- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,265
- 126
We've had an opportunity to see all players. Does either side seem fit to lead? Again, a public poll.
Last edited:
We've had an opportunity to see all players. Does either side seem fit to lead? Again, a public poll.
What do you have to offer other than what is before us?
Dumb poll. "None of the above", is not an option.
What do you have to offer other than what is before us?
My answer: Vote Obama/Biden like the future of your country depended on it, because it does.
I know the punchline, now what was the joke?
Issue: Supreme Court nominations
Underlying issue: The likes of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas
My answer: Vote Obama/Biden like the future of your country depended on it, because it does.
You want your country back no body work for 1 week shut this country down for 1 week and bring the powers to be to their knees. Call it a time out for the gooberment for misbehavingI don't know why P Ryan seems to think that all "job creation" and all economic growth is good... GDP may need to go down or stay the same. More people may need to lose their jobs. The govt can't reform itself and expect to create jobs. The worst thing about it all is that P Ryan doesn't seem to have enough faith in abolition of the state to free up the market. He favors bureaucracy as long as he has it the Republican way. He contains no unique ideas just as Mr. Biden contains no unique ideas. This reform/supply side shit was tried before and it didn't work... it doesn't work because it relies on or assumes central planning because the supply side isn't all that matters. We need abolition not fiddling with the tax code. All the flat tax Romney has proposed will do is give the govt the same amount of revenue and it will still require just as much bureaucracy.
All of that said, Obama was the only one of the four who seemed to have any idea of what to do, but he couldn't put it all together.
Just give liberty a chance and stay the hell home the first Tuesday of this coming november.
The question asks if you find either side acceptable. If you do the answer is "YES". If neither meet your standards the answer is "no". That means "none of the above" candidates/parties.
If I were to put "none of the above" then that would mean neither yes nor no, a logical impossibility.
Another one of these threads eh. I encourage all you disgruntled disenfranchised pooh poohers to actually get involved in third parties, and you know.. Do something.
It's easy to sit at a keyboard and talk big about how the system isn't working and blah blah blah, but you realize there are mechanisms to change the system, it just requires lots of people to do so, and most of your types don't actually do anything.
So by all means change the system, but it requires some modicum of effort.
The question asks if you find either side acceptable. If you do the answer is "YES". If neither meet your standards the answer is "no". That means "none of the above" candidates/parties.
If I were to put "none of the above" then that would mean neither yes nor no, a logical impossibility.