NHL on path for a major collapse

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
2 things I can definitely agree with:

- bye bye Bettman
- widen the rink (angles play a huge role in hockey esp. if you're trying to defend passing/shooting lanes)

- they're already talking about downsizing goalie pads
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: Modeps
Originally posted by: Anubis
id rather watch hockey then the sh!tty NBA

I cant stand the NBA, but I love NCAA. No real huge names. No huge egos. No "team" based on a single player.

I love hockey, and even if the NHL goes away, I'll continue to play. I've watched my beloved Penguins turn into an utter joke, even with the return of the man that got me interested in hockey. I've watched the 'wonder boy' Jagr jump from team to team and end up where so many other has-beens go, the Rangers.

I still find it hard to place any reliance in a team that changes players like trading cards. I enjoy watching the same players, wear the same colors, play with the same lines.

yea im like you i love the NCAA all good fun, and ive suffered watching teh Bruins Fusk things up for years, just like every other boston team, o well i still watch
 

jurzdevil

Golden Member
Feb 3, 2002
1,258
0
0
the problem is that the teams that are winning are built as a team to win the cup. not to draw in crowds or tons of money or ratings. hockey players and owners and coaches and others want the cup. sure they like the cash but most have a dream since they were a kid to win a cup.

now the organizations that spend the cash on the superstars, like the rangers, detroit, and dallas... arent winning since they took the approach of get the best guys to draw the crowds and make the revenue and hopefully they will win the cup.


in the late 90s, that was working. but then the devils came back with an actual team and win in 2000 like they did in 95. now other teamscaught on and we have the finals we have now. ive watched every game and it has been a hell of a series. some of the best hockey ive seen in a while. but since the two teams in it arent raking in the cash for the nhl, its getting on their nerves.

the first article posted, i think, has some good points but skews a few more things out of proportion.

as posted above...the nhl definately needs to axe bettman. change is good and he has been the same for too long.

im sure all sports will start to suffer more now that pop culture crap like american idol and mtv are becoming more popular to watch than go outside and a play a sport and or go watch a professional team.

oh yeh...blame dubya too...he has to have had done something to this too;)
 

jurzdevil

Golden Member
Feb 3, 2002
1,258
0
0
Originally posted by: rh71
2 things I can definitely agree with:

- bye bye Bettman
- widen the rink (angles play a huge role in hockey esp. if you're trying to defend passing/shooting lanes)

- they're already talking about downsizing goalie pads

they also want to allow touching up to the blue line to avoid the offsides


also to open up play and avoid a trap they should eliminate calling two line passes. there would be a lot more breakaways and open play if you can pass from inside your zone to a guy just outside your offensive zone
 

Modeps

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
17,254
44
91
Originally posted by: jurzdevil
also to open up play and avoid a trap they should eliminate calling two line passes. there would be a lot more breakaways and open play if you can pass from inside your zone to a guy just outside your offensive zone
Sorry, that's just stupid.
 

RaynorWolfcastle

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
8,968
16
81
BTW, I'd like to add that the current Cup finals is one of the best case scenarios for fans (not the NHL). You have two teams that are playing an open style and the hockey is simply incredibly entertaining. This final is so much better than the Anaheim vs New Jersey trapfest we had last year. Hopefully, coaches will take notice that the trap is only a decent solution if you have a sh!t team with no talent.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: Modeps
Originally posted by: jurzdevil
also to open up play and avoid a trap they should eliminate calling two line passes. there would be a lot more breakaways and open play if you can pass from inside your zone to a guy just outside your offensive zone
Sorry, that's just stupid.
Heh the first thing that comes to mind with changes like this that would open up breakaway opportunities one after another... well those old records in the books won't stand for very long... kinda takes away from others who had to play by the rules... (though with less clutching / grabbing and traps)
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,824
2,613
136
For the past decade or so the NHL has been on a policy of transferring or forming new franchises in southern US cities and abandoning the Canadian and established franchises. The belief was to grow interest in the sport while retaining the old fanbase.

