- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,877
- 4,209
- 126
We've had an opportunity to see all players. Does either side seem fit to lead? Again, a public poll.
Last edited:
What do you have to offer other than what is before us?We've had an opportunity to see all players. Does either side seem fit to lead? Again, a public poll.
That's a whole ten thread issue, why we have what we do, but the question is about what we have now.What do you have to offer other than what is before us?
The question asks if you find either side acceptable. If you do the answer is "YES". If neither meet your standards the answer is "no". That means "none of the above" candidates/parties.Dumb poll. "None of the above", is not an option.
In Canada we have several parties.What do you have to offer other than what is before us?
I know the punchline, now what was the joke?My answer: Vote Obama/Biden like the future of your country depended on it, because it does.
American politics.I know the punchline, now what was the joke?![]()
I agree vote obummer if you want a welfarte state were none are productive. They fixed the employment numbers . Failed to mention 300,000 retire every month for next 20 years. So the tax increase from the claimed new jobs of the last report doesn't come close to covering 300.000 more SS checks . Facts don't let them get in your wayIssue: Supreme Court nominations
Underlying issue: The likes of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas
My answer: Vote Obama/Biden like the future of your country depended on it, because it does.
You want your country back no body work for 1 week shut this country down for 1 week and bring the powers to be to their knees. Call it a time out for the gooberment for misbehavingI don't know why P Ryan seems to think that all "job creation" and all economic growth is good... GDP may need to go down or stay the same. More people may need to lose their jobs. The govt can't reform itself and expect to create jobs. The worst thing about it all is that P Ryan doesn't seem to have enough faith in abolition of the state to free up the market. He favors bureaucracy as long as he has it the Republican way. He contains no unique ideas just as Mr. Biden contains no unique ideas. This reform/supply side shit was tried before and it didn't work... it doesn't work because it relies on or assumes central planning because the supply side isn't all that matters. We need abolition not fiddling with the tax code. All the flat tax Romney has proposed will do is give the govt the same amount of revenue and it will still require just as much bureaucracy.
All of that said, Obama was the only one of the four who seemed to have any idea of what to do, but he couldn't put it all together.
Just give liberty a chance and stay the hell home the first Tuesday of this coming november.
Why did you go and tell him. I was amusedThe question asks if you find either side acceptable. If you do the answer is "YES". If neither meet your standards the answer is "no". That means "none of the above" candidates/parties.
If I were to put "none of the above" then that would mean neither yes nor no, a logical impossibility.
I did get involved but not because I wanted to I had to bear witness to the actions of the conservative party. This whole system is corrupt beyond human understanding. Hay in dec of 2013 the Federal reserve has to renew the charter. The US wants to renew The BANKS (ROTHSCHILD) refuses as we have nothing to put up. our gold they already have. The hebrew god wants the goldAnother one of these threads eh. I encourage all you disgruntled disenfranchised pooh poohers to actually get involved in third parties, and you know.. Do something.
It's easy to sit at a keyboard and talk big about how the system isn't working and blah blah blah, but you realize there are mechanisms to change the system, it just requires lots of people to do so, and most of your types don't actually do anything.
So by all means change the system, but it requires some modicum of effort.
By "acceptable," do you mean in a relative sense, i.e. as compared to something, or in some absolute threshold sense?The question asks if you find either side acceptable. If you do the answer is "YES". If neither meet your standards the answer is "no". That means "none of the above" candidates/parties.
If I were to put "none of the above" then that would mean neither yes nor no, a logical impossibility.