Originally posted by: Modeps
Originally posted by: Anubis
id rather watch hockey then the sh!tty NBA
I cant stand the NBA, but I love NCAA. No real huge names. No huge egos. No "team" based on a single player.
I love hockey, and even if the NHL goes away, I'll continue to play. I've watched my beloved Penguins turn into an utter joke, even with the return of the man that got me interested in hockey. I've watched the 'wonder boy' Jagr jump from team to team and end up where so many other has-beens go, the Rangers.
I still find it hard to place any reliance in a team that changes players like trading cards. I enjoy watching the same players, wear the same colors, play with the same lines.
Originally posted by: rh71
2 things I can definitely agree with:
- bye bye Bettman
- widen the rink (angles play a huge role in hockey esp. if you're trying to defend passing/shooting lanes)
- they're already talking about downsizing goalie pads
Sorry, that's just stupid.Originally posted by: jurzdevil
also to open up play and avoid a trap they should eliminate calling two line passes. there would be a lot more breakaways and open play if you can pass from inside your zone to a guy just outside your offensive zone
Heh the first thing that comes to mind with changes like this that would open up breakaway opportunities one after another... well those old records in the books won't stand for very long... kinda takes away from others who had to play by the rules... (though with less clutching / grabbing and traps)Originally posted by: Modeps
Sorry, that's just stupid.Originally posted by: jurzdevil
also to open up play and avoid a trap they should eliminate calling two line passes. there would be a lot more breakaways and open play if you can pass from inside your zone to a guy just outside your offensive zone
Originally posted by: Modeps
Sorry, that's just stupid.Originally posted by: jurzdevil
also to open up play and avoid a trap they should eliminate calling two line passes. there would be a lot more breakaways and open play if you can pass from inside your zone to a guy just outside your offensive zone
Originally posted by: silverpig
What's funny too is while these are the lowest rated finals in recent history in the USA, game 1 was the second HIGHEST rated game in cup history in Canada (the '94 final between Vancouver and NYR was higher). I bet game 6 tomorrow will be even higher.
Originally posted by: Thump553
For the past decade or so the NHL has been on a policy of transferring or forming new franchises in southern US cities and abandoning the Canadian and established franchises. The belief was to grow interest in the sport while retaining the old fanbase.
This policy has been a total and dismal failure. Ice hockey in places like Tampa is more akin to roller derby than a real sport. Old fans, like myself, no longer watch NHL games when the local franchise is uprooted.
Thuggery is another major turnoff in the NHL today. Too often the games seem to center around scripted fights, like "professional wrestling." Again, a turn off to sports fans.
I'm no longer interested at all in the NHL and could care less if the entire league implodes. College hockey is a lot more interesting to me.
For future reference... it's "voila".Originally posted by: Blastomyces
What they ought to do is call the game as it's supposed to be called. Ten years ago you couldnt put a stick on someone without getting a penalty. Nowadays you can mug a player all you want and it's OK, as long as they dont fall down. Wah-lah, instant flow to the game.
What I don't understand really... hockey is a unique sport. By that I mean you grow into it at a very young age and you play the game because you love it... in most cases since age 3-5. Your teammates are your family. There's a special comraderie amongst players (I can feel it in the locker room)... opposing players say hello to you for no reason other than because you play the game you enjoy equally. What made these professional players (the same kids who grew up on a frozen pond playing the game for endless hours till dark) think they can take millions and still demand more ? The damned players association needs to realize what's good for the game. Set the cap, bring in whoever it is that still wants to play in this league... cause I know there will be plenty.Originally posted by: Squisher
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.
I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
Originally posted by: rh71
What I don't understand really... hockey is a unique sport. By that I mean you grow into it at a very young age and you play the game because you love it... in most cases since age 3-5. Your teammates are your family. There's a special comraderie amongst players (I can feel it in the locker room)... opposing players say hello to you for no reason other than because you play the game you enjoy equally. What made these professional players (the same kids who grew up on a frozen pond playing the game for endless hours till dark) think they can take millions and still demand more ? The damned players association needs to realize what's good for the game. Set the cap, bring in whoever it is that still wants to play in this league... cause I know there will be plenty.Originally posted by: Squisher
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.
