New SEIU song in Wisconsin... civility? Nah...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,530
3
0
nope. why? I'm probably missing some joke here but I've only been around sporadically. Too busy with doing real work around the nation.

Oh nothing, like her you are a tenacious debater. Don't like either of your styles but you both wear me down.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,038
36
86
I think you might be confused. My guess is he is posting 'save234' so he can quickly find the post again if he needs to? Probably when he needs to own Craig again. :awe:

Oh no, I'm not confused, I've seen him end his posts many times with it. Every time, after I get done either laughing at his posts or shaking my head in disbelief, it always brings a smile to my face. The others who have commented on this up till now I'm in agreement with...
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Don't laugh you may be their side someday as wealth concentration keeps increasing which is inevitable with current policy.
 
Last edited:

UberNeuman

Lifer
Nov 4, 1999
16,937
3,087
126
Don't laugh you may be their side someday as wealth concentration keeps increasing which is inevitable with current policy.

Zebo, I think I love ya - in a platonic way...

As for the Cragiers - he tends to support and discuss what he says, unlike most of those who attack just to attack...

/bring your A-game, or go home....
//oh no, it's so much easier for the blow hard "righties" to whine....
///see the OP....
 
Last edited:

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,995
776
126
Thanks for pointing to this Cad, song's pretty catchy. And LOL at you being retarded and taking everything literally.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,995
776
126
That's because literacy isn't your strong point.

Smash

That's because only a retard would take every word in the lyrics literally. I'm sure they literally meant the bosses are bastards too (as in illegitimate child) or that you could literally exchange your soul for currency. When you say you're going to kick someone's ass, do you literally mean you're going to send your foot to someone's buttocks? I know conservatives are dumb as shit, but even this takes the cake.
 
Last edited:

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
From the other other other thread but junior thinks he has a point or something ;)

The way you use it? Obviously it is, it's one your favorite phrases to use on other ATPN members (not exactly the bastion of female paradise):

To Vic:



You kind of have a reputation there. Context is everything.

Uh, and? That doesn't make the term homophobic. Do you understand the concept of a fluffer? Litterally it's someone who prepares another for performance. I could care less about gender or orientation - which you seem to be enamored with. Meh, i guess if you think of unions as be male then maybe it's you with the issues and instead of projecting, you should work on your chauvinistic tendencies :)
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,995
776
126
From the other other other thread but junior thinks he has a point or something ;)



Uh, and? That doesn't make the term homophobic. Do you understand the concept of a fluffer? Litterally it's someone who prepares another for performance. I could care less about gender or orientation - which you seem to be enamored with. Meh, i guess if you think of unions as be male then maybe it's you with the issues and instead of projecting, you should work on your chauvinistic tendencies :)

You aren't very smart or you're a liar. Not, not even close to 'literally'.

It's someone who keeps a MALE performer aroused for performance. And in the way you use it, YOU'RE saying that the union is 'male'. And the way you've always used it, it was in the context of homosexuality. Words have meanings.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fluffer

Top 3 accepted definitions:

(noun) a person in the adult entertainment industry whose job it is to give male porno stars blowjobs in order to get them ready to perform.

Pornographic film industry employee who is responsible for keeping male performers aroused (usually via oral sex) between takes during a shoot.

Noun: In the pornographic film industry, the member of the production crew who keeps male performers sexually aroused between takes so that there are no delays on set.

You're obviously using the term in a deragatory way and You're obviously obsessed with guys giving other guys bj's. You are complete fail.
 
Last edited:

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
You aren't very smart or you're a liar. Not, not even close to 'literally'.

It's someone who keeps a MALE performer aroused. And in the way you use it, YOU'RE saying that the union is 'male'. And the way you've always used it, it was in the context of homosexuality. Words have meanings.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fluffer

Top 3 accepted definitions:

Wrong. There are female performers who use fluffers:)

Also wrong - I did not suggest the Union was male - that seems to be something YOU ASSumed as you typically do and then try to twist into a "gotcha". You might be well served to enter a sensitivity training, it could help with your male bias.

So to summarize - there is no way you can suggest that using the word fluffer is homophobic. Your ignorance is no excuse and doesn't mean you get to twist it into a homophobic issue.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,995
776
126
Wrong. There are female performers who use fluffers:)

Also wrong - I did not suggest the Union was male - that seems to be something YOU ASSumed as you typically do and then try to twist into a "gotcha". You might be well served to enter a sensitivity training, it could help with your male bias.

So to summarize - there is no way you can suggest that using the word fluffer is homophobic. Your ignorance is no excuse and doesn't mean you get to twist it into a homophobic issue.

1) LMAO, NOBODY uses the word that way (as in nearly 100%, i know you're going to google some idiot who uses it wrong or the 1 exception where there actually is a female 'flufee', even though thousands agree on urbandictionary that YOU'RE WRONG). Why the fuck would a female performer need a 'fluffer'. The only thing they need is lubricant. God you are such a liar. Some people in the adult industry even say that a 'fluffer' is a myth. Maybe an anachronistic thing that doesn't exist anymore.

Why don't you look at how the overwhelming majority agree with what the definition is:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fluffer


2) It's the way you use it that gives it it's homophobic vibe. Stop lying.

The amount of shit you make up is astounding.

Edit:

Crying about 'gotcha's' make you sound like Sarah Palin. About the same intellect so it wouldn't surprise me if there was some relation.
 
Last edited:

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
1) LMAO, NOBODY uses the word that way (as in nearly 100%, i know you're going to google some idiot who uses it wrong or the 1 exception where there actually is a female 'flufee', even though thousands agree on urbandictionary that YOU'RE WRONG). Why the fuck would a female performer need a 'fluffer'. The only thing they need is lubricant. God you are such a liar. Some people in the adult industry even say that a 'fluffer' is a myth. Maybe an anachronistic thing that doesn't exist anymore.

Why don't you look at how the overwhelming majority agree with what the definition is:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fluffer


2) It's the way you use it that gives it it's homophobic vibe. Stop lying.

The amount of shit you make up is astounding.

Edit:

Crying about 'gotcha's' make you sound like Sarah Palin. About the same intellect so it wouldn't surprise me if there was some relation.

lol, nowhere did I claim that it wasn't traditionally used for male performers but that doesn't mean it is only male performers.
Again, you can consider the union male and presume that the union fluffers are all male so you can have your little homophobic gotcha but it just doesn't fly. NO ONE hears "fluffer" and thinks "homosexual", "homophobic", or whatever - only people like you who try to label others as "homophobic".

BTW, I assume you'll stop using the "tea bagger" label for people.... cuz you know... :p No, I won't hold you to that, I know better than to think you or your kind can be honest/consistent. :)
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,995
776
126
lol, nowhere did I claim that it wasn't traditionally used for male performers but that doesn't mean it is only male performers.

That's how 99.9999% of the people use the word. Words have MEANING.

Again, you can consider the union male and presume that the union fluffers are all male so you can have your little homophobic gotcha but it just doesn't fly. NO ONE hears "fluffer" and thinks "homosexual", "homophobic", or whatever - only people like you who try to label others as "homophobic".

You call people 'union fluffers', so in this case,the union would be 'male'. You reference ATPN posters (are there even any females that post here?) as 'fluffers'.


BTW, I assume you'll stop using the "tea bagger" label for people.... cuz you know... :p No, I won't hold you to that, I know better than to think you or your kind can be honest/consistent. :)

"Tea Bagees" don't have to be male.

Top definition is gender neutral (edit: and in their example, they use a girl's name) for the tea bagee... the next two reference women. Man you fail so hard.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tea+bagger
 
Last edited: