Unless you can write off you lease as a business expense which is probably what he is doing
Your source is from a site called lifehacker? The article is written by a no-nothing and is filled with bullshit wrapped in conjecture.Not all leases come with those terms. Maybe you got a lease and want to defend it, but sorry, it's conventional wisdom that buying is almost always better than leasing. I'm sorry you didn't know.
Could you explain, because she doesn't, why a second two year lease in involved? While you're at it, explain how it is that a used car is being leased. It's just not done. But I await your reply.In our example, the car loan monthly payment is $608 a month; the lease is $350 a month for the first 3-year lease and then $385 a month for the last two years (because a second lease is initiated).
Good to know. Is that factored into her calculations? You know, the one's she never actually makes, never documents?This example doesn't have any extra mileage fees, but if you drove 5,000 miles over the agreement, at 20 cents a mile, that would cost you $1,000.
Your source is from a site called lifehacker? The article is written by a no-nothing and is filled with bullshit wrapped in conjecture.
Could you explain, because she doesn't, why a second two year lease in involved? While you're at it, explain how it is that a used car is being leased. It's just not done. But I await your reply.
Good to know. Is that factored into her calculations? You know, the one's she never actually makes, never documents?
Click on the link where another site did the heavy lifting of making the calculations for her. Although the article you linked is from 2011, the link is still good. Why, the differences in leasing vs. buying is huge! It's not, just a little over $300. And in one scenario, it actually makes more sense to lease.
You get the dumbass award today. But hang tight because the day's not over yet, you could get unseated.
Your source is from a site called lifehacker? The article is written by a no-nothing and is filled with bullshit wrapped in conjecture.
Your source is from a site called lifehacker? The article is written by a no-nothing and is filled with bullshit wrapped in conjecture.
Could you explain, because she doesn't, why a second two year lease in involved? While you're at it, explain how it is that a used car is being leased. It's just not done. But I await your reply.
Good to know. Is that factored into her calculations? You know, the one's she never actually makes, never documents?
Click on the link where another site did the heavy lifting of making the calculations for her. Although the article you linked is from 2011, the link is still good. Why, the differences in leasing vs. buying is huge! It's not, just a little over $300. And in one scenario, it actually makes more sense to lease.
You get the dumbass award today. But hang tight because the day's not over yet, you could get unseated.