*NEW UPDATED 2* Post Your Cinebench R11.5 Score

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

foureight84

Member
Nov 5, 2017
57
8
41
2x 2660 v3

27.60 points

GGYtCcg.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: crashtech

ClockHound

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2007
1,108
214
106
Hi! New system, new R11.5 score:

Funny how this thing is close to a 4P 12c Magny-Cours. And it totally schooled my old 1800x.

Wait. Your fancy new 12c/24 thread 3900x can't beat 48 antique cores? Seems like a good excuse to wait for the 3950x. ;-)
 

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,521
2,111
146
Great score, @DrMrLordX , but I had some time ago decided this benchmark was really not relevant anymore, and I've not been maintaining the thread. I could be wrong, though, and would hear arguments to the contrary.
 

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
21,582
10,785
136
@crashtech

CBR11.5 isn't terribly relevant so don't bother updating if you don't feel like it. I just had a little fun doing benchmark runs after I got a new high in CBR20.

Wait. Your fancy new 12c/24 thread 3900x can't beat 48 antique cores? Seems like a good excuse to wait for the 3950x. ;-)

Hey, Magny-Cours was pretty good for its time. 3950X isn't on the menu for me so it's this thing until Zen4 probably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crashtech

ClockHound

Golden Member
Nov 27, 2007
1,108
214
106
@crashtech

CBR11.5 isn't terribly relevant so don't bother updating if you don't feel like it. I just had a little fun doing benchmark runs after I got a new high in CBR20.



Hey, Magny-Cours was pretty good for its time. 3950X isn't on the menu for me so it's this thing until Zen4 probably.

Yes, yes it was. And my little Xeon 5675 was always jealous.

Don't ask how jealous it is of the 3900X. Since it will likely replace my X58 Forever dreamland this year
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
10,847
3,297
136
Great score, @DrMrLordX , but I had some time ago decided this benchmark was really not relevant anymore, and I've not been maintaining the thread. I could be wrong, though, and would hear arguments to the contrary.

It has a relevancy since it s indicative of SSE2 perfs, more recent versions of CB use wider instructions set, SSE4.2 for R15 and AVX for R20, not counting that there s a 32bit version for comparisons with old CPUs..
 

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,521
2,111
146
It has a relevancy since it s indicative of SSE2 perfs, more recent versions of CB use wider instructions set, SSE4.2 for R15 and AVX for R20, not counting that there s a 32bit version for comparisons with old CPUs..
Since there is continued interest, I have resumed maintaining the thread as seen above.

As always, anyone who feels their score has not been correctly recorded should feel free to PM me!
 
  • Like
Reactions: lopri and moinmoin

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,209
594
126
Since Ryzen 3000 series chips do not have a fixed clock speed for any given workload (only the base frequency is guaranteed.. sort of), how should I go about reporting the score from a 3700X?
 

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,521
2,111
146
Since Ryzen 3000 series chips do not have a fixed clock speed for any given workload (only the base frequency is guaranteed.. sort of), how should I go about reporting the score from a 3700X?
Good point! As far as I am concerned, I will accept submissions that appear reasonable. Generally just putting the CPU under stress in the CPU-Z "Bench" tab than tabbing over to the main screen to take your screenshot should be "good enough." The speed column is mainly intended for OCed CPUs, really.
 

lopri

Elite Member
Jul 27, 2002
13,209
594
126
I have two scores to post, run by 3700X.

Stock
Cinebench11_Stock.png

4.3 GHz
Cinebench11_4300.png

It is impossible to say at what frequency the stock configuration was run. I watched the cpu-z's Clocks tool, and most (not all) cores fluctuated between 4.10 GHz and 4.15 GHz during the run. All-core OC makes that determination easy for the second shot.
 

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,521
2,111
146
@lopri, your overclocked score looks to be a new 8-core record for conventionally cooled CPUs, I presume you have a large air or water cooler, and not a chiller or LN2, as we see in Totalnet's 5.6GHz 7820X score?

Edit: Generally, I take the highest score for any one system, saves space and makes my life easier.
 

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,521
2,111
146
Wowow. I had no idea! Yes, the CPU is cooled by Scythe Mugen and a 2000 RPM fan.
Exellent! As you can see, you beat the conventionally cooled 7820X by a healthy margin. AMD must be giving the Intel guys a hemorrhage right now, lol.

Although, we don't have any 9900K results in here, and we might expect it to be more competitive than the older 7820X in this benchmark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

IEC

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jun 10, 2004
14,323
4,904
136
3700X @ 4.4GHz all-core, 240mm AIO cooling. B450 ITX board (MSI)

10384