shiner
Lifer
- Jul 18, 2000
- 17,112
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Nemesis77
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Threat to the region - War with Iran
A war where you supported Iraq. Ooops!
They are building WMD and are seeking nukes.
So when can we expect US attack on Pakistan and India? How about Israel, they have nukes too? Oh, Israel can have nukes, they are friends of USA, Iraq can't have nukes because US doesn't like Iraq. Double-standards in action.
And about using the gassing of Iranians anf Kurds as an example of Saddams wickedness.... Why didn't you do a thing back when he did committed those atrocities? You knew what was going on, yet you did nothing. Now, about 15 years later you start to whine about those things because it's convenient for you to do so.
Good grief....have you not gotten the point yet that the reason we are going after Iraq is because they are a rogue nation that supports terrorists? Their leader is unstable and has in the past shown his willingness to use those WMD against his own people. Why do you think for a second that he would hesitate to use them against one of his neighbors or give them to a terrorist organization? The difference between Iraq, Pakistan, India, Israel, etc, etc, etc.... is that they are not rogue nations. Yes there are terrorists cells in in Pakistan but the government does not support them. I do think we need to go after those cells with our military and go after cells anywhere in the world they are hiding. This coming attack against Iraq is not because they have WMD. It's because they posses WMD and have used them in the past and will use them again. Israel has had nuclear capability for many, many years and they have never used them against anyone so your trying to compare them to Iraq is silly. Israel uses their nuclear capability as a deterrent much like we and Russia did during the cold war. Would Israel use them? I believe so but only if provoked to do so or as a last resort. Why are we "whining" now about Saddam's use of gas against his own people? As I said in an earlier post it's because back then the American public was not being affected personally by this and would not have supported going after him. Like I said earlier, in order for the American populace as a whole to get behind military action there needs to be what they see as an attack that affects them personally or something along the lines of an invasion by one country against another without merit. Most of the public here is blind to what goes on in the rest of the world and will not get involved unless something happens to wake them up. That something was 9/11 and the American public is now awake and will support military action to weed out terrorists wherever they are?...
gawd, please get this, the terrorists that Saddam support are the Palestinian ones, and in the eyes of most the middle east they are "freedom fighters", did you even read my reply to you earlier?
Freedom fighters my ass.....maybe the Arabs view them as that but the rest of the world, except maybe Iceland, does not. People fighting for freedom don't go around blowing up buses, shopping malls, etc.. unless they are Arab or maybe Irish(I can say that since I'm Irish) Let me tell you this one more time.....a terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist. I don't care if they are Arab, Irish, Icelandic, French, American, etc... they are terrorists and must be eliminated.
