*NEW UPDATED 2* Post Your Cinebench R11.5 Score

[Totalnet]

Oh, crap... I wish ppl would call me out on this stuff. I will fix it.

Thanks man, you're the best...i just noticed it today when posting the new one, don't forget the [1] it was cooled by my chiller.

Regards, Dolf

 

[mrpiggy]

Swapped my 12-core Xeon e5-2690V3 with a 18-core e5-2699V3. Unlike the 2690V3 which maxed all cores at x35 turbo, when all the cores are loaded, it maxes mulitples to x32 but the 4 extra cores still bumps the score a lot. For lesser loads, 12 of the cores are normally maxed at x36 turbo multiplier at all times and the other 4 cores at x32. This is using the same BIOS CPU microcode hack and same everything else (i just swapped processors) as I was using previously to make the 2690 12-core stay maxed at x35 turbo at all times).

 

[Muadib]

Here is mine. The chip is nothing special.
https://imgur.com/OVM1Rg7

 

[eek2121]

Here is mine. The chip is nothing special.
https://imgur.com/OVM1Rg7

That voltage though.

 

[crashtech]

Here is mine. The chip is nothing special.
https://imgur.com/OVM1Rg7

What kind of cooling are you using?

 

[Muadib]

What kind of cooling are you using?

I'm using the h115i aio Temps are in the 60s, but I'm still playing with it.

 

[Justinus]

Old 5960x died, new 5960x is much better.

 

[BHZ-GTR]

Why My Score is Low ? My CPU : Intel Core i7 4790K

OS : Windows 10 X64 1709​

 

[Justinus]

Why My Score is Low ? My CPU : Intel Core i7 4790K

OS : Windows 10 X64 1709​

Image problems?

 

[indydude345]

I've finally done it. 4.02GHz on a Ryzen chip.

 

[DrMrLordX]

Word. Highest I ever got stable was 4.075 GHz.

 

[indydude345]

I'm using the bus multiplier but my memory, for some reason, only likes to stay within 3200-3400MHz range. I (hope) the CPU can go higher, so I'll try and run CB if it can.

 

[indydude345]

I could not get over 4.05, alas, twas a valiant effort.

 

[ao_ika_red]

I've finally done it. 4.02GHz on a Ryzen chip.

Neat! Another silicon lottery winner.

 

[crashtech]

Delidded:

 

[Markfw]

OK, it kept downclocking, so I have one while in progress, and one after:

 

[Markfw]

2700x@4.1

 

[crashtech]

@Markfw , your TR 1950x score seems a little off the pace, check the chart:

https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/new-updated-2-post-your-cinebench-r11-5-score.2443441/

 

[Markfw]

@Markfw , your TR 1950x score seems a little off the pace, check the chart:

https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/new-updated-2-post-your-cinebench-r11-5-score.2443441/

Probably subtimings. I messed with those, but kept getting system problems, so I just went with default.@3200 cas 14

same with the 2700x, cas 15 3466 default subtimings.

But the threadrippers are starting to take over the top of your chart.

 

[crashtech]

Yeah, I don't know if anyone will notice, but I broke all the 8+ core scores out of what used to be the 6+ category, and put them in the renamed 8+ category along with multiprocessor systems, since things have changed so much. I mean, we now have a single CPU system that is in 1st place, ahead of any multiprocessor score submitted to date!

 

[crashtech]

Old 2P DC system, not doing too badly:

 

[Anubis]

 

[crashtech]

Thanks @Anubis ! Your score seems a bit lower per GHz than some of the other entries, do you think there may have been stuff running in the background that might have slowed things down a bit?

 

[Anubis]

Thanks @Anubis ! Your score seems a bit lower per GHz than some of the other entries, do you think there may have been stuff running in the background that might have slowed things down a bit?

likely

this is wth just about everything closed. same settings so i didnt bother to open cpuz

 

[crashtech]

likely

this is wth just about everything closed. same settings so i didnt bother to open cpuz

snip

A full point increase, that's more like it!