Newell Steamer
Diamond Member
- Jan 27, 2014
- 6,894
- 8
- 0
It's absolutely shameful that obama wanted to support these rebels.
Makes sense.
He wants to use Syria as the training ground, before he sends his brothers into America - duh!
It's absolutely shameful that obama wanted to support these rebels.
Oh and this is just for you:.....
![]()
Muhammad and his 6 year old bride, Aiesha
Why for me? A Catholic Priest pedo pic would apply more to me
Does it apply to posters from Delaware?
If any Muslim posters are reading this, I just want to say America still stands for freedom of religion and people like piss on you are very small group of basement dwellers who would never have the balls to say this stuff publicly. They mostly only exist in the dark corners of the Internet just like their nightmares. Real Americans stand up for freedom, shitty ones hide in the corners and cry about it
Syrian extremists != American Muslims, that's just another straw man you've invented.![]()
If you'll notice, the thing I started on was making the distinction between Muslims and terrorists
If you'll notice, peon does not think there is really a difference
You think his AV is to insult the terrorists that browse ATPN?
I've had that moron on ignore for a long time now, it's just a troll account. The thread is about extremists in Syria, painting people who are against them (not American Muslims) with a broad brush is silly, because other than that one troll no one is talking about the latter.
They're Muslims. They're also terrorists.
They're Muslim terrorists.
I had asked you which Christian faith you followed?
Do you guys gather in a Church or home, or is it just kind of an internet thing?
All are guilty in the eye of God. No one is innocent and we all deserve to go to Hell for sinning.
Humans are sinners. Therefore, we are not to judge others or condemn them because we think they are sinners.
It is wrong for a Christian to hate gays, transgender, atheists, Muslims, etc.
I don't like people because of their evil actions, but I do not hate.
I do not hate anyone because everyone is a sinner and need Jesus Christ for their salvation. I am also a sinner in need of salvation.
Christians are to forgive, no matter how hard it is to forgive.
I study the Bible by myself with the Holy Spirit teaching me.
I could tell that from reading your posts.
Thanks for sharing with me
I recall past societies and states declaring such blatant and equivalent bigotry against Jews. Cleansing of Jews as you wish to be cleansed of Muslims.This is what Islam strives to be. The only reason this doesn't happen here in the US is because the Muslim population density isn't high enough.
You're wrong. Take your time and think about your assumptions. See the mistake?
God gives mercy on whom he wants and those people are compelled to believe in Jesus Christ.
In other words (according to you), people don't initially believe. They don't come to God asking for mercy. No, according to you, God chooses those he wishes to have mercy on, and then FORCES them to believe in him.
Spreading the gospel is not even mentioned in your quote. In fact, if spreading the gospel induced people to believe (as opposed to God FORCING people to believe), then you'd be contradicting yourself.
Now, please explain to us how your beliefs are logical and correct.
Unconditional election is God’s free choice before creation, not based on foreseen faith, to which traitors he will grant faith and repentance, pardoning them, and adopting them into his everlasting family of joy.1. We embrace unconditional election because it is true.
All my objections to unconditional election collapsed when I could no longer explain away Romans 9. The chapter begins with Paul’s readiness to be cursed and cut off from Christ for his unbelieving Jewish kinsmen (verse 3). This implies that some Jews are perishing. And that raises the question of God’s promise to the Jews. Had it failed? Paul answers, “It is not as though the word of God has failed” (verse 6). Why not?
Because “not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel” (verse 6). In other words, God’s purpose was not to acquit every individual person in Israel. It was instead a purpose of election.
So to illustrate the point of God’s unconditional election, Paul uses the analogy of Jacob and Esau: “Though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad — in order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls — [Rebekah] was told, ‘The older will serve the younger’” (verses 11–12).
In other words, God’s original purpose in choosing individuals for himself out of Israel — and all the nations! (Revelation 5:9) — was not based on any conditions that they would meet. It was an unconditional election. And thus he says, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion” (verse 15; see verses 16–18; Romans 11:5–7).
Jesus confirms this teaching: “All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out” (John 6:37). Coming to Jesus is not a condition we meet to qualify for election. It is the result of election. The Father has chosen his sheep. They are his. And he gives them to the Son. That is why they come. “No one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father” (John 6:65). “You did not choose me, but I chose you” (John 15:16; see John 17:2, 6, 9; Galatians 1:15).
In the book of Acts, why did some believe and not others? Luke’s answer is election: “As many as were appointed to eternal life believed” (Acts 13:48). This “appointment” — this election—was not based on foreseen faith; it was the cause of faith.
In Ephesians 1. Paul says, “[God] chose us in [Christ] before the foundation of the world. . . . In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will” (Ephesians 1:4, 11). It is the “counsel of God’s will” that is eternally decisive in this affair.
What will you say to God at the judgment if he asks, “Why did you believe on my Son while others didn’t?” You will not say, “Because I was smarter.” No. Surely you will say, “Because of your grace. Had you not chosen me, I would have been left spiritually dead, unresponsive, guilty.”
2. We embrace unconditional election because God designed it to make us fearless in our proclamation of his grace in a hostile world.
“If God is for us, who can be against us? . . . Who shall bring any charge against God’s elect?” (Romans 8:31, 33).
