Originally posted by: datalink7
I realize how nobody is getting a clear picture from the media. I read arguments in P&N and some seem quite silly
Not saying anything about how good or bad the situation is... just that coloring your opinion via what the media is saying isn't leading you to the truth.
-1LT Phillips
Somewhere in Baghdad
I greatly appreciate your service to our country.
Could you clarify your statement? I would certainly like to hear your experience.
Here's what I've heard from colleagues in the media: there are very few reporters left embedded with the military. This is, in part, due to the military denying their embed requests because resources can't be set aside for the reporters' security.
It's also due to the public tiring of Iraq stories. [I'm not talking about support or lack of support for the war, I'm talking about the public persistently craving something new-- the tv show Lost was hot, now it's Heroes, next season it will be something else. Like it or not, the news world is treated increasingly like a form of entertainment. ]
Anyway-- it is, of course, very dangerous to travel in Iraq without some sort of security, so being a non-embedded reporter is virtually impossible. So... the end result is we get the headlines-- car bombs, suicide bombers, etc. The stuff that's reported by Iraqi stringers and the new agencies pick up.
It may very well be going well in certain areas, schools being built, soccer games being played, etc... but reporters can't get through the bad areas to report those stories. Not from some kind of agenda-- as some claim-- but just by circumstances.
Has this been your experience? Have you had any contact with media while there?
I'm genuinely curious about your experience and I hope you remain safe.
Thanks again for your service.