Mermaidman
Diamond Member
- Sep 4, 2003
- 7,987
- 93
- 91
Originally posted by: pyonir
One of the best receivers in the league for a second round draft pick, huh? Wow is right.
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
I'm hearing rumors floating around about Charlie Garner to Denver.
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
I'm hearing rumors floating around about Charlie Garner to Denver.
I, for one, would be glad to see him back in a Niner uniform Garner + Barlow would be an AWESOME one-two punch
Originally posted by: maddogchen
TO gone for a 2nd round pick? garcia gone too. Stupid niners....I mean stupid front office and team owner. BOOOOOO
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
I'm hearing rumors floating around about Charlie Garner to Denver.
I, for one, would be glad to see him back in a Niner uniform Garner + Barlow would be an AWESOME one-two punch
It doesn't matter much for the Niners. They are looking at a season that could possibly be worse than this season.
Niners key UFA's:
Julian Peterson
Ahmed Plummer
Tai Streets
John Engleberger
Kevin Barlow is a RFA...They also need a New QB, unless they plan on using Rattay (inconsistent). Some help at WR of course...
To top it all off, they have one of the biggest NFL flops at the head coach position, Dennis Erickson.
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
I'm hearing rumors floating around about Charlie Garner to Denver.
Originally posted by: ClueLis
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
I'm hearing rumors floating around about Charlie Garner to Denver.
That doesn't fit the style of back they've had over the past, but they seem to be able to accomodate ANY back with that o-line of theirs.
I understand that the Niners got a pick when TO should have simply been a free agent and that they were under time constraints, but they should have been able to get more. Hell, I think the Pats got a fourth and a third rounder for Terry Glenn, which I would consider about equivalent.
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
The thing to realize, for people who think SF got the shaft in only getting a 2nd rounder, is that if they couldn't QUICKLY reach an agreement with a team for compensation, Owens and the union were going to file a grievance with the league about whether Owens was actually a free agent or not.
The agent missed the deadline because of a subsequent change in the rules regarding when you had to notify the league about voiding a contract. The contract Owens signed actually said "send notice by March 2nd" or whatever, and it was only a subsequent change that affected it.
So SF could have ended up with nothing. Instead, they took a mid-2nd round pick just to be sure they didn't end up getting the shaft in the end.
While it is true that if Owens were to become an FA the Niners would have gained absolutely nothing from his leaving. However, Owens did not become an FA (circumstances are irrelevant, what happened, happened) so I expected to get more out of this.
I can see why they're doing what they're doing (the front office), building a team through the draft has worked for them in the past, but times have changed and the era of Free Agency has brought a whole new level of complexity to the way the game of football is played in the NFL.
There's a silver lining on every cloud, so this isn't all bad. I just think they could have done a whole lot better...
Originally posted by: maddogchen
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
I'm hearing rumors floating around about Charlie Garner to Denver.
I, for one, would be glad to see him back in a Niner uniform Garner + Barlow would be an AWESOME one-two punch
It doesn't matter much for the Niners. They are looking at a season that could possibly be worse than this season.
Niners key UFA's:
Julian Peterson
Ahmed Plummer
Tai Streets
John Engleberger
Kevin Barlow is a RFA...They also need a New QB, unless they plan on using Rattay (inconsistent). Some help at WR of course...
To top it all off, they have one of the biggest NFL flops at the head coach position, Dennis Erickson.
Yes, all you niner fans, time to jump ship :disgust:
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
T.O. To Baltimore
The 49ers traded wide receiver Terrell Owens to the Ravens for a second-round choice in this year's draft, the 51st overall pick. The Ravens will pick up the final three years of Owens' contract valued at around $17 million.
Wow.
Originally posted by: Ynog
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
The thing to realize, for people who think SF got the shaft in only getting a 2nd rounder, is that if they couldn't QUICKLY reach an agreement with a team for compensation, Owens and the union were going to file a grievance with the league about whether Owens was actually a free agent or not.
The agent missed the deadline because of a subsequent change in the rules regarding when you had to notify the league about voiding a contract. The contract Owens signed actually said "send notice by March 2nd" or whatever, and it was only a subsequent change that affected it.
So SF could have ended up with nothing. Instead, they took a mid-2nd round pick just to be sure they didn't end up getting the shaft in the end.
