No benchmark gains after upgrading gpu

paolopira

Junior Member
Jan 27, 2016
18
0
0
Hello everybody.
My rig is made of an Intel i5 4690k, asus z97 WiFi pro, 8Gb ram, gtx 980 ti, corsair 650w and 250Gb ssd hard drive on Windows 10 using an acer 27" 1080p monitor.
I recently upgraded from a gtx 970 but I didn't see any improvements on benchmark scores using firestrike. The final score is on the low 4k, with decent fps for graphics tests but very low fps on physics and combined.

I'm very frustrated because I was expecting much better results with the upgrade.

Please help
 

xorbe

Senior member
Sep 7, 2011
368
0
76
What about the games that you actually play, did the fps go up? Set cpu max/min to 100% in power control panel using high performance setting.
 

n0x1ous

Platinum Member
Sep 9, 2010
2,574
252
126
you sure you used the same firestrike test on both gpus?....4,000 score sounds about right for a stock clocked 980ti on FS Ultra. There is no way you would get that score with a 970 on firestrike ultra. Perhaps you are confusing firestrike extreme (1440P) vs firestrike ultra (4k)?
 

paolopira

Junior Member
Jan 27, 2016
18
0
0
What about the games that you actually play, did the fps go up? Set cpu max/min to 100% in power control panel using high performance setting.

Didn't try the games because I was too mad. I'll try tonight.
 

paolopira

Junior Member
Jan 27, 2016
18
0
0
you sure you used the same firestrike test on both gpus?....4,000 score sounds about right for a stock clocked 980ti on FS Ultra. There is no way you would get that score with a 970 on firestrike ultra. Perhaps you are confusing firestrike extreme (1440P) vs firestrike ultra (4k)?

It was the regular firestrike (neither ultra nor extreme). ~4200 for both gtx970 and 980 ti
 

VirtualLarry

No Lifer
Aug 25, 2001
56,571
10,207
126
Did you get the 980ti from Ebay, or from Amazon.com from a third-party seller? Could be a 970 with a hacked BIOS.
 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,630
25
91
" with decent fps for graphics tests but very low fps on physics and combined."

your scores are exactly what they should be. Physics is almost 100% dependent on your cpu, and since your cpu is (4690k) still same, your physics score will be same. Combined is like "average" of physics + graphics score.
 

Hail The Brain Slug

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2005
3,784
3,101
146
this is the link for the FS test
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/10496289?

It looks like your CPU score is WAY too low. I would guess it should be somewhere from 5000-8000 depending on if you're at stock settings or overclocked. The GPU Score for the 980Ti is a bit low, but since the CPU score is so much lower than it should be I would guess the CPU underperforming is holding back the 980Ti.
 

paolopira

Junior Member
Jan 27, 2016
18
0
0
" with decent fps for graphics tests but very low fps on physics and combined."

your scores are exactly what they should be. Physics is almost 100% dependent on your cpu, and since your cpu is (4690k) still same, your physics score will be same. Combined is like "average" of physics + graphics score.

so what you're saying is that my cpu is a bottleneck.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6839553

Compare physics score and turbo core clock and ram speed.

That CPU is overclocked, but your Turbo core speed should be 3,900 and not 800.

Your Physics score seems to reflect a very low CPU clock?
 
Last edited: