No Health Care Vote Before August Break

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.
 

Kirby

Lifer
Apr 10, 2006
12,028
2
0
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The wingnut republicans offer lots of things, mainly lulz.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Way to go fellas. I know some people who aren't getting my vote in 2010 unless they get their shit together.

This country is going downhill everyday because of the nuts that have kept us from joining the ranks of advanced nations with UHC.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.

Not saying that what the dems are pushing is reasonable, but the GOP isn't pushing anything to save anything. The only horseshit that they have ever given is HSA's and the ability for you to "self insure". It's a ploy to eventually remove the people from employer insurance and become self insured.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.

Not saying that what the dems are pushing is reasonable, but the GOP isn't pushing anything to save anything. The only horseshit that they have ever given is HSA's and the ability for you to "self insure". It's a ploy to eventually remove the people from employer insurance and become self insured and eventually lose health coverage all together.

Fixed it!
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: Engineer


Not saying that what the dems are pushing is reasonable, but the GOP isn't pushing anything to save anything. The only horseshit that they have ever given is HSA's and the ability for you to "self insure". It's a ploy to eventually remove the people from employer insurance and become self insured.

You should try listening to your Senate minority leader more often to see what he's doing/pushing.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

I agree regarding the need for reform. I think any halfway logical person realizes that the system is broken and needs fixed, but passing some massive bill without really thinking through all the options and considerations seems rather stupid.

I keep seeing people post things about the repubs having no alternative. Whether they offer an alternative or not has no bearing on whether the proposed plan is good or not. I don't care if they don't have an alternative, if the proposed plan is not better than what we have today then we shouldn't do it. Lets take some time, come up with the smart solution, and then if the republicans want to block it to maintain a status quo, the screw'em.
 

lupi

Lifer
Apr 8, 2001
32,539
260
126
Best thing about this so far has been the administration releasing a statement shortly after this announcement that they were going ahead with their plan and hope to see a vote before the break only to have just a wee bit of change when bho spoke at cleveland because now a delay is ok. :)
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,546
1,125
126
Originally posted by: loki8481
damn GOP obstructionists...

Maybe my sarcasm meter is broken. But Healthcare "reform" is currently being held up by Blue Dog Democrats in the House.
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,546
1,125
126
Originally posted by: jpeyton
If it happens in the fall, so be it.

Regardless, passing major reform like this in his first year in the White House will be monumental for Obama. He has the necessary Congressional seats to do it until at least late 2010, so a few months delay won't matter in the long run.

The Democratic party currently has three competing factions. The Blue Dogs, the moderate to conservative democrats which are the main reason the Dems have a majority right now are the ones wanting substaintial changes to current proposals. Pelosi said she has the votes. The Blue Dogs quickly responded publicly saying she does not.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.
No it's the truth, the Wingnuts have really nothing to offer but the status quo.
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.
No it's the truth, the Wingnuts have really nothing to offer but the status quo.

Yep. If they did, they would have offered it in the 12 years when they ran Congress.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
Let me understand...
"these" republicans in congress are against UHC, while they enjoy their own UHC...
Yeah... Right...
They killed UHC...Those Bastards!!!
 

BarrySotero

Banned
Apr 30, 2009
509
0
0
I wrote a couple dozen letters - not one to a GOPer. It was sensible Dems that caused delay on early vote. That bill was intentionally left vague with lots of "to be decided after passage" clauses. It was a Freddie Kruger bill and Dems new it would haunt them.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.

Not saying that what the dems are pushing is reasonable, but the GOP isn't pushing anything to save anything. The only horseshit that they have ever given is HSA's and the ability for you to "self insure". It's a ploy to eventually remove the people from employer insurance and become self insured.

Employer provided insurance is one of the problems as it is not portable. Change jobs, lose your insurance, which accounts for about 1/2 of the uninsured. You may not like HSAs, but they are providing insurance to about 4million(around 50% hsas did not have prior insurance) people that did not have insurance before. This cost the taxpayers next to nothing to implement.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.

Not saying that what the dems are pushing is reasonable, but the GOP isn't pushing anything to save anything. The only horseshit that they have ever given is HSA's and the ability for you to "self insure". It's a ploy to eventually remove the people from employer insurance and become self insured.

Employer provided insurance is one of the problems as it is not portable. Change jobs, lose your insurance, which accounts for about 1/2 of the uninsured. You may not like HSAs, but they are providing insurance to about 4million(around 50% hsas did not have prior insurance) people that did not have insurance before. This cost the taxpayers next to nothing to implement.

HSA = self insured, period.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,669
266
126
Originally posted by: sportage
Let me understand...
"these" republicans in congress are against UHC, while they enjoy their own UHC...
Yeah... Right...
They killed UHC...Those Bastards!!!

