• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nuclear Car

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
shipyard workers have twice the cancer rate of the general population.

workers on nuke subs have 6 times the cancer rate of the general population.

workers who refuel nuke subs have 12 times the cancer rate of the general population.

per the union at the shipyard I worked at in 1978

While I'm not going to say your wrong, I would like a source to back those stats up. I'm not necessarily anti-union; however, it is in the union's best interest to say a particular work site is more dangerous than others when lobbying for increased benefits. Again, I'm not saying you are wrong....only that using an organization with potential conflict of interest as a source can lead to inflated stats.

That said, no one can deny the inherent risk of operating around nuclear materials and there will always be isolated incidents. Technology has also helped to decrease the risk.

Personally, I would have thought that the biggest danger to health on submarines would be sleep deprivation accumulated over the length of a cruise and the emotional strain of vitamin D deficiency which can push individuals over the edge.
 
As someone who has to use solar panels fairly regularly at work I can say they 100% not reliable and the surface area required to get any decent amount of power is huge, thank god were only powering really fancy calculators but anything like a TV would probably take up half of the roof on your house. In Canada atleast.
 
Back
Top