• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nod vs. Kap

Z

Zap Brannigan

Golden Member
I'm liking the fast scans of Nod from what I've read but Kapersky sounds more robust. I have Norton professional 2004, works well but is a resource hog.

Meditate on this I will....
 
I prefer Kaspersky, but others prefer NOD32. It's really a Coke or Pepsi choice. You can't go wrong with either one, really. Just get rid of NAV. 😀
 
See: http://www.av-comparatives.org/

The "On-demand comparative" indicates Kaspersky is best overall with current signatures. The Aug 2005 "report" (3rd link) has a summary table on page 3 that indiactes how long it takes for AV signatures to ID samples missed in the feb 05 test. This really shows how good Kaspersky is at maintaining their signatures. Nod32 missed around 18000 samples in feb to Kaspersky's miss of around 1500! Nod didn't catch up until August!

The "Retrospective/ProActive Test" indicates Nod32 is best overall at heuristic detection.

If you update your AV daily (who doesn't?), Kaspersky is the best AV overall.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top