No Health Care Vote Before August Break

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Way to go fellas. I know some people who aren't getting my vote in 2010 unless they get their shit together.

This country is going downhill everyday because of the nuts that have kept us from joining the ranks of advanced nations with UHC.

Uuhh? Canada is more advance than US? UK too? So why are these people going to US for special treatment? When was the last time you heard a US citizen going to Canada for advance treatment? Or going to UK for the same thing? How about pulling your head out of your arse and then maybe you'll start seeing things normal again? Remember the $787B stimulus? Well. . .
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

I agree regarding the need for reform. I think any halfway logical person realizes that the system is broken and needs fixed, but passing some massive bill without really thinking through all the options and considerations seems rather stupid.

I keep seeing people post things about the repubs having no alternative. Whether they offer an alternative or not has no bearing on whether the proposed plan is good or not. I don't care if they don't have an alternative, if the proposed plan is not better than what we have today then we shouldn't do it. Lets take some time, come up with the smart solution, and then if the republicans want to block it to maintain a status quo, the screw'em.

You are absolutely correct1 The reason the GOP is not offering any alternative is because they know this UHC is a "waterloo" for the Obowman and they don't want to do anything with it. Remember the $787B stiimulus? Well, GOP did try putting an alternative but of course they were ignored. Well, guess what the $787B did? More than 9.1M unemployed and rising.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Engineer
I guess that depends on how often you go to the doctor. My last two co-pay visits cost me $25 each but totaled $425 and that was for 20 minutes work-total.

I am going to assume your insurance was billed $425, while you paid a $25 copay. I will also assume you insurance paid nowhere near $425. Kinda like when my insurance was billed $50 for a 9 volt battery for a medical device that prescribed to my wife. I know insurance did not pay that amount.

[/quote]
Again, the HSA is not a solution to anything except to eventually shift the burden of insurance from the company to the employee. It does not even begin to solve the costs issue of care. It doesn't reduce paperwork unless you have no other insurance and then, you get billed full out of network rates. Finally, it does little to nothing for that that can't afford insurance of any type even while working. Why would they suddenly be able to fund an HSA if they are not making enough to buy regular insurance?[/quote]

HSAs do two main things.
1. High deductable plans are inexpensive, so you are much less likely to lose coverage with a job change. According the cbo about 1/2 of those without insurance is because of a job change. This can be a significant step in keeping people insured.

2. They makes consumers responsible for what they are buying. IF you only paying a copay, it does not matter how or where you get your service. As an example the ceo of safeway stated that they found that colonoscopy cost somewhere between $700 and $7000 depending on where it was done. Before their employees did not care where they got this procedure done, it cost the same. Now that their employees are responsible for their medical spending they are far more careful about their spending. Safeway has kept healthcare costs flat for the last several years. They also partially fund the employees hsa as well. They also have other incentives to help their employees live healthier.


 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Engineer
I guess that depends on how often you go to the doctor. My last two co-pay visits cost me $25 each but totaled $425 and that was for 20 minutes work-total.

I am going to assume your insurance was billed $425, while you paid a $25 copay. I will also assume you insurance paid nowhere near $425. Kinda like when my insurance was billed $50 for a 9 volt battery for a medical device that prescribed to my wife. I know insurance did not pay that amount.

and If I have only an HSA account with no insurance, how do I get the discount that insurance companies receive? Even better, since the doctor's office doesn't have to deal with insurance, why not give me a bigger discount? You will be charged full insurance rates for the services and will not get a discount.

Of course, that goes to the real problem...and that's the cost of services. Why $425 for 20 minutes worth of work? I looked and the insurance paid out $225 of the $425 + my $50 so it as $275 actual payment for 20 minutes worth of work. HSA's are not going to solve that, period. Neither will giving everyone insurance. There is something fundamentally wrong when it costs that much for service and when 16% of GDP of the richest country on earth is spent each year on health care.

We can just agree to disagree at this point. HSA's will not do anything except force the employee to become self insured over time IMO.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Isn't it funny how all the anti uhc pretend to hide around the "don't rush it" mantra, which so happens to be the way to stall and kill legislation. You people aren't clever and you are very much for the status quo, despite your posturing. You are as obvious as can be.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Good maybe over the recess they can come up with a bill that you know actually cuts costs like Obama promised. All the current bils are terrible and will make things worse. All they do is soak small business and the rich to expand coverage. I also hope the strip out any sort of public option. The government has already screwed up everything else it has touch. Soon as they fix the budget,schools, SS and medicare they can have a shot at my healthcare.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: Jiggz
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Way to go fellas. I know some people who aren't getting my vote in 2010 unless they get their shit together.

This country is going downhill everyday because of the nuts that have kept us from joining the ranks of advanced nations with UHC.

Uuhh? Canada is more advance than US? UK too? So why are these people going to US for special treatment? When was the last time you heard a US citizen going to Canada for advance treatment? Or going to UK for the same thing? How about pulling your head out of your arse and then maybe you'll start seeing things normal again? Remember the $787B stimulus? Well. . .

The choices of the worlds richest should be the exception not the rule.

Yes, we are becoming a monstrously socially backwards nation.

War on Drugs?
No Health Care for 20% of our citizens?
Repressive views on sex?


 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
now they are talking about voteing on it anyway without fallowing the house rules. interesting.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Sounds like they are getting hammered by their constituents. Good.

Yeah. I just emailed my Senators (both Democrats) and the DNC and told them to expect my family to stay home and not donate to any campaigns if they can't be bothered to pass a public option. If they can't get it done, fuck them.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: SammyJr
Originally posted by: spidey07
Sounds like they are getting hammered by their constituents. Good.