This policy has been a total and dismal failure. Ice hockey in places like Tampa is more akin to roller derby than a real sport. Old fans, like myself, no longer watch NHL games when the local franchise is uprooted.

Thuggery is another major turnoff in the NHL today. Too often the games seem to center around scripted fights, like "professional wrestling." Again, a turn off to sports fans.

I'm no longer interested at all in the NHL and could care less if the entire league implodes. College hockey is a lot more interesting to me.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
Originally posted by: Modeps
Originally posted by: jurzdevil
also to open up play and avoid a trap they should eliminate calling two line passes. there would be a lot more breakaways and open play if you can pass from inside your zone to a guy just outside your offensive zone
Sorry, that's just stupid.

? It's a great idea. I'd love to see some more long passes. Get some guys who can skate and not just clutch/grab. Why cripple the offense like that?
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
What's funny too is while these are the lowest rated finals in recent history in the USA, game 1 was the second HIGHEST rated game in cup history in Canada (the '94 final between Vancouver and NYR was higher). I bet game 6 tomorrow will be even higher.
 

Aquaman

Lifer
Dec 17, 1999
25,054
13
0
Originally posted by: silverpig
What's funny too is while these are the lowest rated finals in recent history in the USA, game 1 was the second HIGHEST rated game in cup history in Canada (the '94 final between Vancouver and NYR was higher). I bet game 6 tomorrow will be even higher.

Word up Boss Hog ;)

Cheers,
Aquaman
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Originally posted by: Thump553
For the past decade or so the NHL has been on a policy of transferring or forming new franchises in southern US cities and abandoning the Canadian and established franchises. The belief was to grow interest in the sport while retaining the old fanbase.

This policy has been a total and dismal failure. Ice hockey in places like Tampa is more akin to roller derby than a real sport. Old fans, like myself, no longer watch NHL games when the local franchise is uprooted.

Thuggery is another major turnoff in the NHL today. Too often the games seem to center around scripted fights, like "professional wrestling." Again, a turn off to sports fans.

I'm no longer interested at all in the NHL and could care less if the entire league implodes. College hockey is a lot more interesting to me.

Winner.
 

Blastomyces

Banned
Mar 23, 2004
482
0
0
What they ought to do is call the game as it's supposed to be called. Ten years ago you couldnt put a stick on someone without getting a penalty. Nowadays you can mug a player all you want and it's OK, as long as they dont fall down. Wah-lah, instant flow to the game.
 

Squisher

Lifer
Aug 17, 2000
21,204
66
91
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.

I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: Blastomyces
What they ought to do is call the game as it's supposed to be called. Ten years ago you couldnt put a stick on someone without getting a penalty. Nowadays you can mug a player all you want and it's OK, as long as they dont fall down. Wah-lah, instant flow to the game.
For future reference... it's "voila". ;)

I'm curious... did they finish their bodychecks like they do today 10 years ago ? I don't remember seeing Wayne or Mario getting nailed into the boards like Sakic, Kariya, Modano do these days... it's a lot rougher out there and if you're gonna call everything... you may as well take checking out of the game and call it basketball. Those guys were given a ton of time and space. In order to win (and not let a guy score 4 goals on you in 1 night), you have to play the body... it's still part of the game. Clutching and grabbing, no... but tight checking and harmless hacks to the hands to let them know you're there can't be taken away...
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: Squisher
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.

I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
What I don't understand really... hockey is a unique sport. By that I mean you grow into it at a very young age and you play the game because you love it... in most cases since age 3-5. Your teammates are your family. There's a special comraderie amongst players (I can feel it in the locker room)... opposing players say hello to you for no reason other than because you play the game you enjoy equally. What made these professional players (the same kids who grew up on a frozen pond playing the game for endless hours till dark) think they can take millions and still demand more ? The damned players association needs to realize what's good for the game. Set the cap, bring in whoever it is that still wants to play in this league... cause I know there will be plenty.
 

