OK, so for your little game to be anywhere close(assuming we ignore the problems with the rest of your charade) the "fluffers" would have to be male. So for you to consider "fluffer" a "homophobic" term no women would have to be involved - AND you'd have to suggest it was deragatory towards homosexuals. Neither is the case, so again, even if you were granted a portion(which you aren't) you still fail at your little game. Carry on though - it's what your types do.
Well, you keep using 'fluffer' in the context of male to male. You first tried to lie that the recipient was generally meant to be gender neutral when the overwhelming majority of the people who know what the word means would assume it to be a man on the receiving end. Again, words have meanings and also context depending on how you use it. You DEFINITELY have a thing on guy on guy action.
You calling Red Dawn a 'fluffer':
You obviously have zero clue about farming. Yes, corporate farming has taken a big chunk and due to taxing and regulations most farms have become corporations - but there are still huge numbers of small family farmers out there. It's also ignorant to suggest that they just go to the mailbox to collect other people's money... but lets just roll with that for a minute. Why do you notice the entitlement(subsidy) in the farmer but totally ignore the entitlement mentality on display by the public unions?
Meh... i know you're a fluffer but as an optimist - I still hold out hope you'll change someday.
You calling Vic a 'fluffer':
Originally Posted by CADsortaGUY
Whoa their chief. No where did I say it didn't matter and your suggestion is nothing more than pure unadulterated BS. Please take your head out of your ass for once and try to be honest like you used to be before you became a BHO fluffer.
You saying infohawk and darkhawk 'fluff' each other
You can ASSume whatever you wish. Do you have anything about the contents of the piece you'd like to address or are you and Darkhawk28 going to fluff each other a bit longer.
CsG
LMAO, infohawk even calls you out on your hypocrisy, apparently you cried about being called one too:
Didn't you once complain about a fluffing comment? I guess what's good for the goose isn't good for the gander?
The contents of the piece don't deserve any attention as the source is inherently biased.
Stop lying Cad, we know how you're using the word. You have a bright future in rightwing radio with all the spin you're using.
DAMN THOSE MEANINGS
In case you still wanted to fight the first part of your little game. Do you need help or can you figure it out.
Damn you are too easy... Gotta go now, play time is over.
Yeah run away, "Many adult film stars today maintain that fluffers are a thing of the past, needed in the '70s and '80s when the crew, shooting on celluloid, needed much more time to prepare a shot. Erectile dysfunction drugs such as Viagra have also taken part in replacing fluffers."
Like i said, Anachronistic. Poll how people use it and the overwhelming majority use it to assume 'men' TODAY, that's why every popular definition of the word assumes a male recipient.
Gotta go = 'wah, i'm so wrong, let me run'