• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

NHL playoffs 2011 thread

Page 48 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
And you sir, are a moron :biggrin:

It was not even boarding.

NotSureIfSerious.jpg


Reckless. He deserved the 5 min major. 3-4.
 
At least I get to go to game 4. Watching this on Versus is painful 🙂

San Diego Sharks
 
Last edited:
Why do Americans think that calling a Canadian "Canadian" is an insult?

He did deserve the 5, btw.

Canadian is an insult now? OK, thanks for that. 🙂

Edit: Canuck Canuck Canuck Canuck Canuck.

I just insulted you five times

Oh, and I've never seen a boarding call with two guys contacting back to back, but hey, it's just the playoffs.
 
Last edited:
Shoulder to shoulder. If anything, they could call it a 2 minute charging penalty.

41.1 Boarding – A boarding penalty shall be imposed on any player or goalkeeper who checks an opponent in such a manner that causes the opponent to be thrown violently in the boards. The severity of the penalty, based upon the degree of violence of the impact with the boards, shall be at the discretion of the Referee.
There is an enormous amount of judgment involved in the application of this rule by the Referees. The onus is on the player applying the check to ensure his opponent is not in a vulnerable position and if so, he must avoid the contact. However, there is also a responsibility on the player with the puck to avoid placing himself in a dangerous and vulnerable position. This balance must be considered by the Referees when applying this rule.

twitpic

Got him blindside with a shoulder to the head.
 
McGinn didn't leave his feet, didn't hit him from behind. Seems like a pretty emotional response from the refs.

And, according to rule 41.1, the Canucks were boarding the Blackhawks all series long but it never got called.
 
McGinn didn't leave his feet, didn't hit him from behind. Seems like a pretty emotional response from the refs.

And, according to rule 41.1, the Canucks were boarding the Blackhawks all series long but it never got called.

The onus is on the player applying the check to ensure his opponent is not in a vulnerable position and if so, he must avoid the contact.

Hitting a player into the boards is fine, but you can't do it if the player is in a vulnerable position. Eager's hit on Sedin was easily as bad and was major worthy, had it not have been for Sedin turning his back and putting himself in a more vulnerable position, thus the refs thought it was a minor.
 
Back
Top