Aquaman

Lifer
Dec 17, 1999
25,054
13
0
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: Squisher
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.

I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
What I don't understand really... hockey is a unique sport. By that I mean you grow into it at a very young age and you play the game because you love it... in most cases since age 3-5. Your teammates are your family. There's a special comraderie amongst players (I can feel it in the locker room)... opposing players say hello to you for no reason other than because you play the game you enjoy equally. What made these professional players (the same kids who grew up on a frozen pond playing the game for endless hours till dark) think they can take millions and still demand more ? The damned players association needs to realize what's good for the game. Set the cap, bring in whoever it is that still wants to play in this league... cause I know there will be plenty.

Are you sure that is not the smell of the moldy equipment ;)

Cheers,
Aquaman <<<<<<<< gets his equipment professionally cleaned :D
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: Aquaman
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: Squisher
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.

I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
What I don't understand really... hockey is a unique sport. By that I mean you grow into it at a very young age and you play the game because you love it... in most cases since age 3-5. Your teammates are your family. There's a special comraderie amongst players (I can feel it in the locker room)... opposing players say hello to you for no reason other than because you play the game you enjoy equally. What made these professional players (the same kids who grew up on a frozen pond playing the game for endless hours till dark) think they can take millions and still demand more ? The damned players association needs to realize what's good for the game. Set the cap, bring in whoever it is that still wants to play in this league... cause I know there will be plenty.

Are you sure that is not the smell of the moldy equipment ;)

Cheers,
Aquaman <<<<<<<< gets his equipment professionally cleaned :D
LOL... I haven't washed my $#!T ever... I played 7 games of ice hockey 2 weekends ago (24 hour tournament) and I was regretting putting those shin guards on more and more after each game. It was getting pretty nasty. ;)

It's true though... there's a certain level of respect in the game that just doesn't exist for any other sport. Money shouldn't be able to ruin this game but apparently unions are capable of anything. :|
 

Aquaman

Lifer
Dec 17, 1999
25,054
13
0
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: Aquaman
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: Squisher
I don't want to take sides here, but as I understand Hockey returns to the players a much higher percentage of revenues (75% I think) than any of the other 3 major sports.

I'll miss it if there isn't a season.
What I don't understand really... hockey is a unique sport. By that I mean you grow into it at a very young age and you play the game because you love it... in most cases since age 3-5. Your teammates are your family. There's a special comraderie amongst players (I can feel it in the locker room)... opposing players say hello to you for no reason other than because you play the game you enjoy equally. What made these professional players (the same kids who grew up on a frozen pond playing the game for endless hours till dark) think they can take millions and still demand more ? The damned players association needs to realize what's good for the game. Set the cap, bring in whoever it is that still wants to play in this league... cause I know there will be plenty.

Are you sure that is not the smell of the moldy equipment ;)

Cheers,
Aquaman <<<<<<<< gets his equipment professionally cleaned :D
LOL... I haven't washed my $#!T ever... I played 7 games of ice hockey 2 weekends ago (24 hour tournament) and I was regretting putting those shin guards on more and more after each game. It was getting pretty nasty. ;)

It's true though... there's a certain level of respect in the game that just doesn't exist for any other sport. Money shouldn't be able to ruin this game but apparently unions are capable of anything. :|

Get it celaned twice a year if you play often. Some placees use ozone &amp; soe placees have equipment washers &amp; driers. Well worth it.

Cheers,
Aquaman
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Well tonight's game 7 can possibly be the last NHL game we see for a long long time...
The NHL's problem is, well, that it doesn't have only one problem,
beginning with an unbalanced economy in which many teams say they are
losing money at the same time players are averaging $1.8 million in
salary.

The NHL, much like Pro Football Hall of Fame coach Chuck Noll once
said of a fumble-prone running back, has many problems and they are
great:

-- The sport has struggled to grow new fans, partly because scoring
has dropped to a soccer-like level, from eight goals per game in
1981-82 to 5.1 this season.

-- NFL teams get about $77 million a year in TV revenue, compared to
about $2 million each NHL team is due next season, yet top-tier players
in both leagues often have comparable salaries. That's why NHL owners
are determined to negotiate a hard salary cap that could dramatically
rein in free spending by richer clubs such as the New York Rangers and
the Detroit Red Wings.

-- To make up for the TV revenue imbalance, the NHL traditionally has
some of the highest top-end ticket prices in pro sports. But as ticket
prices steadily increased, some middle-income fans bailed out. Now, to
draw those fans back, numerous teams are lowering ticket prices, which,
in turn could mean lower revenues and lower franchise values.

-- Even when the hockey is good, as it sometimes was during these
playoffs, incidents such as Todd Bertuzzi's on-ice attack of Colorado's
Steve Moore leave some with the impression the sport doesn't care if
it's perceived to be nothing more than pro wrestling on skates.

Hall of Fame goalie Ken Dryden, who recently left the Maple Leafs'
front office to run for political office, said the all-out commitment
to defense has caused the game to become far too physical --
essentially, an extreme sport.

-- The league has spent years developing hockey interest in
nontraditional markets such as Atlanta, Nashville, Phoenix, Anaheim and
Tampa Bay, and not very successfully in some cases. Now, if the sport
vanishes from the sports landscape for a long period, it may have to
start again in cities that have had teams for years.

-- And what about Washington, Chicago and Pittsburgh, teams that were
losing fans even before the labor talks? Will they come back in 12 or
18 or 21 months if they perceive the product they will watch is no
better than that they saw before?

-- Will the sport ever build a TV audience beyond those in its
cornerstone markets? The ratings for the finals have been anemic, with
Games 1 and 2 among the lowest-rated Stanley Cup games on ESPN since
1990, and the rest of the series on ABC not faring much better. If the
sport disappears for a considerable period, how many casual fans or
viewers will notice when it comes back?
 

KokomoGST

Diamond Member
Nov 13, 2001
3,758
0
0
So sad... it's a shame. This may actually kill hockey... and too many people don't like the sport because it's "complicated"...

I think the main reason is that you don't really see kids play it or as extracurricular in HS. That's why people know how football, baseball, and basketball work.
 

NotoriousJTC

Golden Member
Nov 19, 2000
1,406
0
0
The NHL cannot afford to go on haitus for a year, not with the amount of alternative forms of entertainment out there. They've spent too much time and money in past 10 years of marketing and building thier product to have it go to waste like this... But then again, it might not be able to afford to opperate at this rate for much longer either.


<-- Life long fan of hockey, the Vancouver Canucks, and the NHL.
 

I will watch hockey until the day I die.

The players are way overpaid for the money the teams bring in. Hardly any teams make any money because of the PA.

Hockey is also a sport that is not easily taken up by youngsters. The amount of time and capital parents have to invest to play the game is far above and beyond almost all other "major" sports. There is no easy way to play a pick up game of ice hockey. So (not to stereotype) most of the lower income bracket demographic of America cannot participate.
Where as with baseball, all you need to do is hand your kid your old mitt, get some cleats and sell some overpriced candybars at friday night bowling leagues.

I've seen people say that hockey is too complicated? Comon, if you can understand basketball, you can understand hockey just as easy.
Scoring is too low? I suppose, but that's the game. On the opposite spectrum scoring in basketball is too HIGH. Extremely boring.

Either which way, I was born a hockey fan, I'll die one.
 

wicktron

Platinum Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,573
0
76
nba > *, but i'd hate to see the nhl go.
the reason why not as many people like hockey is that watching it on tv sucks. it's the most boring experience outside of watching the senior pga tour. it's a great live experience, but not everybody can make it out to a game.