Yeah. I just emailed my Senators (both Democrats) and the DNC and told them to expect my family to stay home and not donate to any campaigns if they can't be bothered to pass a public option. If they can't get it done, fuck them.

If they don't get this done I will do everything I can to tank their asses next round of elections.

Get it done or you can get out of my face, so called "representatives".
 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.

pffft hah! right.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Engineer
-snip-
Please explain how I'm putting my money into an account and having to purchase the catastrophic insurance yet it is not a "self insured" plan?

Sure, "some" are somewhat of an insurance plan but you are footing the bulk of your own bills. Insurance is a pooling of money so that coverage risk is spread among the group. HSA = Risk here is spread to you and you alone. Not insurance. Better than nothing I guess but not insurance.

Some confusion here about the term "self insured". Self-insured doesn't mean that you pay for your own insurance policy. It means you don't have an insurance policy, instead you set money aside in your own account to pay for any other-wise insurable contigency that might happen.

link

Insurance of oneself or one's possessions against possible loss by regularly setting aside funds.

Fern
 

themusgrat

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2005
1,408
0
0
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: spidey07

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.

pffft hah! right.

Actually.... he's right, those are the big things Republicans are wanting out of this. They know they can't stop the bill, so that's all they can offer their constituents.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Way to go fellas. I know some people who aren't getting my vote in 2010 unless they get their shit together.

This country is going downhill everyday because of the nuts that have kept us from joining the ranks of advanced nations with UHC.

So even if it's a piece of shit, as long as it's labeled UHC, it better get passed or else...

That's the line of thinking that fucks this country over. From both sides. Thank God for the moderates.
 
Oct 16, 1999
10,490
4
0
Originally posted by: themusgrat
Originally posted by: eits
Originally posted by: spidey07

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.

pffft hah! right.

Actually.... he's right, those are the big things Republicans are wanting out of this. They know they can't stop the bill, so that's all they can offer their constituents.

Obama has said flat out he wouldn't sign a bill that added to the deficit, i.e. defecit neutral. Republicans are just pushing posturing and obstruction.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Engineer
-snip-
Please explain how I'm putting my money into an account and having to purchase the catastrophic insurance yet it is not a "self insured" plan?

Sure, "some" are somewhat of an insurance plan but you are footing the bulk of your own bills. Insurance is a pooling of money so that coverage risk is spread among the group. HSA = Risk here is spread to you and you alone. Not insurance. Better than nothing I guess but not insurance.

Some confusion here about the term "self insured". Self-insured doesn't mean that you pay for your own insurance policy. It means you don't have an insurance policy, instead you set money aside in your own account to pay for any other-wise insurable contigency that might happen.

link

Insurance of oneself or one's possessions against possible loss by regularly setting aside funds.

Fern

i.e. HSA. Putting your own money in to pay your own bills. Not everyone with an HSA will have catastrophic insurance nor is it always "free" with an employer HSA. Not to mention (as I've stated), not all employers contribute to an HSA. But I've beat this horse into the ground and am going to spend the last of my forced 25 days off enjoying them (instead of arguing about stupid shit that I have no control over anyway)! :D
 

Xellos2099

Platinum Member
Mar 8, 2005
2,277
13
81
The problem is, it is next to impossible to have a government health care and NOT add to deficit unless they want to add 90% tax rate for those who made 1million plus and even that is not enough.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
That's bad news for America's uninsured. Congress gotta keep working until they get this done.
 

NaughtyGeek

Golden Member
May 3, 2005
1,065
0
71
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
The progrma is, it is next to impossible to have a government health care and NOT add to deficit unless they want to add 90% tax rate for those who made 1million plus and even that is not enough.

And yet one of the biggest arguments made by those wishing to push this through is that we're already paying for it. So, I say again, if we're already paying for it why do we have to find a way to fund it?
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: Jiggz
Originally posted by: Double Trouble
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

I agree regarding the need for reform. I think any halfway logical person realizes that the system is broken and needs fixed, but passing some massive bill without really thinking through all the options and considerations seems rather stupid.

I keep seeing people post things about the repubs having no alternative. Whether they offer an alternative or not has no bearing on whether the proposed plan is good or not. I don't care if they don't have an alternative, if the proposed plan is not better than what we have today then we shouldn't do it. Lets take some time, come up with the smart solution, and then if the republicans want to block it to maintain a status quo, the screw'em.

You are absolutely correct1 The reason the GOP is not offering any alternative is because they know this UHC is a "waterloo" for the Obowman and they don't want to do anything with it. Remember the $787B stiimulus? Well, GOP did try putting an alternative but of course they were ignored. Well, guess what the $787B did? More than 9.1M unemployed and rising.

The stimulus hasn't been completely spent yet, not even close. You guys really believe your own Messiah bullshit. Obama can't work miracles and any economic recovery is going to take time. I see a lot of guys working on projects funded by the Stimulus around here and I know they're doing better for it.

The Republican's plan was tax cuts for the wealthy as usual. Yeah, they created this magical 10% tier for people making under $100,000 but anyone who pays attention knows that families making under $100,000 hardly pay Federal taxes anyway due to deductions and credits and that health insurance/care is the real burden on the Middle Class.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Isn't it funny how all the anti uhc pretend to hide around the "don't rush it" mantra, which so happens to be the way to stall and kill legislation. You people aren't clever and you are very much for the status quo, despite your posturing. You are as obvious as can be.

It is also obvious people like you want something, ANYTHING, passed for the sake of passing something, not because it is really a good idea.