What part of 'the republicans are the minority' are you incapable of understanding. The dems can pass this without 1 republican vote.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,669
266
126
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Budmantom
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I'm for HC Reform but I feel that it needs more work, hopefully they can comprimise and find a way to appeal to the Moderates. As for the Wingnut Republicans, fuck them, it seems they have nothing to offer.

For a second I thought you sounded reasonable....

What was unreasonable about what he posted?

The republicans are the ones pushing for sensible reform with two main goals being deficit neutral and not government control of patient care or decisions.

So red's last sentence is bogus and unreasonable.

Not saying that what the dems are pushing is reasonable, but the GOP isn't pushing anything to save anything. The only horseshit that they have ever given is HSA's and the ability for you to "self insure". It's a ploy to eventually remove the people from employer insurance and become self insured.

Employer provided insurance is one of the problems as it is not portable. Change jobs, lose your insurance, which accounts for about 1/2 of the uninsured. You may not like HSAs, but they are providing insurance to about 4million(around 50% hsas did not have prior insurance) people that did not have insurance before. This cost the taxpayers next to nothing to implement.

HSA = self insured, period.

Not so. My old company had a health care option that covered major medical items AND allowed you to contribute to an HSA.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: FerrelGeek

Not so. My old company had a health care option that covered major medical items AND allowed you to contribute to an HSA.

and my company has an HSA that you have to pay for the catastrophic insurance and get zero match in the HSA. That's as close to self insured as you're going to get. Just because your company does one thing does not mean that they all do (same goes for mine, but I bet mine is not the only company that does this). To think that an HSA = insurance is crazy. It's nothing but a tax advantaged self pay plan.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Engineer
HSA = self insured, period.

No that is not the case. If you self employed it is very good option. However much of the hsa growth has come companies that have never offered insurance now offering HSA plans to their employees.

And if you company is not covering premiums or putting money into your HSA, you should be shopping around for a better deal.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Engineer
HSA = self insured, period.

No that is not the case. If you self employed it is very good option. However much of the hsa growth has come companies that have never offered insurance now offering HSA plans to their employees.

And if you company is not covering premiums or putting money into your HSA, you should be shopping around for a better deal.

Please explain how I'm putting my money into an account and having to purchase the catastrophic insurance yet it is not a "self insured" plan?

Sure, "some" are somewhat of an insurance plan but you are footing the bulk of your own bills. Insurance is a pooling of money so that coverage risk is spread among the group. HSA = Risk here is spread to you and you alone. Not insurance. Better than nothing I guess but not insurance.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Engineer
HSA = self insured, period.

No that is not the case. If you self employed it is very good option. However much of the hsa growth has come companies that have never offered insurance now offering HSA plans to their employees.

And if you company is not covering premiums or putting money into your HSA, you should be shopping around for a better deal.

Please explain how I'm putting my money into an account and having to purchase the catastrophic insurance yet it is not a "self insured" plan?

Yes you can self insure with an HSA, but that does mean all HSA are self insured.


Sure, "some" are somewhat of an insurance plan but you are footing the bulk of your own bills. Insurance is a pooling of money so that coverage risk is spread among the group. HSA = Risk here is spread to you and you alone. Not insurance. Better than nothing I guess but not insurance.
[/quote]

The high deductible insurance that is paired with HSA is insurance and it is pooled, except it is pooling for the catastrophic, not the common affordable problems. It if foolish to pay hundreds every month in premiums so you have the luxury of a $20 copay at the docs office.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Engineer
HSA = self insured, period.

No that is not the case. If you self employed it is very good option. However much of the hsa growth has come companies that have never offered insurance now offering HSA plans to their employees.

And if you company is not covering premiums or putting money into your HSA, you should be shopping around for a better deal.

Please explain how I'm putting my money into an account and having to purchase the catastrophic insurance yet it is not a "self insured" plan?

Yes you can self insure with an HSA, but that does mean all HSA are self insured.


Sure, "some" are somewhat of an insurance plan but you are footing the bulk of your own bills. Insurance is a pooling of money so that coverage risk is spread among the group. HSA = Risk here is spread to you and you alone. Not insurance. Better than nothing I guess but not insurance.


The high deductible insurance that is paired with HSA is insurance and it is pooled, except it is pooling for the catastrophic, not the common affordable problems. It if foolish to pay hundreds every month in premiums so you have the luxury of a $20 copay at the docs office.

I guess that depends on how often you go to the doctor. My last two co-pay visits cost me $25 each but totaled $425 and that was for 20 minutes work-total.

Again, the HSA is not a solution to anything except to eventually shift the burden of insurance from the company to the employee. It does not even begin to solve the costs issue of care. It doesn't reduce paperwork unless you have no other insurance and then, you get billed full out of network rates. Finally, it does little to nothing for that that can't afford insurance of any type even while working. Why would they suddenly be able to fund an HSA if they are not making enough to buy regular insurance?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: spidey07
Sounds like they are getting hammered by their constituents. Good.

/taps sarcasm meter...

WTF? :confused: