Originally posted by: fanerman91
Nothing comes close to CRT.
Personally, I plan on getting an SXRD in the near-future. Great black levels. Great contrast. Great color. Of course it's not a CRT, but for the price, I'm not sure what else is better.
There is just so much wrong with that statement. Plasma tech has easily surpassed CRT in just about every area. What's with the allegiance to a dead technology? The ONLY thing CRT has going for it is black levels and I'd say it's has no noticeable advantage over my Panasonic 50pz700u. In fact, wrt Balck levels, I also have a 62u series Sharp Aquos that is BLOWN away by the Panasonic. And that is only really a 1 generation old LCD. Now, if we imagine that the new Pioneer is going to be even better than the Panasonic, where does that leave CRT?
Factor in the obvious advantages plasma (and LCD for that matter) brings. Resolution, Geometry, viewing angles, Size, etc. and I don't really see how you could possible be making a case for CRT at this time. Besides, the best CRTs are direct view and they only go to 40" and I'm not sure those are even 16:9 TV's. As far as projection CRT's, there is no contest as they do not compare to a good plasma. CRT technology is dead.