• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Nintendo Revolution... WOW...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

speg

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2000
3,681
3
76
www.speg.com
The wheel seems a bit overkill... why not just turn the controller on it's side and use it like that as a steering wheel.
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: speg
Originally posted by: Dissipate
Wow, you saw an advertisement for a hyped product.

This thing doesn't look very 'revolutionary' to me. Sure, for some games it could be fun to use it, but overall I don't see it revolutionizing video games.


Going from a stick to free movement.

How can you not call that a revolution?


He may be a Playstation fanboy, in which case he'll have long since forgotten what the word "Innovation" means :)

Jason
 

Modeps

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
17,254
44
91
The biggest problem I have is that the video they're showing there has nothing to do with actual functionality... it's a 100% concept video. Now, will this controller actually be able to track with accuracy wild movements like the ones shown? I have serious doubts about that.

One thing that is intriguing me though, is that there is a rumor floating around that the system will be $99 at launch. that's a good rumor and for $99, I'll buy it even if I dont play it much.

Finally, yes, nintendo's back catalog will be available but it will not be free.
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
Originally posted by: Modeps
The biggest problem I have is that the video they're showing there has nothing to do with actual functionality... it's a 100% concept video. Now, will this controller actually be able to track with accuracy wild movements like the ones shown? I have serious doubts about that.

It's not even a concept video. It's just a bunch of actors non-sensically waving controllers around. Until Nintendo starts to show games and how they work with the controller....I call bullshot.

One thing that is intriguing me though, is that there is a rumor floating around that the system will be $99 at launch. that's a good rumor and for $99, I'll buy it even if I dont play it much
.
Nintendo is saying Spring 2006 launch for Japan and Fall 2006 launch for North America. I'd be pleasantly surprised to see it at $99. I don't think it'll happen though.
 

speg

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2000
3,681
3
76
www.speg.com
They have shown demo's to the media. No actual games yet, just little pieces of software to demo specific uses that it can be used for. And so far, they've been very postitive reports.
 

Jzero

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
18,834
1
0
Originally posted by: Modeps
Now, will this controller actually be able to track with accuracy wild movements like the ones shown? I have serious doubts about that.

This isn't exactly new tech. I've used mice with similar gyroscopic motion tracking and they seem to work pretty well. I even used one to play Quake2 once. Aiming was pretty easy, but of course it wasn't so good for turning around. The real drawback was that it was TIRING.
 

Modeps

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
17,254
44
91
Jzero: it's not based on gyros though. According to 1up, it's based on similar technology that they started with the powerglove... sensors that you have to setup on your TV to determine the orientation of the device to the television...

at least that sounds like it has nothing to do with gyroscopes.
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: Modeps
Jzero: it's not based on gyros though. According to 1up, it's based on similar technology that they started with the powerglove... sensors that you have to setup on your TV to determine the orientation of the device to the television...

at least that sounds like it has nothing to do with gyroscopes.

If not gyroscopes I don't know what it could be. According to the various reports, you can tilt it up/down/left/right/backward/forward and it is aware of those movements. What else could do that besides a gyroscope?

Also, it's been close to 20 years since the Power Glove, and I think we all know how much technology can advance in such a space of time. More importantly though, PG was an *accessory*, which pretty much doomed it to no support. This is the *standard* controller, which pretty much *guarantees* support, at least from Nintendo and its' closest 2nd party publishers. If they can get enough 3rd parties aboard they might just have *the* hot console of the next generation on their hands.

Jason
 

aswedc

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2000
3,543
0
76
Nintendo has yet to show any sign they are planning to appeal to adult gamers again. There are what, like 4 titles on the Gamecube that aren't for kids or on every other system too? Also, they will not support HDTV. Microsoft has Xbox Live and 720p on everything. The PS3 doubles as a Blu-ray player.

Lack of games, inferior technology.

The controller may be good, or it may not. That is irrelevant. If its good, Microsoft and Sony will copy it immediately. It's not like the technology behind it is particularily revolutionary.

And Nintendo will lose, again.
 

Jzero

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
18,834
1
0
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: Modeps
Jzero: it's not based on gyros though. According to 1up, it's based on similar technology that they started with the powerglove... sensors that you have to setup on your TV to determine the orientation of the device to the television...

at least that sounds like it has nothing to do with gyroscopes.

If not gyroscopes I don't know what it could be. According to the various reports, you can tilt it up/down/left/right/backward/forward and it is aware of those movements. What else could do that besides a gyroscope?

Here's the text from the 1-up article that Modeps refers to:
"Two small sensors placed near the TV and a chip inside the controller track its position and orientation, allowing the player to manipulate the action on screen by physically moving the controller itself."

Seems like a backwards way to do it. Nonetheless, based on my experiences with Samba De Amigo, Mocap Boxing and Police 911 even this motion sensor technology has become quite effective.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,643
6,527
126
Originally posted by: aswedc
Nintendo has yet to show any sign they are planning to appeal to adult gamers again. There are what, like 4 titles on the Gamecube that aren't for kids or on every other system too? Also, they will not support HDTV. Microsoft has Xbox Live and 720p on everything. The PS3 doubles as a Blu-ray player.

Lack of games, inferior technology.

The controller may be good, or it may not. That is irrelevant. If its good, Microsoft and Sony will copy it immediately. It's not like the technology behind it is particularily revolutionary.

And Nintendo will lose, again.

apparently you have no clue what market Nintendo is going for.

they themselves even admitted that they aren't going to go up against MS or Sony this time around. they are for a completely different audience than MS and Sony.

they are keeping their system very simple minded. i can guarantee you that the (promised by nintendo) $200 or less price tag will make the Revolution go into many MANY more homes than the PS3 come xmas time.
 

Jzero

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
18,834
1
0
Originally posted by: purbeast0
they are keeping their system very simple minded. i can guarantee you that the (promised by nintendo) $200 or less price tag will make the Revolution go into many MANY more homes than the PS3 come xmas time.

Personally, I'm tired of overcomplicated 30-button controllers. I the apparent return to simplicity, coupled with the price tag, is very appealing to me.
 

AbsolutDealage

Platinum Member
Dec 20, 2002
2,675
0
0
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
This reminds me of that power glove commercial where the kid was playing Punch-out.

I'm skeptical, but curious.

Ugh... I hope it's better than the powerglove. I got it one year for christmas, and not once did I get it to work properly. What a POS.
 

aswedc

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2000
3,543
0
76
they are keeping their system very simple minded. i can guarantee you that the (promised by nintendo) $200 or less price tag will make the Revolution go into many MANY more homes than the PS3 come xmas time.
Well, I sure hope that works out for them, because it didn't this generation.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,643
6,527
126
Originally posted by: Jzero
Originally posted by: purbeast0
they are keeping their system very simple minded. i can guarantee you that the (promised by nintendo) $200 or less price tag will make the Revolution go into many MANY more homes than the PS3 come xmas time.

Personally, I'm tired of overcomplicated 30-button controllers. I the apparent return to simplicity, coupled with the price tag, is very appealing to me.

i honestly will admit that i was a nintendo hater after i went through 2 gamecubes and was disappointed both times (bought one on launch, sold it ... bought another one when Mario Sunshine came out and sold it a while after playing through zelda), and that i was going to just straight up laugh at the revolution because I again knew i would be disappointed.

i can now honestly say that I'm looking forward more to the revolution than I am the PS3. nintendo's new direction w/the simplicity and price appeals to me. it looks like the revolution will be something my girlfriend will sit down and like to play with me as well, and she hates games.

and for the record, i have owned a ps2 since the release date, so i'm not a sony hater or anything as well.
 

mAdMaLuDaWg

Platinum Member
Feb 15, 2003
2,437
1
0
Originally posted by: Modeps
The biggest problem I have is that the video they're showing there has nothing to do with actual functionality... it's a 100% concept video. Now, will this controller actually be able to track with accuracy wild movements like the ones shown? I have serious doubts about that.

One thing that is intriguing me though, is that there is a rumor floating around that the system will be $99 at launch. that's a good rumor and for $99, I'll buy it even if I dont play it much.

Finally, yes, nintendo's back catalog will be available but it will not be free.

A few journalists were lucky enough to play Metroid Prime 2 with this controller and were amazed at its accuracy... finally, FPSs will become much more easier to play on consoles!
 

