I have every right to not like politics in my music. Anyway, the whole album sucked lyrically politics or not. The music was great but hearing a 40-year-old whine about daddy was too much. Now this.Originally posted by: aswedc
You called yourself "anti-politics", and therefore have no right to decide whether other peoples political views are valid.
I missed your edit in my response.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: ThePresence
MTV can do whatever they want. They're a private organization, they can make any rule they want. You don't have to agree with it.Originally posted by: Insane3D
He pulled out of the show because they wouldn't let him put a picture of Bush up...that's it. A picture...OMGTEHHORROR!!!!
You missed my point...but that's ok..
Let me clarify: MTV has the right to deny any prop, any person, any hat that they don't like, any earing, and necklace, any ANYTHING that they don't like.In your post you mentioned that MTV was saying they couldn't play, not them refusing.
It just seemed kind of obvious to me that you disagreed with MTV here. If I'm worng, I stand corrected.As for my opinion, pleae don't make assumptions.
I can, but that is totally not the point here. MTV has a problem with it, and that's all that matters. They don't like it. They are entitled to make their own rules.Can you explain to me what the problem is with having a picture up in the background of the President?
You'd have to ask MTV if they like that idea or not. It doesn't matter if I agree or not.Edit:
Would it be acceptable to perform in front of a picture of the President if you were singing a pro-GWB type song?
Originally posted by: dwell
I have every right to not like politics in my music. Anyway, the whole album sucked lyrically politics or not. The music was great but hearing a 40-year-old whine about daddy was too much. Now this.Originally posted by: aswedc
You called yourself "anti-politics", and therefore have no right to decide whether other peoples political views are valid.
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I missed your edit in my response.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: ThePresence
MTV can do whatever they want. They're a private organization, they can make any rule they want. You don't have to agree with it.Originally posted by: Insane3D
He pulled out of the show because they wouldn't let him put a picture of Bush up...that's it. A picture...OMGTEHHORROR!!!!
You missed my point...but that's ok..
Let me clarify: MTV has the right to deny any prop, any person, any hat that they don't like, any earing, and necklace, any ANYTHING that they don't like.In your post you mentioned that MTV was saying they couldn't play, not them refusing.
It just seemed kind of obvious to me that you disagreed with MTV here. If I'm worng, I stand corrected.As for my opinion, pleae don't make assumptions.
I can, but that is totally not the point here. MTV has a problem with it, and that's all that matters. They don't like it. They are entitled to make their own rules.Can you explain to me what the problem is with having a picture up in the background of the President?
You'd have to ask MTV if they like that idea or not. It doesn't matter if I agree or not.Edit:
Would it be acceptable to perform in front of a picture of the President if you were singing a pro-GWB type song?
I was a HUGE NiN fan from the first album. I didn't like With Teeth at all. Now seeing how it's infested with politics I really don't like it, this the topic, "NIN officially suck now". Politics alone did not kill NiN for me. It was sucking now combined with the trendy anti-Bush crap that pushed them over the edge.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Ok, I think you inadvertantly answered my question in this post. It sound like you never really like NIN anyway, so why post this and then say they suck now.
You claim to be anti-political, but you post this now like it changed your view of the band that apparently you never liked in the first place.
So, why may I ask, if you are "anti-political", did this particular story bother you?
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I understand what you were, and still saying...I'm not disputing MTV's rights here, although you keep replying to me like I am. I guess we just misuderstood each other.
Anyway, the questions I posted were not for MTV to answer, they were for you. I was asking your opinion. I could care less what MTV thinks...
Originally posted by: dwell
I was a HUGE NiN fan from the first album. I didn't like With Teeth at all. Now seeing how it's infested with politics I really don't like it, this the topic, "NIN officially suck now". Politics alone did not kill NiN for me. It was sucking now combined with the trendy anti-Bush crap that pushed them over the edge.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Ok, I think you inadvertantly answered my question in this post. It sound like you never really like NIN anyway, so why post this and then say they suck now.
You claim to be anti-political, but you post this now like it changed your view of the band that apparently you never liked in the first place.
So, why may I ask, if you are "anti-political", did this particular story bother you?
I like the new Green Day even though it's polluted with politics, but all together it's a great album. I just skip the songs American Idiot and Holiday.
