (rig in sig), I scored 15171, checksum AABBCCDDEEFFGGHH.IJKLOL.

:laugh:

Is there an updated version that properly recognizes Gainstown?
 

john3850

Golden Member
Oct 19, 2002
1,436
21
81
First run 8x533 = 1400
Next 510x8.5 = 14968
NEXT 516x8.5 = Bsod
Raised volts to 1.475 fsb 1.42 still bsod.
I guess 14968 not bad for a C2 8400.
 

veri745

Golden Member
Oct 11, 2007
1,163
4
81
I'm a little confused. I have a PhII 955 @ 3.7GHz, but the first time I ran this bench, I had cpuz going and it never changed out of my 800MHz CnQ speed.

My first run (800MHz)
ALU: 3799
FPU: 4186
MT: 20782
Total: 14865

My Second run (3700MHz)
ALU: 6610
FPU: 7193
MT: 21582
Total: 16393

It only increases by 10% when my clock goes from 800 -> 3700 MHz?