Nuclear Multi-Core CPU benchmark

[Nathelion]

Same

 

[DukeN]

Link: http://nuc-rus.narod.ru/eng.htm

 

[myocardia]

Originally posted by: DukeN
Link: http://nuc-rus.narod.ru/eng.htm

Fixed link.

 

[Smartazz]

Originally posted by: myocardia

Originally posted by: DukeN
Link: http://nuc-rus.narod.ru/eng.htm

Fixed link.

Thx, downloaded.

 

[jpeyton]

Dual Opteron 2214 / 4GB

ALU 3321
FPU 3930
MT Score 4T 12145
Total 9110

 

[bfdd]

oo I just downloaded this, once I'm done converting two movies to dvd I'll test it out =)

 

[tdawg]

Athlon64 3000+ @ stock 🙂

2837 Marks.

😛

 

[cbuchach]

13080 with my Conroe @ 3531!

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: cbuchach
13080 with my Conroe @ 3531!

I doubt it, but post a screen shot if you can.

 

[Smartazz]

2.4GHZ Athlon X2
6216 Points

 

[bryanW1995]

I can't get the link to work. Does anyone have another?

 

[Mir96TA]

Originally posted by: Mir96TA
P4 EE @ 3.4Gig
Score is 3295

My Core E440 2 Gig with DDR 400 on ASRock
is ALU 3660
FPU 5273
MT 7623
Total 6292

 

[bfdd]

e6600 @ 3.4ghz
ALU Score: 6358
FPU Score: 7069
Multi-Thread Speed: 12663
Total Score: 10519

 

[Smartazz]

6762 Marks with an AMD X2@2.65GHZ.

 

[VirtualLarry]

8748 Mark.

E4400 @ 2.8Ghz on Conroe865PE, 2x1GB DDR400 @ 224Mhz, 2-3-3-8

If this benchmark truely scales equal to "P-Rating", that would put me at equivalent to an 8.748Ghz P4 Northwood.

Scaling the result equal to 2.0Ghz, that gives 6248 - within 50 pts of Mir96TA's score. I was hoping my score might be slightly better due to memory speed, but I guess this benchmark isn't really affected by that.

8775 Mark, after stopping some background programs. Fixing the scaling for the exact freq of my CPU, gives 6273 Marks for 2.0Ghz, closer to Mir96TA.

Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
8782 marks
E6400 @3280

Originally posted by: StopSign
E6300 @ 3190
8838

Originally posted by: Cheex
E6300 @ 3.15GHz (450x7)
Score: 8576

Interesting how my lowly 2.8Ghz DDR system compares to some others - even to a rig @ 3.28 Ghz! Yet mine scales accurately to other DDR400 systems. Is this benchmark finally proof positive that DDR memory is actually MORE efficient than DDR2? It seems that way! This may be a major breakthrough.

 

[bfdd]

I can clock mine down later to 2.8ghz after the fight tonight and see if it compares =)

 

[myocardia]

Originally posted by: bryanW1995
I can't get the link to work. Does anyone have another?

Fixed link.


It seems as if this benchmark really likes the RAM to be ran at 1:1, since my single-core 4000 scores 4,910, and that's with only 1 GB of RAM. I'll have to run it later with my Opteron 170, and see how it does.

 

[undeclared]

Athlon XP 2400+ Mobile @ 2.1GHZ
30,175 marks

 

[vailr]

NuclearRus V. 2.0.0
Total Score: 9846 Mark
E6400 @ 3200 MHz. (8x 400 MHz)
Gigabyte DS3, 2 GB DDR2 PC6400

 

[Idontcare]

Originally posted by: xtwells
Athlon XP 2400+ Mobile @ 2.1GHZ
30,175 marks

You're funny. 😱

 

[Noema]

3735 Total Mark on my Single Core A64 3200 2.2GHz (NewCastle core and 1GB of DDR PC3200 RAM).

Tonight I'll test it on my new Core 2 Duo rig.

 

[Makaveli]

Not a bad score for my rig.

Opteron 170 @ 2.7Ghz w/ DDR500

ALU Score: 4311
FPU Score: 5041
Multi Thread Speed: 8601

Total Score: 7164

 

[Zardnok]

My daily driver e6420@3.44.

ALU 6413
FPU 7326
MT 13177

Total 10850

 

[Shooks]

Opteron 170 @ 2.9

ALU - 4604
FPU - 5425
Multi- 9189

Total Score - 7656

 

[bob4432]

Originally posted by: StopSign
Interesting thing to note: my E6300 @ 3.2 is scoring higher than the E6400s and E6600s @ 3.2

Is this the advantage of a higher FSB or does the benchmark favor a higher FSB?

although i don't know this benchmark, that is the same reason why the o/c'ed cheaper lower end cpus usually beat the highe priced ones at the higher clock speed - fsb 🙂 that is a pretty general statement but that is why i have summarized over the years