Originally posted by: thecoroner
New Orleans is the second largest port in the world (the title of largest belongs to Rotterdam). It is also important historically. Before Katrina, it was the 28th most populous city in the United States.
And besides, we PAY TAXES TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. How is someone we pay money to for protection not responsible for helping us after a hurricane?
And like loup garou said, the federal government didn't do its job with the levees. They should have withstoud the hurricane (it was under category 3 strength in New Orleans). The Army Core of Engineers did a piss poor job. Why are we constructing our levees with dirt and steel when the Netherlands have much more advanced levees than us? Are we not the richest nation in the world?
ISN'T THAT WHAT INSURANCE IS FOR?????
I have to pay for insurance on my house to have it rebuilt if it gets destroyed , why shouldn't they? We should not have to pay to rebuild something because the owner chose to put his money in his pocket instead of buying insurance. No matter who is responsible for the accident , why is it ours to pay for.
If an uninsured peson hits my house with a vehicle and destroys it , my insurance pays to fix/rebuild it and I take the hit for the claim in future rate costs. I guess that only applies to the moral working class huh?
The reason we don't have the money for better levees is that the money goes to all the people who depend on the government for a living rather than earning one. That is one of the reasons NO was one of the most populous cities in the Nation.
I have saai it before and I'll say it again. If you had been giving away Big Screen TV's in Baton Rouge , the residents who were in NO and couldn't get out during Katrina would have found a way to not only get to BR to get , but would have found a way to return with that Big Screen TV.
Just a little addition to this. Perhaps it's time to consider the insurance companies themselves. They take in huge amounts of money , invest it , then put the profits in there pockets. It's kind of like the SS program. It should be there , but it's not. The problem is the self worth of the executives. Do you believe the CEO of an insurance company should be making $20,000,000 a year plus perks?
Should the CEO of any company?
Should a pro sports person?
How about a lawyer?
ENRON people!
Everyone from the document shredding accountants to the top of Enron should be tried under the RICO statutes and forfeit everyting they have to the people they screwed. The same goes for the pirates in the insurance industry. The Corporate leaders get theirs and you are left high and dry. If you justify the "make what you can" statement I have seen many times , you have no right to bitch.
Rant on pause!