• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New TV Plasma or Backlit LCD?

olds

Elite Member
Time to replace my 50" Panny plasma.
We watch TV in daylight with some ambient light on the screen but usually watch movies in a darkened room. I'd prefer the picture quality to be the best in the darkened room.

Highest priority: Picture quality
Budget: up to $3500
Size: 55"-60"
3D; yes

I am leaning towards plasma or full-array with local dimming. My present TV weighs 110# so the LCD would be nice to hang on the wall.

It will be connected to our wireless netwrok and also have a PC connected to it.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
You have a good budget, so I'd recommend either a 55" Sony HX950 or 65" Panasonic VT50. Each represents the best LCD and plasma in your price range. You can hang either one on the wall if you'd like.
 
You can get a P65VT50 for under $3k, if you want something that big.

Or you can get 55 inch P55VT50 for under $2k. Both of these are rated very highly in picture quality.

Also, if 3D is important to you, you should get a plasma.
 
You have a good budget, so I'd recommend either a 55" Sony HX950 or 65" Panasonic VT50. Each represents the best LCD and plasma in your price range. You can hang either one on the wall if you'd like.

even if the PQ was as good on the sony, you are getting a TON more area on a 65 vs 55....

right now, I would get a vt50 panny
 
even if the PQ was as good on the sony, you are getting a TON more area on a 65 vs 55....

right now, I would get a vt50 panny

I completely agree, however some people prefer LCD over plasma, that's why I listed the best out of both camps. Both the Sony and the Panasonic are great displays but they also have their share of issues, so it will be up to the customer to see which one they can live with.
 
The only thing you'll be getting better with an LED is less power consumption (which will likely add up to no more than $40/yr.), less chance of glare when viewing in the day time, and less weight.
 
With your budget, plasma. No one cares how thin a TV is unless you enjoy watching the side of it.
Good post. Yes, plasma is superior for viewing angles. LCD's and LED's will never catch up in this regard unless we are talking Star Trek technology.. that's.. year 2250+? :colbert:

Trust me... I have seen brand new LCD/LED TVs at the store and I looked at them from an angle and the picture started to shift brightness / contrast / and color....

Mine works so good. Got it back in 2004 for nearly $5000. It's 100% Japanese-made using Japanese parts down to the capacitors... No Chinese or Mexico parts that almost all TV's use today. This thing is a tank... not a single problem and beautiful PQ. I'm planning to keep mine until it dies. 😎
 
Last edited:
It was between a Kuro and Panny 50" when I bought my present TV. I really liked the Kuro but it wasn't $1k better.
The Kuro's are not as bright as other plasmas. It's only good for viewing movies in the dark.

Another problem with those Pioneer TV's is that they have flatter pictures, despite their superb low black levels. They look like you are looking at the pictures in the magazine or poster.... The Panasonic has the stronger depth and punchiness.
 
The Kuro's are not as bright as other plasmas. It's only good for viewing movies in the dark.

Completely false.

Another problem with those Pioneer TV's is that they have flatter pictures, despite their superb low black levels. They look like you are looking at the pictures in the magazine or poster.... The Panasonic has the stronger depth and punchiness.

Again, completely false. I get the impression you've never even seen a Kuro (8G, 9G) Pioneer in person.
 
i just got a panasonic st50 60" and it's pretty amazing. 3d is pretty damn cool in your home too. watched madagascar 3 and avengers in 3d, and the animated are definitely cooler in 3d. i was also pretty surprised how thin the tv is.
 
Completely false.
I used a little bit of exaggeration earlier. D:


Again, completely false. I get the impression you've never even seen a Kuro (8G, 9G) Pioneer in person.
Plenty of my friends (internet friends) have over at avforum because they own them. They have taken pictures of those displays for critiquing. Compare with mine they have more 2D look, not 3D.. My impression is that you've never even seen a 7th+ gen Panasonic plasmas with proper setup in person. 😉
 
JackBurton said:
I get the impression you've never even seen a Kuro (8G, 9G) Pioneer in person.
Plenty of my friends (internet friends) have over at avforum because they own them. They have taken pictures of those displays for critiquing.

So to summarize and eliminate the dancing - yes, he has never seen a Kuro in person.

Carry on.
 
So to summarize and eliminate the dancing - yes, he has never seen a Kuro in person.

Carry on.
I have not seen a Kuro in person but trust me guy, I know these TV's. They are not as punchy as the Panasonics, meaning the Pioneer Kuro's have flatter look. Not real flat by anybody's standard of course, but to my standard it's a bit flat. For average Joe, this isn't a problem at all. And of course that doesn't mean the Kuro has bad images... they still look lovely and has smooth pictures. Not exactly my type though.
 
Plenty of my friends (internet friends) have over at avforum because they own them. They have taken pictures of those displays for critiquing. Compare with mine they have more 2D look, not 3D.. My impression is that you've never even seen a 7th+ gen Panasonic plasmas with proper setup in person. 😉

That's what I figured, you've never seen one in person (internet friends, lol). Even funnier is, if you visit the dedicated Pioneer 9G thread at avsforum, most people will describe the picture on the Kuro as almost 3D. So the fact you are saying avs members are describing the picture as "flat" is a complete contradiction. And compared to a 2004 Panasonic? You have to be joking. A 7G Pioneer (non-Kuro) will slap around a 2004 Panasonic. It's not even close.

And you are judging picture quality on a display from images on the internet? Here's a little clue for you, it's not the images that are bad, it's your display that's the problem.

As for my experience with a 7G Panasonic plasma, I have seen one in person. I've also seen an ISF calibrated 9G Pioneer Elite in person, and there is absolutely no comparison. If you think they are even close, you are completely delusional.

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but your standards are VERY low if you are using a 2004 Panasonic to gauge picture quality of any TV produced past 2006. It wasn't even a high end TV in 2004 (Fujitsu was the big boy on the block back then when it came to plasmas). Panasonic was just mid tier back then. So it's not a matter of "properly setting it up," your TV is technically limited and no amount of calibration will change that. My advice to you is, it's way past time to upgrade. Your TV was surpassed back in 2004.


To everyone else, sorry for the derail.
 
Last edited:
I have not seen a Kuro in person but trust me guy, I know these TV's. They are not as punchy as the Panasonics, meaning the Pioneer Kuro's have flatter look. Not real flat by anybody's standard of course, but to my standard it's a bit flat. For average Joe, this isn't a problem at all. And of course that doesn't mean the Kuro has bad images... they still look lovely and has smooth pictures. Not exactly my type though.

No you don't. You are absolutely clueless. The worst part about it is, you don't even know you're clueless.
 
(internet friends, lol).
😀

Even funnier is, if you visit the dedicated Pioneer 9G thread at avsforum, most people will describe the picture on the Kuro as almost 3D.
You say "almost 3D" for the Kuro. The Panasonic "is" 3D.


So the fact you are saying avs members are describing the picture as "flat" is a complete contradiction.
I didn't say "them". I said "I said" after critiquing the pictures they have taken and posted them up on the forum. Compare to mine the Pioneer (Kuro and the older line up) do have flatter looking pictures. They lack contrast. Trust me. Does the picture quality end there? Of course not. There's more to it.


And compared to a 2004 Panasonic? You have to be joking. A 7G Pioneer (non-Kuro) will slap around a 2004 Panasonic. It's not even close.
I'm not joking. The Pioneer non-Kuro ones that released a few years after my Panasonic model all got their butt spanked somewhat hard by my TV in the picture contest festival.. I beat all of them. The 7 and 8G Pioneer guys admitted they got defeated by my TV and handed me the hats. I remember those times... was so much fun. Kuro isn't a fair comparison to my TV as there is a big gap in black level performance and so much newer... but like I said earlier, black level is only tiny part of the equation.

And you are judging picture quality on a display from images on the internet? Here's a little clue for you, it's not the images that are bad, it's your display that's the problem.
The images are taken by the professionals, which is me 🙂D) and the other folks. I am the camera freak. And the buddies I used to compete with have good cameras and are trained. My display isn't the problem. It's just that I am a little weird, but in "artistic" way. 😉 Meaning a videophile.

As for my experience with a 7G Panasonic plasma, I have seen one in person.
Probably one off the shelf fed by Air or cable TV stations via RCA / Composite or Coaxial.... and I take it, it was a consumer version?

I've also seen an ISF calibrated 9G Pioneer Elite in person, and there is absolutely no comparison. If you think they are even close, you are completely delusional.
Read above. You are comparing against an uncalibrated, consumer ver. Panasonic with crappy source. Which is why it's unfair comparison. Those 7- 9G Pioneers do scale better in SD than the Panasonics due to the electronics the Pioneer added. It's not delusional. it's called biased comparison. 😀

I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but your standards are VERY low if you are using a 2004 Panasonic to gauge picture quality of any TV produced past 2006. It wasn't even a high end TV in 2004 (Fujitsu was the big boy on the block back then when it came to plasmas). Panasonic was just mid tier back then.
Fujitsu has considerably better electronics for post image processing and scaling. It is made to excel in viewing crappy SD contents on a large screen. It also features better motion handling too. The glass and the rest of the screen is no better than the Panasonic 7G. Panasonic's used to spank the 7G Pioneer in blacks and still beat 8G Pioneer in contrast... Those 8G Pioneer pictures look so *processed*.

So it's not a matter of "properly setting it up," your TV is technically limited and no amount of calibration will change that. My advice to you is, it's way past time to upgrade.
That's incorrect. Setting up the TV part is very important. Going from VGA to DVI was a night and day difference. Whites have improved (cleaner whiter whites than going through analog (VGA). Their black drive system on the TV is stellar. These TV's also have pixels lit brighter which made pictures have better contrast and punchness. This is where Pioneer TV's lack. Their pixels don't lit as bright so the images look "flatter", like looking at the pictures printed on magazine or poster. You can feel 2D whereas the Panasonics really look 3D, i.e. looking-out-the-window effect.


Your TV was surpassed back in 2004.
Like I said, my 2004 tech used to spank all Pioneer TVs (including Pro series) before Kuro lines. AND, mine still beats the Kuro in the contrast... They still look a little flat... still descent looking picture though.
 
Last edited:
😀

You say "almost 3D" for the Kuro. The Panasonic "is" 3D.

🙄 It is as 3D as a 2D display can be, hence the word "almost."


As for the rest of your ramblings, I will simply say you are EXTREMELY uninformed (which was already established EARLY on in your "cables" thread). I don't even think you understand what the heck "contrast" even means, let alone how it pertains to PQ. So instead of derailing this thread any further with your bogus claims, let's get back on topic.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top