Anyway, apologies for pissing on a hornets nest. Not my intention to start a political debate. You wont get one out of me anyway.
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I understand what you were, and still saying...I'm not disputing MTV's rights here, although you keep replying to me like I am. I guess we just misuderstood each other.
Anyway, the questions I posted were not for MTV to answer, they were for you. I was asking your opinion. I could care less what MTV thinks...
Okay, I don't like political music. That's just me. As a matter of fact, I don't like bands who get involved in politics even when they're off the stage. Springsteen really pissed me off with what he was doing during the presidential election, and I used to be a big fan. I'm not ever going to deny that they have the right to do it, I just personally don't like it.
I guess I am out of touch with the mainstream. Living in NYC I have to put up with anti-Bush rhetoric on a daily basis.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Thanks for clarifying that. As for politics in music, you really shouldn't be surprised. I'd argue it's at the lowest point it's been in years nowadays.
Originally posted by: Deadtrees
I wish Rage Against Machine starts a concert in your back yard.
I think so. I like bands because I like their music, not their opinions. I like actors because of their acting not because I like their opinions. Whenever they think they are more than what they are, it pisses me off. These are not elected officials, they can be the biggest idiots around, but they have a talent that people pay to see or hear. Their opinions are just their personal opinions, and they should understand that. If they want to dabble in politics they can run for office.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I understand what you were, and still saying...I'm not disputing MTV's rights here, although you keep replying to me like I am. I guess we just misuderstood each other.
Anyway, the questions I posted were not for MTV to answer, they were for you. I was asking your opinion. I could care less what MTV thinks...
Okay, I don't like political music. That's just me. As a matter of fact, I don't like bands who get involved in politics even when they're off the stage. Springsteen really pissed me off with what he was doing during the presidential election, and I used to be a big fan. I'm not ever going to deny that they have the right to do it, I just personally don't like it.
Fair enough...thanks for answering.
If I may just ask one question, would your opinion of Springsteen be the same now if he had been doing the same thing for the opposite person?
The difference is really, when you see Johnny Depp in a movie, he's playing a character and acting out someone's (probably non-political) script. When you listen to music by polticial people they usually singing about politics. I love Depp as an actor because if I didn't know anything about his personal life I would not know he's a political nutjob. With music it's all up in your face.Originally posted by: ThePresence
I think so. I like bands because I like their music, not their opinions. I like actors because their acting not because I like their opinions. Whenever they think they are more than what they are, it pisses me off. These are not elected officials, they can be the biggest idiots around, but they have a talent that people pay to see or hear. Their opinions are just their personal opinions, and they should understand that. If they want to dabble in politics they can run for office.
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I think so. I like bands because I like their music, not their opinions. I like actors because their acting not because I like their opinions. Whenever they think they are more than what they are, it pisses me off. These are not elected officials, they can be the biggest idiots around, but they have a talent that people pay to see or hear. Their opinions are meaningless, and they should understand that.
Originally posted by: dwell
The difference is really, when you see Johnny Depp in a movie, he's playing a character and acting out someone's (probably non-political) script. When you listen to music by polticial people they usually singing about politics. I love Depp as an actor because if I didn't know anything about his personal life I would not know he's a political nutjob. With music it's all up in your face.
I immediately edited that, because I knew you'd jump on me.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I think so. I like bands because I like their music, not their opinions. I like actors because their acting not because I like their opinions. Whenever they think they are more than what they are, it pisses me off. These are not elected officials, they can be the biggest idiots around, but they have a talent that people pay to see or hear. Their opinions are meaningless, and they should understand that.
Apart of your reply struck me as interesting. You say that their opinions are meaningless...how so. They may be meaningless to you, but I think they are still valid in having one.
What's curious to me is why people will be listening to what they have to say. All they are, are singers. Their opinions are no more valid than yours or mine. They have a large audience becaise they are talented musicians, not because they are political geniuses.I think it's natural for politics to be in music...to varying degrees. If someone really believes in something, and they are now in a position to have large numbers of people listen to what they have to say, it's very easy to see why they might have political messages in their music.
