mAdD INDIAN
Diamond Member
- Oct 11, 1999
- 7,804
- 1
- 0
<<
<< I personally detest all supercharged cars. In terms of forced induction, turbocharging is much more elegant and efficient. Not to mention less expensive when it breaks! >>
Sorry, but I disagree. For one simple reason: TURBO LAG. Superchargers NEVER lag. How can you call that more elegant and efficient? You like having to rev up the engine to the redline in order to produce any power? I don't....
The GM 3.6 SC engine has been around a while in the form of a Bonneville SSEI. It's a proven engine. Don't worry about it blowing up on you.
I can't BELIEVE people think that the Maxima actually looks BETTER than the GTP! :Q More classy, maybe, but the same people who think this are the people buying your bland and extremely boring Camry. The Maxima looks like every other sedan out there except with incredibly ugly tail lights.
The interior is plasticy, but I like it still.
All doubters really need to DRIVE or at least ride in a GTP before you knock it so harshly. I'm not knocking the Maxima except in the looks department where it has gone downhill in the last few years.
My belief of why people pick the GTP over the Maxima are the simple fact that the GTP is MUCH more sporty in appearance. Appearance counts a LOT for sporty cars. The Maxima just looks like a sedan. I don't doubt the quality/reliability of the Maxima. That's been proven. But if that's what you are absolutely, positively, MOST concerned about, then get a Camry. >>
While I agree with most of what you have said, not all turbo-equipped cars produce lag. Some cars with smaller turbos don't produce as much lag. Also Vortec supercharger kits do produce lag, not as much, but its there.
Yes the GTP looks nice, damn nice! And I love the HUD and the little LCD thing they have in the dash...granted it may not last long (my friend has it in his '93 Grand Prix..the compass feature of it doesn't work anymore).
Each car has their plus and minuses..best way is to drive it.
