(new title) are these statements justifiable? are they slanderous?

[Infohawk]

Originally posted by: chess9
Infohawk:

You never should have responded to the substance, what little there is, of this post. Until you posted, this gentleman was hanging out in the wind to dry.

-Robert

Doh! That would have been funny.

In any case I was planning on abandoning this thread quickly since it's about me and not P&N. I'm not really interested in discussing myself here. If someone wants to discuss what I said in my posts post in the other threads.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Look. this whole Bush = Hitler crap is nothing but rhetorical smearing and if the left even gave it a moment's thought they'd realize it.

It's very simple. If Bush were anywhere equal to Hitler, no liberals would be posting that sentiment on a friggin' website. If Bush were Hitler, liberal havens like ATP&N wouldn't be permitted to exist. The Boston Globe, NY Times, LA Times, and that San Fran rag would've been shut down long ago. You'd have no Juan Cole, Democratic Underground, and Michael Moore would be hanging by his toenails in some undisclosed, dank basement. There'd be no CNN or CBS News. We wouldn't even be discussing elections because there wouldn't be one, and if there were an election there's be no other candidate besides Bush.

So please, give up this transparent claim that doesn't jibe with any sort of reality and is really nothing more than baiting the opposing camp.

 

[rbV5]

It's very simple. If Bush were anywhere equal to Hitler, no liberals would be posting that sentiment on a friggin' website.

Like the right wouldn't hesitate to explain away how moral and right it would be to keep them from saying it or maybe make them pay at the very least, given the chance. Which of course is perfectly debatable as a topic and not all what the intent of this thread is.

 

[TastesLikeChicken]

Originally posted by: rbV5

It's very simple. If Bush were anywhere equal to Hitler, no liberals would be posting that sentiment on a friggin' website.

Like the right wouldn't hesitate to explain away how moral and right it would be to keep them from saying it or maybe make them pay at the very least, given the chance.

The "right" wouldn't exist.

Which of course is perfectly debatable as a topic and not all what the intent of this thread is.

The thread title now asks whether or not these statements are justifiable, so I believe my response directly addresses that issue. The answer is no, they are not justifiable and are ultimately nothing more than trolling.

 

[JetsFanatic]

bye bye buddy