No, I can't ignore it. It's what the song stands for and what the band stands for.I'm curious why you can't seperate the two in music that you like. I mean, if there is an artist and songs you like, but the policital message bothers you, can't you just ignore it and enjoy the music?
![]()
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I think so. I like bands because I like their music, not their opinions. I like actors because of their acting not because I like their opinions. Whenever they think they are more than what they are, it pisses me off. These are not elected officials, they can be the biggest idiots around, but they have a talent that people pay to see or hear. Their opinions are just their personal opinions, and they should understand that. If they want to dabble in politics they can run for office.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I understand what you were, and still saying...I'm not disputing MTV's rights here, although you keep replying to me like I am. I guess we just misuderstood each other.
Anyway, the questions I posted were not for MTV to answer, they were for you. I was asking your opinion. I could care less what MTV thinks...
Okay, I don't like political music. That's just me. As a matter of fact, I don't like bands who get involved in politics even when they're off the stage. Springsteen really pissed me off with what he was doing during the presidential election, and I used to be a big fan. I'm not ever going to deny that they have the right to do it, I just personally don't like it.
Fair enough...thanks for answering.
If I may just ask one question, would your opinion of Springsteen be the same now if he had been doing the same thing for the opposite person?
I immediately edited that, because I knew you'd jump on me. I changed it to "Their opinions are just their opinions, nothing more".
What's curious to me is why people will be listening to what they have to say. All they are, are singers. Their opinions are no more valid than yours or mine. They have a large audience becaise they are talented musicians, not because they are political geniuses.
No, I can't ignore it. It's what the song stands for and what the band stands for.
Originally posted by: ibintegra
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I think so. I like bands because I like their music, not their opinions. I like actors because of their acting not because I like their opinions. Whenever they think they are more than what they are, it pisses me off. These are not elected officials, they can be the biggest idiots around, but they have a talent that people pay to see or hear. Their opinions are just their personal opinions, and they should understand that. If they want to dabble in politics they can run for office.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I understand what you were, and still saying...I'm not disputing MTV's rights here, although you keep replying to me like I am. I guess we just misuderstood each other.
Anyway, the questions I posted were not for MTV to answer, they were for you. I was asking your opinion. I could care less what MTV thinks...
Okay, I don't like political music. That's just me. As a matter of fact, I don't like bands who get involved in politics even when they're off the stage. Springsteen really pissed me off with what he was doing during the presidential election, and I used to be a big fan. I'm not ever going to deny that they have the right to do it, I just personally don't like it.
Fair enough...thanks for answering.
If I may just ask one question, would your opinion of Springsteen be the same now if he had been doing the same thing for the opposite person?
Based on your conclusion nobody should be allowed to form a political opinion except for those who plan to run for office.
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: ibintegra
Originally posted by: ThePresence
I think so. I like bands because I like their music, not their opinions. I like actors because of their acting not because I like their opinions. Whenever they think they are more than what they are, it pisses me off. These are not elected officials, they can be the biggest idiots around, but they have a talent that people pay to see or hear. Their opinions are just their personal opinions, and they should understand that. If they want to dabble in politics they can run for office.Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I understand what you were, and still saying...I'm not disputing MTV's rights here, although you keep replying to me like I am. I guess we just misuderstood each other.
Anyway, the questions I posted were not for MTV to answer, they were for you. I was asking your opinion. I could care less what MTV thinks...
Okay, I don't like political music. That's just me. As a matter of fact, I don't like bands who get involved in politics even when they're off the stage. Springsteen really pissed me off with what he was doing during the presidential election, and I used to be a big fan. I'm not ever going to deny that they have the right to do it, I just personally don't like it.
Fair enough...thanks for answering.
If I may just ask one question, would your opinion of Springsteen be the same now if he had been doing the same thing for the opposite person?
Based on your conclusion nobody should be allowed to form a political opinion except for those who plan to run for office.
I don't see how you get that. Anyone can have a political opinion, I just don't have to buy the CD's that they preach their politics on. I am not denying their right to have an opinion, I just don't like when a band or actor preaches their opinion as if someone cares what they think. The reason they have an auidence is not because of what they think, but because of their talent. They should realize that. Again, this is just MY opinion, I'm not denying their right to think or preach what they do. I just don't have to agree with it.