Modeps

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
17,254
44
91
Madmalblipblapdawgguy: There is a huge difference between an FPS and what they were showing in that video. People were swinging the controller like a sword or a baseball bat... they wern't pointing and clicking. This could very well be the #1 FPS device for consoles, but I just dont see how the rest of that stuff is going to work in the way they're displaying it.
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: aswedc
Nintendo has yet to show any sign they are planning to appeal to adult gamers again. There are what, like 4 titles on the Gamecube that aren't for kids or on every other system too? Also, they will not support HDTV. Microsoft has Xbox Live and 720p on everything. The PS3 doubles as a Blu-ray player.

Lack of games, inferior technology.

The controller may be good, or it may not. That is irrelevant. If its good, Microsoft and Sony will copy it immediately. It's not like the technology behind it is particularily revolutionary.

And Nintendo will lose, again.

Oh come off it. Sony and Microsoft, while introducing interesting new machines, are just doing the same damn thing that's been done for the last 10 years in gaming. This is something DIFFERENT, and I for one welcome something innovative to the market. It's clear that neither Sony nor Microsoft want to do anything innovative this time around, and say what you will about their HDTV support, but the *fact* is that while they're targeting maybe 10-15% of the market (HDTV's have yet to catch on for the mainstream consumer) Nintendo is targeting 100% of the market. It's entirely possible that the whole HDTV-centric advertising of both MS and Sony could blow up in their faces. With regard to specs, Rev's aren't even *released* yet, so you have no IDEA what they're going to be. And as any REAL gamer will tell you, it takes more than specs to make great games.

And please, don't be idiotic. If the Rev controller takes off, MS and Sony *can't* copy it immediately because they've already cast their lot with a standard controller that's only marginally different from current controllers. For developer support to catch on the controller has to be the *standard* controller for the system.

There is PLENTY of room in this market for 3 players, and in the end I expect to own all three systems. That said, the one I'm *most* anticipating right now is Revolution, because for the first time in a *decade* someone's offering something DIFFERENT.

Jason
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,643
6,527
126
Originally posted by: Modeps
Madmalblipblapdawgguy: There is a huge difference between an FPS and what they were showing in that video. People were swinging the controller like a sword or a baseball bat... they wern't pointing and clicking. This could very well be the #1 FPS device for consoles, but I just dont see how the rest of that stuff is going to work in the way they're displaying it.

I see where you are coming from, but I have a question for ya ...

do you have a problem with Sony's MGS4, Killzone 2, or Fight Night Round 3 videos, since they are just concept videos as well?
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: aswedc
they are keeping their system very simple minded. i can guarantee you that the (promised by nintendo) $200 or less price tag will make the Revolution go into many MANY more homes than the PS3 come xmas time.
Well, I sure hope that works out for them, because it didn't this generation.

Yeah, even a $200 price point is no guarantee of success, as this generation clearly showed. PS2 was the weakest in technology and matched the top-end in technology for price, yet it still sold more units.

What Nintendo really needs to do is have the best launch-lineup ever assembled, with games that appeal to the hardcore and to the "I don't play games" crowd. They need to hire a marketing firm that will aggressively market Revolution to every demographic imageinable and they need to make sure people have a chance to try out that sweet control system before the box ever launches.

Jason
 

DanTMWTMP

Lifer
Oct 7, 2001
15,908
19
81
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Originally posted by: aswedc
Nintendo has yet to show any sign they are planning to appeal to adult gamers again. There are what, like 4 titles on the Gamecube that aren't for kids or on every other system too? Also, they will not support HDTV. Microsoft has Xbox Live and 720p on everything. The PS3 doubles as a Blu-ray player.

Lack of games, inferior technology.

The controller may be good, or it may not. That is irrelevant. If its good, Microsoft and Sony will copy it immediately. It's not like the technology behind it is particularily revolutionary.

And Nintendo will lose, again.

Oh come off it. Sony and Microsoft, while introducing interesting new machines, are just doing the same damn thing that's been done for the last 10 years in gaming. This is something DIFFERENT, and I for one welcome something innovative to the market. It's clear that neither Sony nor Microsoft want to do anything innovative this time around, and say what you will about their HDTV support, but the *fact* is that while they're targeting maybe 10-15% of the market (HDTV's have yet to catch on for the mainstream consumer) Nintendo is targeting 100% of the market. It's entirely possible that the whole HDTV-centric advertising of both MS and Sony could blow up in their faces. With regard to specs, Rev's aren't even *released* yet, so you have no IDEA what they're going to be. And as any REAL gamer will tell you, it takes more than specs to make great games.

