96Firebird
Diamond Member
Wow, I'm a left leaner, but some of you guys are fucking ridiculous.
good thinking. All of those jobs will be easily replaced by robots sooner than the jobs that require creative and critical thinking (not to shit on trades like that--I think they are awesome--but let's stop deluding ourselves about the nobility of near-obsolete tasks)
No one pities the stagecoach driver.
And yes, people can make education work right now. If they have parents that went to college, and can teach them how to navigate the system. But there are a lot of very smart individuals from families that have never gone to college, and they don't know how to navigate the system, so instead of becoming an engineer, they instead end up as fast food workers, or unemployed, or even worse, in prison, costing tax payers $50k per year possibly for life instead of $20k-$30k per year for four years. Oregon currently spends twice as much on prisons compared to higher education. That's fucked up.
I would say the tasks typically performed in corporate America are first up to be replaced by robots. Copy-n-paste into spreadsheets or firing off 1000's of emails are obsolete tasks. If you want to lift people up out of poverty, give them knowledge on how to "fish". The road to prosperity is not paved with PhD's or call center jobs.
Wow, I'm a left leaner, but some of you guys are fucking ridiculous.
My parents never went to college. My parents didn't know how to "navigate the system", whatever that means. I became an engineer, despite having two parents who collectively made under $60k a year.
I take solace in knowing I am a better person for it.
Same here, if my brother-in-law and sister move with my new nephew, my parents will probably follow since they are both on the verge of retiring. Family is the only thing keeping me here, so if they move I'll get out as well.
I hope nobody actually wonders why people are leaving the state.
My parents never went to college. My parents didn't know how to "navigate the system", whatever that means. I became an engineer, despite having two parents who collectively made under $60k a year.
I take solace in knowing I am a better person for it.
I've never needed to invade a foreign country, why should I pay for the military?I wonder why New Yorkers who opt not to attend college should be forced to pay for this.
I sincerely doubt it has much to do with free college tuition. It's mostly that upstate is totally bereft of decent economic opportunities.
Downstate New York has seen a dramatic population increase in recent years despite the fact that the overall tax burden here is higher than upstate. Pretty simple, the NYC area is a money machine and the rest of the state isn't.
You are an exception (which is great, I don't mean to take away anything from what you did, it is exceptional). The problem is, not everyone is exceptional, but there are individuals that aren't exceptional that can still make significant contributions to society with some support. Yes, there are also people that make it through under the current system. There are many more that get left behind. Which do you think is more valuable to society, you, or the person that didn't make it through because they weren't able to find the resources to navigate that path and instead is stuck at a minimum wage job supplementing their income through social programs for the remainder of their lives. Research shows we will pay for these individuals one way or the other (unless we become comfortable with letting these people and their children just starve in the street). We can either pay for them in a way that we train them to become more productive (and no, this won't be 100% efficient, there are some that still won't make it), or we can pay for their support for the rest of their lives.
I grew up a few miles away from farmland and open space.
It's now all luxury homes, golf courses, winneries, home depot\target\costco etc etc etc
For every person that runs off to Florida\Carolinas\Georgia\Nevada complaining about the cost of living, 20 people replace them.
So help us understand, what is ridiculous here?
This still doesn't equate to the degree being a waste. Even if a person doesn't make any more with a bachelors degree, they are still of greater benefit to the society because they are overall a more educated citizen. They are more informed voters, they are better communicators, and they are more socially aware of the wider world compared to those that don't attain degrees. The benefit of a college degree is not limited purely to a higher salary.This assumes that those people are able to do anything with a Bachelor's. The bottom quartile of college graduates makes the same amount as the average high school grad. One in four degrees issued is effectively a waste, and not a solution to fix the kind of person that lives in poverty generation after generation.
This is set up to crush small colleges and create a monopoly. 10 or 15% reduction in enrolment will do most in. There is a crappy financial aid assist with requires both matching funds from the college AND locking in tuition for the entire duration. Since there's no power to tax there's no equivalent mechanism besides tuition.
My son will be starting in an excellent science honors program and yeah we're kicking in and it's not easy, but worth it. If the institution stays open long enough he'll have a big advantage over the state colleges. If not I suppose there's out of state colleges.
This still doesn't equate to the degree being a waste. Even if a person doesn't make any more with a bachelors degree, they are still of greater benefit to the society because they are overall a more educated citizen. They are more informed voters, they are better communicators, and they are more socially aware of the wider world compared to those that don't attain degrees. The benefit of a college degree is not limited purely to a higher salary.
This obsession with STEM is insane. STEM degrees aren't the be all end all. Society would be a pretty boring place if we favored only STEM. Plus, there are many job functions that greatly benefit from non-STEM subjects. If anything, we should be striving for rigorous, well-rounded education that allow people to specialize in the subjects they want to specialize in.My state has (or at least had) a program that paid tuition for a 4 year degree., but you did have to maintain a minimum GPA (the requirement was pretty low). I think it should be limited to only STEM degrees.
I'm not sure if my state had income restrictions, but if a program like this is going to be offered I do not agree with any income restrictions.
Free state college tuition is not designed to crush small colleges and create a monopoly, it's designed to make college accessible and affordable. I mean most other developed nations have free or low cost public universities. Do you think those were created in an effort to destroy small schools or do you think they were created because they are a good idea?
Similarly I do not believe that free, universal K-12 education is designed to destroy small private K-12 schools.
That will likely be the effect and having been married to a prof who has been in small colleges because she and do a better job even though she earns far less than at a large uni. We're first hand witnesses to how things are, not how they are sold by the pols. No matter really. She'll probably last until retirement but my son will be entering a superb honors science program. Hopefully the college lasts but the chances are not great.
My state has (or at least had) a program that paid tuition for a 4 year degree., but you did have to maintain a minimum GPA (the requirement was pretty low). I think it should be limited to only STEM degrees.
I'm not sure if my state had income restrictions, but if a program like this is going to be offered I do not agree with any income restrictions.