LunarRay
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2003
- 9,993
- 1
- 76
1.) I figured as much. No disrespect intended, but all you know about the Military is what you have read about in History Books. IMO irrelevant.
I think there are some folks in this forum who've 'been there and done that'.
2.) You don't have to level cities and villages to fight a war. But you cannot expect to fight and win a war with the troops having their hands tied behind their backs and having to prove the insurgents were actually armed and shooting at them before they could engage.
One might proceed with the program to 'win', however, the rules of engagement established by Congress or treaty are the rules one ought to follow.
3.) No the weak bladder pussies have only been leading the military in my lifetime since the early 1990's or so.
Do you think that our troops should be court martialed for a prisoner getting a few scrapes and a fat lip?
Yes, I am a retired 20+ veteran.
Once an enemy has been deemed a pow then new rules are in place. If a pow is 'roughed up' that is a violation of our law... just like when a police officer does that to a citizen not resisting arrest on our streets.
Warriors are not often happy with restrictions being in place especially as it relates to the war event itself.. They are there to inflict damage to the enemy consistent with the objective. Some stuff is not permitted, however. War must be tidy and all that. War must have rules and a means to insure innocents are not unduly injured. Collateral damage is always an issue.
We set certain rules to insure we remain on the high side of the equation for some reason.
It makes little sense to me to drop bombs on villages populated by farmers but yet we do it... I makes lots of sense to drop MOABs on the offices of the leaders but we don't often do that. We don't do that especially when it don't suit some agenda and do when it does.
War is nutty!