And please, don't be idiotic. If the Rev controller takes off, MS and Sony *can't* copy it immediately because they've already cast their lot with a standard controller that's only marginally different from current controllers. For developer support to catch on the controller has to be the *standard* controller for the system.

There is PLENTY of room in this market for 3 players, and in the end I expect to own all three systems. That said, the one I'm *most* anticipating right now is Revolution, because for the first time in a *decade* someone's offering something DIFFERENT.

Jason


yes i agree w/ dragonmaster. Besides, Nintendo "didn't lose" during the current gen of consoles. They made a PROFIT, unlike xbox. That's win in my opinion.
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Modeps
Madmalblipblapdawgguy: There is a huge difference between an FPS and what they were showing in that video. People were swinging the controller like a sword or a baseball bat... they wern't pointing and clicking. This could very well be the #1 FPS device for consoles, but I just dont see how the rest of that stuff is going to work in the way they're displaying it.

I see where you are coming from, but I have a question for ya ...

do you have a problem with Sony's MGS4, Killzone 2, or Fight Night Round 3 videos, since they are just concept videos as well?

Yes, I do. They're typical Sony hype crap. Killzone was a "concept" supposedly done "to spec". MGS4's trailer was a scripted sequence, not a *player* controlled sequence. In short, we have yet to see *any* actual gameplay on PS3. The same is true for Revolution, except of course that Nintendo's not pulling the typical Sony pre-launch overhype and unrealistic promises.

Jason
 

Queasy

Moderator<br>Console Gaming
Aug 24, 2001
31,796
2
0
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Modeps
Madmalblipblapdawgguy: There is a huge difference between an FPS and what they were showing in that video. People were swinging the controller like a sword or a baseball bat... they wern't pointing and clicking. This could very well be the #1 FPS device for consoles, but I just dont see how the rest of that stuff is going to work in the way they're displaying it.

I see where you are coming from, but I have a question for ya ...

do you have a problem with Sony's MGS4, Killzone 2, or Fight Night Round 3 videos, since they are just concept videos as well?

I know this isn't directed at me but, I for one am very disappointed in Sony again trying to push CGI/concept videos off as actual game play. They keep touting a Spring 2006 release but have yet to show a single playable game and have announced that their big event in Japan won't have any playable games either. This may be them not wanting to hurt their holiday sales for the PS2 and PSP but still.

Nintendo is saying Spring 2006 for the Revolution as well and haven't shown off any playable games.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,643
6,527
126
Originally posted by: Queasy
Originally posted by: purbeast0
Originally posted by: Modeps
Madmalblipblapdawgguy: There is a huge difference between an FPS and what they were showing in that video. People were swinging the controller like a sword or a baseball bat... they wern't pointing and clicking. This could very well be the #1 FPS device for consoles, but I just dont see how the rest of that stuff is going to work in the way they're displaying it.

I see where you are coming from, but I have a question for ya ...

do you have a problem with Sony's MGS4, Killzone 2, or Fight Night Round 3 videos, since they are just concept videos as well?

I know this isn't directed at me but, I for one am very disappointed in Sony again trying to push CGI/concept videos off as actual game play. They keep touting a Spring 2006 release but have yet to show a single playable game and have announced that their big event in Japan won't have any playable games either. This may be them not wanting to hurt their holiday sales for the PS2 and PSP but still.

Nintendo is saying Spring 2006 for the Revolution as well and haven't shown off any playable games.

Well PS3 most likely won't be seen in the states until 2007. I wouldn't be surprised if we didn't see the Revolution stateside before the PS3.

And yes, I agree with the PS3 hype that its a buncha crap. I still too this date remember the PS2 video of the "old man face" that showed off the emotion engine. what a buncha crap.

Oh, you wanna see some more PS3 hype?

Check this video out ...
 

clickynext

Platinum Member
Dec 24, 2004
2,583
0
0
It looks cool, but it seems to me like rarely would gamers want to do excessive arm motions when playing a game.