K1052
Elite Member
- Aug 21, 2003
- 53,779
- 48,465
- 136
Slippery fucking slope.
To a democracy that arguably functions better than ours while insanely more effective safeguarding public health?
Slippery fucking slope.
Funny that you bring this up. My spouse just watched the seminar on this the other day, as she works in a core facility at a university prepping samples for sequencing
ok, so this happened a few weeks ago, but I"m just now posting it-
My wife ordered vitamin D supplements from our local Walmart. When we went to pick up the order, the girl we met at the sidewalk told us that they were out of them, so she had substituted vitamin B supplements, and then asked if that was ok with us...
One vitamin is just as good as any other, amirite?
I thought that was Cleveland?There’s a reason it’s called ‘The Mistake By the Lake’![]()
But are they immune, and if so, how long does it last?This means the mortality rate is dramatically less than previously stated.

I would be truly shocked if we don't see another peak.Well bad news kids, it looks like my hospital is getting another surge. Our COVID unit has been packed last couple days. I think relaxing the stay at home recommendations is going to be a bad idea...
Rule #1 of this relaxing of rules still needs to be that if you are 45+ years old, have a weak immune system, or some other kind of issue then you need to stay home indefinitely. Anyone else should overall maintain distancing practices at all times.Well bad news kids, it looks like my hospital is getting another surge. Our COVID unit has been packed last couple days. I think relaxing the stay at home recommendations is going to be a bad idea...
Ooh dang:
![]()
Coronavirus quickly spread around the world starting late last year, new genetic analysis shows | CNN
The Covid-19 coronavorus has been spreading in people since late last year, a new genetic analysis shows.www.cnn.com
View attachment 20678
This is really interesting. The US didn't report its first Covid death until 2/29.
They just updated it to February 6th:
![]()
1st Known U.S. COVID-19 Death Was Weeks Earlier Than Previously Thought
The first U.S. COVID-19 death took place on Feb. 6, an autopsy shows. The person died at home in Santa Clara County, Calif., at a time when testing in the U.S. was tightly limited.www.npr.org
They're looking as far back as November now:
![]()
Cook County searching for overlooked COVID-19 deaths as far back as November just ‘to cover our bases’
The state recorded its first COVID-19 death on March 16, but the medical examiner is investigating whether the death toll could have actually started months or more earlier.chicago.suntimes.com
It clearly wasn't spreading at the rate it currently is, or we would have had an explosion of ICU cases in DEC/JAN. We've thoroughly established how absurdly virulent this is.If it was honestly spreading across the US as far back as November, containment of ANY kind at this point (outside of vulnerable classes) seems absolutely stupid IMO. No question.
The world didn't start even social distancing (let alone closing places) until Late Feb and Early March (depending on where you live). That's as much as OVER THREE ENTIRE MONTHS of the virus spreading.
If it was honestly spreading across the US as far back as November, containment of ANY kind at this point (outside of vulnerable classes) seems absolutely stupid IMO. No question.
Nationally exposure is probably very low still outside a few hot spots. Even NYC which had rampant spread is still likely under 20%. Absent testing data from earlier you can look at the hospitalization rates and the influenza like illness data and they don't lie, epidemic spread likely commenced in Feb.
Restricting movement, and thus reducing infections, serves to keep the medical system from becoming overburdened which results in the fatality rate skyrocketing. This is supposed to buy time to get the testing regime up to much larger numbers, stand up contact tracing, and identify therapeutics that reduce hospitalization time and ideally lower mortality. Had we not wasted months of time we would have reached this stage already and could hold infections to a manageable level.
Nationally exposure is probably very low still outside a few hot spots. Even NYC which had rampant spread is still likely under 20%. Absent testing data from earlier you can look at the hospitalization rates and the influenza like illness data and they don't lie, epidemic spread likely commenced in Feb.
Restricting movement, and thus reducing infections, serves to keep the medical system from becoming overburdened which results in the fatality rate skyrocketing. This is supposed to buy time to get the testing regime up to much larger numbers, stand up contact tracing, and identify therapeutics that reduce hospitalization time and ideally lower mortality. Had we not wasted months of time we would have reached this stage already and could hold infections to a manageable level.
I totally get that. The problem is that if exposure is truly much larger than we realized from the last 6+ months dating back to November - then this has been drastically overblown as far as how many people are dying from this.
This is the crux of why our media is a piece of shit - even with the data we have thus far, the death rate is roughly ~0.5% based on what we know. Yet our wonderful media still continues to peddle BS that it's 3 or 4% and that everything should be closed and people should die from starvation and not have money to pay bills. Shit man, have you seen the lines of cars that pile up for food banks? It's not going to get any shorter and the free food will only continue to dry up more.
At this point (as what we know continues to grow from increased study/research) I'm willing to bet that death rate will actually turn out to be substantially even lower than 0.5%. If this started spreading in November, then that is pretty much already proven.
To a democracy that arguably functions better than ours while insanely more effective safeguarding public health?
I'm imagining a German version of K1052 in the late 1930's saying "See, these new government regulations aren't so bad! I'm glad that the new administration is looking out for our well-being!"![]()
I totally get that. The problem is that if exposure is truly much larger than we realized from the last 6+ months dating back to November - then this has been drastically overblown as far as how many people are dying from this.
This is the crux of why our media is a piece of shit - even with the data we have thus far, the death rate is roughly ~0.5% based on what we know. Yet our wonderful media still continues to peddle BS that it's 3 or 4% and that everything should be closed and people should die from starvation and not have money to pay bills. Shit man, have you seen the lines of cars that pile up for food banks? It's not going to get any shorter and the free food will only continue to dry up more.
At this point (as what we know continues to grow from increased study/research) I'm willing to bet that death rate will actually turn out to be substantially even lower than 0.5%. If this started spreading in November, then that is pretty much already proven.
So for background
Coronavirus strains cash-strapped hospitals, could cause up to 100 to close within a year
In rural communities across America, more than 800 hospitals faced financial peril before COVID-19. Now, they could face closure.www.usatoday.com
The hospital is not making any money on these minorities without insurance and probably losing money. They aren't making money on elective surgeries anymore. So that's probably why administration is going all idgaf. The hospital will probably be broke when this is all over.