While it is true that if Owens were to become an FA the Niners would have gained absolutely nothing from his leaving. However, Owens did not become an FA (circumstances are irrelevant, what happened, happened) so I expected to get more out of this.
I can see why they're doing what they're doing (the front office), building a team through the draft has worked for them in the past, but times have changed and the era of Free Agency has brought a whole new level of complexity to the way the game of football is played in the NFL.
There's a silver lining on every cloud, so this isn't all bad. I just think they could have done a whole lot better...
Its true that TO was still a Niner, but the fact remains that its because of a change in rules by the NFL, that TO didn't send
notice. His contract does state 2nd of March. Now if TO filed a grievance the odds were in his favor that he would
be granted free agency. This wasn't like the basketball player whose agent wasn't smart enough to exercise the option
in his contract. TO's contract stated he had until the 2nd of March, the change in NFL rules made it eariler. That
simple confusion would probably have been enough to grant him free agency.
Now I also expect to see TO renegoiate his contract in Baltimore. But I would love to see Garcia end up in Baltimore.
That would be funny.
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
The thing to realize, for people who think SF got the shaft in only getting a 2nd rounder, is that if they couldn't QUICKLY reach an agreement with a team for compensation, Owens and the union were going to file a grievance with the league about whether Owens was actually a free agent or not.
The agent missed the deadline because of a subsequent change in the rules regarding when you had to notify the league about voiding a contract. The contract Owens signed actually said "send notice by March 2nd" or whatever, and it was only a subsequent change that affected it.
So SF could have ended up with nothing. Instead, they took a mid-2nd round pick just to be sure they didn't end up getting the shaft in the end.
While it is true that if Owens were to become an FA the Niners would have gained absolutely nothing from his leaving. However, Owens did not become an FA (circumstances are irrelevant, what happened, happened) so I expected to get more out of this.
I can see why they're doing what they're doing (the front office), building a team through the draft has worked for them in the past, but times have changed and the era of Free Agency has brought a whole new level of complexity to the way the game of football is played in the NFL.
There's a silver lining on every cloud, so this isn't all bad. I just think they could have done a whole lot better...
Originally posted by: 777php
didn't the league office say something about compensating the niners with a pick in between the 1st and 2nd rounds for the TO debacle? That pick would have been the 33rd pick right? Whatever happened to that deal?
Originally posted by: maddogchen
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: Saulbadguy
The thing to realize, for people who think SF got the shaft in only getting a 2nd rounder, is that if they couldn't QUICKLY reach an agreement with a team for compensation, Owens and the union were going to file a grievance with the league about whether Owens was actually a free agent or not.
The agent missed the deadline because of a subsequent change in the rules regarding when you had to notify the league about voiding a contract. The contract Owens signed actually said "send notice by March 2nd" or whatever, and it was only a subsequent change that affected it.
So SF could have ended up with nothing. Instead, they took a mid-2nd round pick just to be sure they didn't end up getting the shaft in the end.
While it is true that if Owens were to become an FA the Niners would have gained absolutely nothing from his leaving. However, Owens did not become an FA (circumstances are irrelevant, what happened, happened) so I expected to get more out of this.
I can see why they're doing what they're doing (the front office), building a team through the draft has worked for them in the past, but times have changed and the era of Free Agency has brought a whole new level of complexity to the way the game of football is played in the NFL.
There's a silver lining on every cloud, so this isn't all bad. I just think they could have done a whole lot better...
So whats the silver lining here?
Originally posted by: adams828
ahhh thank goodness... was happy when garcia left (he was great until this past season), but this is awesome! TO better hope he doesn't piss off ray lewis
Originally posted by: Staley8
Originally posted by: adams828
ahhh thank goodness... was happy when garcia left (he was great until this past season), but this is awesome! TO better hope he doesn't piss off ray lewis
You bring up a good point mentioning Ray Lewis. I find it hard to believe that Ray would allow Owens to act like he did the past two years with the niners. I think if you have a player like Lewis who has the respect but also some fear from his fellow players you are a lot better off having that player keep the others in line rather than trying to have a coach be the discplinary. The Ravens are Ray's team and I have to believe that he'll keep the players in line....even Owens.