I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
LOL... I haven't washed my $#!T ever... I played 7 games of ice hockey 2 weekends ago (24 hour tournament) and I was regretting putting those shin guards on more and more after each game. It was getting pretty nasty.Originally posted by: Aquaman
Originally posted by: rh71
What I don't understand really... hockey is a unique sport. By that I mean you grow into it at a very young age and you play the game because you love it... in most cases since age 3-5. Your teammates are your family. There's a special comraderie amongst players (I can feel it in the locker room)... opposing players say hello to you for no reason other than because you play the game you enjoy equally. What made these professional players (the same kids who grew up on a frozen pond playing the game for endless hours till dark) think they can take millions and still demand more ? The damned players association needs to realize what's good for the game. Set the cap, bring in whoever it is that still wants to play in this league... cause I know there will be plenty.Originally posted by: Squisher
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.
I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
Are you sure that is not the smell of the moldy equipment
Cheers,
Aquaman <<<<<<<< gets his equipment professionally cleaned![]()
Originally posted by: rh71
LOL... I haven't washed my $#!T ever... I played 7 games of ice hockey 2 weekends ago (24 hour tournament) and I was regretting putting those shin guards on more and more after each game. It was getting pretty nasty.Originally posted by: Aquaman
Originally posted by: rh71
What I don't understand really... hockey is a unique sport. By that I mean you grow into it at a very young age and you play the game because you love it... in most cases since age 3-5. Your teammates are your family. There's a special comraderie amongst players (I can feel it in the locker room)... opposing players say hello to you for no reason other than because you play the game you enjoy equally. What made these professional players (the same kids who grew up on a frozen pond playing the game for endless hours till dark) think they can take millions and still demand more ? The damned players association needs to realize what's good for the game. Set the cap, bring in whoever it is that still wants to play in this league... cause I know there will be plenty.Originally posted by: Squisher
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.
I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
Are you sure that is not the smell of the moldy equipment
Cheers,
Aquaman <<<<<<<< gets his equipment professionally cleaned![]()
It's true though... there's a certain level of respect in the game that just doesn't exist for any other sport. Money shouldn't be able to ruin this game but apparently unions are capable of anything. :|
The NHL's problem is, well, that it doesn't have only one problem,
beginning with an unbalanced economy in which many teams say they are
losing money at the same time players are averaging $1.8 million in
salary.
The NHL, much like Pro Football Hall of Fame coach Chuck Noll once
said of a fumble-prone running back, has many problems and they are
great:
-- The sport has struggled to grow new fans, partly because scoring
has dropped to a soccer-like level, from eight goals per game in
1981-82 to 5.1 this season.
-- NFL teams get about $77 million a year in TV revenue, compared to
about $2 million each NHL team is due next season, yet top-tier players
in both leagues often have comparable salaries. That's why NHL owners
are determined to negotiate a hard salary cap that could dramatically
rein in free spending by richer clubs such as the New York Rangers and
the Detroit Red Wings.
-- To make up for the TV revenue imbalance, the NHL traditionally has
some of the highest top-end ticket prices in pro sports. But as ticket
prices steadily increased, some middle-income fans bailed out. Now, to
draw those fans back, numerous teams are lowering ticket prices, which,
in turn could mean lower revenues and lower franchise values.
-- Even when the hockey is good, as it sometimes was during these
playoffs, incidents such as Todd Bertuzzi's on-ice attack of Colorado's
Steve Moore leave some with the impression the sport doesn't care if
it's perceived to be nothing more than pro wrestling on skates.
Hall of Fame goalie Ken Dryden, who recently left the Maple Leafs'
front office to run for political office, said the all-out commitment
to defense has caused the game to become far too physical --
essentially, an extreme sport.
-- The league has spent years developing hockey interest in
nontraditional markets such as Atlanta, Nashville, Phoenix, Anaheim and
Tampa Bay, and not very successfully in some cases. Now, if the sport
vanishes from the sports landscape for a long period, it may have to
start again in cities that have had teams for years.
-- And what about Washington, Chicago and Pittsburgh, teams that were
losing fans even before the labor talks? Will they come back in 12 or
18 or 21 months if they perceive the product they will watch is no
better than that they saw before?
-- Will the sport ever build a TV audience beyond those in its
cornerstone markets? The ratings for the finals have been anemic, with
Games 1 and 2 among the lowest-rated Stanley Cup games on ESPN since
1990, and the rest of the series on ABC not faring much better. If the
sport disappears for a considerable period, how many casual fans or
viewers will notice when it comes back?