3. We embrace unconditional election because God designed it to make us humble.
“God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise . . . so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. . . . Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord” (1 Corinthians 1:27, 29, 31).
4. We embrace unconditional election because God made it a powerful moral impetus for compassion, kindness, and forgiveness.
“Put on then, as God’s chosen ones, holy and loved, compassionate hearts, kindness . . . forgiving each other” (Colossians 3:12–13). No one has seen or savored his election truly who is not moved by it to become kind and patient and forgiving.
5. We embrace unconditional election because it is a powerful incentive in our evangelism to help unbelievers, who are great sinners, not despair.
When you offer Christ freely to all unbelievers, suppose one says, “I have sinned too terribly. God could never choose to save me.” The most ultimate despair-destroying thing you can say is this: Do you realize that God chose before the foundation of the world whom he will save? And he did it based on absolutely nothing in you. Before you were born or had done anything good or bad, God chose whether to save you or not.
Therefore, you dare not get in God’s face and tell him what qualifications you lack in order to be chosen. There were no qualifications for being chosen. “What then should I do?” he asks. “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved” (Acts 16:31). That’s how you begin to “confirm your calling and election” (2 Peter 1:10). If you will embrace the Savior, you will confirm that you are elect, and you will be saved
Rarely do I return or even post to this forum due to little of this cesspool changing:
I recall past societies and states declaring such blatant and equivalent bigotry against Jews. Cleansing of Jews as you wish to be cleansed of Muslims.
Such anti-Semitism has long been and correctly declared as forbidden by moderators at AnandTech. Yet at this forum, time and time again, AnandTech stands as an open forum where freedom reigns to post equal bigotry and extremism against all Muslims. A StormFront equivalent this P&N continually demonstrates to be.
A forum avatar to spread vilification and hatred against all Jews in old propaganda images of rats or big nosed thieves? Rightly, a route to banishment. Yet freedom to hate and incite is welcome at AnandTech to present, in every post, the Muslim prophet with a bomb on his head thereby to vilify all Muslims as terrorists, and further to incite with their prophet as a dog. Rats as Jews in the well condemned past -- Muslims as dogs is welcome at AnandTech.
As a Jew, I am well versed and educated in the recognition and presentation of applied bigoted propaganda with the driving goal to vilify, ostracise, and condemn targeted groups. It is clear, with open permission and tolerance to host and spread hatred, Muslims are a welcome target and not welcome at AnandTech.
Rarely do I return or even post to this forum due to little of this cesspool changing:
I recall past societies and states declaring such blatant and equivalent bigotry against Jews. Cleansing of Jews as you wish to be cleansed of Muslims.
Such anti-Semitism has long been and correctly declared as forbidden by moderators at AnandTech. Yet at this forum, time and time again, AnandTech stands as an open forum where freedom reigns to post equal bigotry and extremism against all Muslims. A StormFront equivalent this P&N continually demonstrates to be.
A forum avatar to spread vilification and hatred against all Jews in old propaganda images of rats or big nosed thieves? Rightly, a route to banishment. Yet freedom to hate and incite is welcome at AnandTech to present, in every post, the Muslim prophet with a bomb on his head thereby to vilify all Muslims as terrorists, and further to incite with their prophet as a dog. Rats as Jews in the well condemned past -- Muslims as dogs is welcome at AnandTech.
As a Jew, I am well versed and educated in the recognition and presentation of applied bigoted propaganda with the driving goal to vilify, ostracise, and condemn targeted groups. It is clear, with open permission and tolerance to host and spread hatred, Muslims are a welcome target and not welcome at AnandTech.
You're obviously a Muslim but dont want to tell people that.Lol, are you saying no one used the law to marry 7 year old girls since 1850?
All your jihad watch crap has been debunked over and over, and you will keep posting it no matter what. Right? You believe it as bad as pray to Jesus believes his way is the only way
Get a life
I could be wrong, but I don't recall Jews ever employing suicide, car, or package bombing (specifically to kill large numbers of civilians), or making declarations that they will facilitate genocide against another race. I'm not endorsing the persecution of muslims who strive to live in peace, whether they're Americans or not, but Islamic militant extremists and those who give them aid and comfort, must not be allowed to continue with their agenda. It's a case of kill or be killed, starkly different from events leading up to Jewish persecution in the past, which was simply pure, old-fashioned material jealousy.
The Mohammad hate-speech is wrong, and so is the race and religion baiting, on that I agree.
You're obviously a Muslim but dont want to tell people that.
Beheading was ORDERED by Muhammad. Look up Banu Qurayza - 900 jewish men were beheaded on his orders.
Quran 5:38 orders Muslims to cut off the hands of a thief. Thats the same mindset you see in this video.
Note the following points:
- Two wrongs dont make a right so dont bring in Christianity.
- I'm non-religious so dont talk about what I believe in.
No one said all Muslims are terrorists, but rather MOST terrorists are Muslims nowadays. We're saying that Islam is a violent faith. "Moderate" Muslims are not moderate because they all do nothing against terrorists. In fact they hate the West when it tries to fight terrorism. They are silent partners.
I've given you proof for that in the shape of Quran 5:38 and Banu Qurayza and there is a lot more.
Stop apologizing for Muslims and Islam.
