Linux23
Lifer
- Apr 9, 2000
- 11,370
- 741
- 126
Please point out on the doll where the charity touched you
If people don't think that MOST, not all charities, are a business first and a charity second, then I have a bridge to sell.
Please point out on the doll where the charity touched you
32% -- public & professional education. What does that entail? I think this category could be reduced.
32% -- public & professional education. What does that entail? I think this category could be reduced.
Oh by the way, some of the richest people I know work for non profits. Just because the organization is for non profit doesn't mean they pay like crap. Actually, when you think about it, they don't have to compete with other business or meet and $/share figure so higher pay makes sense.
When you consider that the NFL shares the "non-profit" category, you can imagine a rather uneven skew on those numbers.![]()
The NFL as a league doesn't make profit though. Every dollar they, the organization, makes from things like TV deals and such, gets divided equally among the teams (and it becomes the salary cap!). The teams themselves though, make tons of money from merch and such. The NFL isn't "making" billions in profit, as nearly all of that money is going out to the teams to pay their players.
A non-profit isn't just an organization that doesn't make a profit, it's an organization set up under strict regulations governing donations and acceptable use of funding towards stated priorities that have been deemed beneficial to society (hence the reason charitable gifts are often tax-deductible). Don't think of it as "non-profit," think of it as "not for profit," as in the organization is legally prohibited from making a profit or using the funds raised for anything outside of their agreed purpose. If your only definition of non-profit was "they don't make profit," then General Motors spent several years as a non-profit leading up to their bankruptcy. The NFL being established as a non-profit is ludicrous from every angle and impossible to justify unless you think that having a professional football league is a net benefit to society that should have protection from taxation (a league that pays its commissioner $44 million annually mind you).
http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Other-Non-Profits/Business-LeaguesSection 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code provides for the exemption of business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, boards of trade and professional football leagues, which are not organized for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.
The NFL has a special exemption, courtesy of Congress. It's organized as a 501(c)(6):
http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Profits/Other-Non-Profits/Business-Leagues
I'm well aware of how the NFL came to be classified as a non-profit organization. It's ludicrous. It's also not even remotely representative of any other non-profit organization in this country, so it's hardly a good example to bring up if you're discussing anything except the NFL.
The NFL being established as a non-profit is ludicrous from every angle and impossible to justify unless you think that having a professional football league is a net benefit to society that should have protection from taxation (a league that pays its commissioner $44 million annually mind you).
OP are you trolling or just ignorant? The numbers look fine even if they are listed weird.
14% -- fundraising
7% -- administration
27% -- research
32% -- public & professional education
19% -- Patient & community services
14% for fundraising? understandable. they need people to donate.
7% for administration again understandable. they need talented people.
research? duh.
education? again duh
patient and community services? this makes sense too.
32% -- public & professional education. What does that entail? I think this category could be reduced.
TV time aint cheap, and with only .001% of the population as patients to get the word out, we need advertising!
32% -- public & professional education. What does that entail?
I think this category could be reduced.
no we need volunteers in local communities all over the country getting the word out. keyword volunteers.
Those salaries don't seem out of line.
I don't know what this does but I'm sure we don't need it.
You mean like professional athletes and celebrities dumping buckets of ice water on their heads on instagram and youtube to spread awareness and increase our funding by a thousand fold? Already did that, it was the marketing department...
Why would we need professionals to be educated on things like how to properly diagnose and treat ALS? Let's just get a bunch of volunteers to do that!
the dumb flows through your veins huh?